Literature DB >> 21358476

Change in sagittal balance with placement of an interspinous spacer.

Leah M Schulte1, Joseph R O'Brien, Lauren E Matteini, Warren D Yu.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective case series.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of X-STOP implantation on sagittal spinal balance using 36-inch films. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Interspinous process spacers have been shown as an effective treatment of neurogenic claudication. The devices block the last few degrees of extension at the stenotic level, thus preventing compression of the nerve roots. These devices have been criticized because they may push the patient's spine into a kyphotic position. However, opening the stenotic level may allow a patient to stand more upright, thereby improving sagittal balance.
METHODS: Institutional review board's approval was obtained. A prospective study of 20 patients who were undergoing an X-STOP insertion was utilized. Their spines were x-rayed preoperatively and postoperatively with 36-inch films. Preoperative and postoperative sagittal balance was measured with a C7 body plum line on both films and the difference was measured. Lumbar lordosis was also compared using Cobb angles.
RESULTS: Measurements taken from lateral full-length spine radio-graphs showed an average improvement in sagittal balance of 2.0 cm (range -3.7 to 6.1 cm). The average change in lordosis was -1.1°.
CONCLUSION: Although previous studies of interspinous process distraction have examined segmental lordosis, disc angles, and other parameters, this study is the first to examine overall spinal balance on full-length films. Interspinous distraction does not seem to be detrimental to sagittal balance, and may improve it.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21358476     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182077005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  5 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive spine surgery: systematic review.

Authors:  Péter Banczerowski; Gábor Czigléczki; Zoltán Papp; Róbert Veres; Harry Zvi Rappaport; János Vajda
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Analysis of Long-Term Results of Lumbar Discectomy With and Without an Interspinous Device.

Authors:  Miguel Ángel Plasencia Arriba; Carmen Maestre; Fernando Martín-Gorroño; Paula Plasencia
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-07-31

3.  Bone resorption during the first year after implantation of a single-segment dynamic interspinous stabilization device and its risk factors.

Authors:  Kaifeng Wang; Zhenqi Zhu; Bo Wang; Yi Zhu; Haiying Liu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 4.  Could the Topping-Off Technique Be the Preventive Strategy against Adjacent Segment Disease after Pedicle Screw-Based Fusion in Lumbar Degenerative Diseases? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Po-Hsin Chou; Hsi-Hsien Lin; Howard S An; Kang-Ying Liu; Wei-Ren Su; Cheng-Li Lin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Decompression Surgery versus Interspinous Devices for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Jennifer Tram; Shanmukha Srinivas; Arvin R Wali; Courtney S Lewis; Martin H Pham
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2020-01-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.