Literature DB >> 21358477

Sagittal alignment after Bryan cervical arthroplasty.

Rick C Sasso1, Newton H Metcalf, John A Hipp, Nicholas D Wharton, Paul A Anderson.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial from one study site.
OBJECTIVE: Examine the radiographic sagittal alignment of the Bryan cervical disc for one-level disease. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Prospective, randomized studies demonstrate Bryan arthroplasty provides statistically better functional outcomes than anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Uncontrolled case reports describe kyphosis after disc replacement. No prospective study has critically assessed sagittal alignment after cervical arthroplasty.
METHODS: Forty-eight patients reviewed with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Quantitative motion analysis determined the change in overall (C2-C7) and treatment-level sagittal alignment, disc space heights, and range of motion.
RESULTS: Preoperatively, overall sagittal alignment was equivalent in the two groups. At 24-month follow-up, overall lordosis for the cohorts was not statistically different from preoperative values for each group. In addition, overall lordosis was not significantly different at 24 months when comparing Bryan patients with the fusion patients. The average change in disc angle from preoperative to immediate postoperative at the treated level in the Bryan disc group was a nonsignificant increase in lordosis of 0.92°. The anterior disc height was the same at all time points, but the posterior disc height was slightly (0.7 mm) more in the Bryan than in the fusion patients (P = 0.04). The angular range of motion in the Bryan group was statistically equivalent at all time points. At the fused levels, average range of motion decreased from 6.4° to 0.9° at 24 months (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: With the Bryan disc, there was an insignificant increase in lordosis of 0.9° at immediate postoperative time point. Overall cervical sagittal alignment is not different between the experimental and control populations. This prospective study does not demonstrate a clinically significant increase in segmental kyphosis after Bryan disc arthroplasty. Global cervical lordosis is statistically equivalent between arthroplasty and fusion groups at 2 years follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21358477     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182076d70

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  15 in total

Review 1.  Cervical spine alignment in disc arthroplasty: should we change our perspective?

Authors:  Alberto Di Martino; Rocco Papalia; Erika Albo; Leonardo Cortesi; Luca Denaro; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  WITHDRAWN: Arthroplasty versus fusion in single-level cervical degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  Toon F M Boselie; Paul C Willems; Henk van Mameren; Rob de Bie; Edward C Benzel; Henk van Santbrink
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-05-21

Review 3.  Factors that may affect outcome in cervical artificial disc replacement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jian Kang; Changgui Shi; Yifei Gu; Chengwei Yang; Rui Gao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Heterotopic ossification is related to change in disc space angle after Prestige-LP cervical disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Lingyun Hu; Jianying Zhang; Hao Liu; Yang Meng; Yi Yang; Guangzhou Li; Chen Ding; Beiyu Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Outcomes of the Bryan cervical disc replacement: fifteen year follow-up.

Authors:  Vincent Pointillart; Jean-Etienne Castelain; Pierre Coudert; Derek Thomas Cawley; Olivier Gille; Jean-Marc Vital
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty: ten year follow-up study.

Authors:  Qingpeng Song; Da He; Xiao Han; Ning Zhang; Jinchao Wang; Wei Tian
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  The association of cervical sagittal alignment with adjacent segment degeneration.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Yang; Ronald H M A Bartels; Roland Donk; Mark P Arts; Caroline M W Goedmakers; Carmen L A Vleggeert-Lankamp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  10-year follow-up after implantation of the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis.

Authors:  Joost Dejaegher; Joris Walraevens; Johannes van Loon; Frank Van Calenbergh; Philippe Demaerel; Jan Goffin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  A meta-analysis comparing the results of cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease.

Authors:  Yu Gao; Ming Liu; Tao Li; Fuguo Huang; Tingting Tang; Zhou Xiang
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Versus Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2019-02-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.