Literature DB >> 21358830

After a Cesarean…What's a Birth Professional to Do?

Desirre Andrews1, Gretchen Humphries.   

Abstract

The discrepancy between the evidence supporting vaginal birth after cesarean and actual medical practice illuminates the larger issues of evidence-based care versus current obstetrical practice. Although the reasons for the disconnect between what we know to be healthy birth practices and what women actually experience are multiple and complex, a commitment to providing accurate education, truly client-centered support, and active patient advocacy will give women the ability to insist on best practice care for themselves and their babies. The International Cesarean Awareness Network believes that all childbirth professionals and advocates share a responsibility to promote change and must work together to be effective.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21358830      PMCID: PMC2866434          DOI: 10.1624/105812410X495505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinat Educ        ISSN: 1058-1243


  4 in total

1.  Reconsideration of the costs of convenience: quality, operational, and fiscal strategies to minimize elective labor induction.

Authors:  Kathleen Rice Simpson
Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.638

2.  Cesarean section: analysis of the experience before and after the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth.

Authors:  S R Soliman; R F Burrows
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-04-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Hippocratic ideal, Faustian bargain and Damocles' sword: erosion of patient autonomy in obstetrics.

Authors:  E A Rybak
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.521

4.  Elective repeat cesarean sections: how many could be vaginal births?

Authors:  P Norman; S Kostovcik; A Lanning
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Japanese women.

Authors:  Akira Yokoi; Kaoru Ishikawa; Ken Miyazaki; Kana Yoshida; Madoka Furuhashi; Koji Tamakoshi
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.738

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.