Literature DB >> 21359047

Scoring of the physical therapist clinical performance instrument (PT-CPI): analysis of 7 years of use.

Peggy L Proctor1, Vanina P Dal Bello-Haas, Arlis M McQuarrie, M Suzanne Sheppard, Rhonda J Scudds.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to (1) describe the completion rates of the 24 performance criteria (PCs) from the Physical Therapist Clinical Performance Instrument (PT-CPI) by clinical instructors; (2) evaluate change in PC visual analogue scores (VAS) with students' clinical experience; and (3) evaluate scoring patterns over time.
METHODS: Final VAS scores for 208 physiotherapy (PT) students (seven cohorts) from 1,039 clinical placements between 2001 and 2008 were analyzed. Completion rates were calculated for each PC. Kruskal-Wallis tests evaluated differences in VAS scores between cohorts. Friedman's tests were used to compare VAS scores for each PC over time.
RESULTS: Completion rates were above 90% for 18 PCs. Data from the seven cohorts were combined. All PC scores showed significant change from 10 to 15 weeks and from 15 to 20 weeks of clinical experience (p≤0.001). Although differences in scores decreased over time, 19 PCs showed significant differences between 20 and 25 weeks, and 11 PCs showed significant differences between 25 and 31 weeks of clinical experience (p<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Certain PCs had lower completion rates. The PT-CPI was used consistently by clinical instructors to evaluate student performance over time. A continual progression in acquisition of clinical competencies was illustrated by PT-CPI scoring patterns as students advanced through their PT education programme.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical education; clinical performance; physical therapy education; students

Year:  2010        PMID: 21359047      PMCID: PMC2871024          DOI: 10.3138/physio.62.2.147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiother Can        ISSN: 0300-0508            Impact factor:   1.037


  3 in total

1.  The development and testing of APTA Clinical Performance Instruments. American Physical Therapy Association.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2002-04

2.  Evaluating clinical competence of physical therapy students. Part 2: assessing the reliability, validity and usability of a new instrument.

Authors:  J Loomis
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  1985 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.037

3.  Evaluating clinical competence of physical therapy students. Part 1: the development of an instrument.

Authors:  J Loomis
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  1985 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.037

  3 in total
  8 in total

1.  Clinician's Commentary on Mori et al.(1).

Authors:  Mark Hall
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Observations and Performances "with distinction" by Physical Therapy Students in Clinical Education: Analysis of Checkboxes on the Physical Therapist Clinical Performance Instrument (PT-CPI) over a 4-Year Period.

Authors:  Kathleen E Norman; Randy Booth
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.037

3.  Clinician's Commentary on Dawes et al.(1.).

Authors:  Kathleen E Norman
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.037

4.  Assessing Physical Therapy Students' Performance during Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Sue Murphy; Megan Dalton; Diana Dawes
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.037

5.  Clinical Performance Scores of Internationally Educated Physical Therapists during Clinical Education in a Bridging Programme.

Authors:  Michael E Kalu; Sharon Switzer-McIntyre; Martine Quesnel; Catherine Donnelly; Kathleen E Norman
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 1.037

6.  Evidence of Reliability, Validity, and Practicality for the Canadian Physiotherapy Assessment of Clinical Performance.

Authors:  Brenda Mori; Kathleen E Norman; Dina Brooks; Jodi Herold; Dorcas E Beaton
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.037

7.  Clinical Instructors' Perceptions of Internationally Educated Physical Therapists' Readiness to Practise during Supervised Clinical Internships in a Bridging Programme.

Authors:  Michael E Kalu; Sharon Switzer-Mclntrye; Martine Quesnel; Catherine Donnelly; Kathleen E Norman
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 1.037

8.  Are physical therapy interns competent in patient management skills? Assessment of the views of clinical and academic physical therapists.

Authors:  Saad M Bindawas; Vishal Vennu; Samy A Azer
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2013-06-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.