Literature DB >> 21358465

Cement augmentation of refractory osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: survivorship analysis.

Michael C Gerling1, Jason D Eubanks, Rakesh Patel, Peter G Whang, Henry H Bohlman, Nicholas U Ahn.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort.
OBJECTIVE: To compare survivorship after cement augmentation of refractory osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) with traditional inpatient pain management and bracing. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: OVCFs can cause debilitating pain and functional decline necessitating prolonged bed rest and high-dose narcotics. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are cement augmentation procedures used to control pain and restore function in patients with OVCF's that are refractory to conservative treatment. Early mobilization is associated with improved survival after other fractures in elderly patients.
METHODS: A university hospital database was used to identify all participants treated with primary diagnosis of OVCF between 1993 and 2006. Chart review and imaging studies were used to confirm demographics, comorbidities, diagnosis, and treatment. Survival time was determined using hospital data, national death indices and patient follow-up. Exact Fisher tests, Mann-Whitney tests, and proportional hazards regression models with Kaplan-Meier plots compared patients treated with cement augmentation with controls treated with inpatient pain management and bracing. Patients with high-energy trauma, tumors or age more than 60 years were excluded.
RESULTS: Within the past 12 years, 46 patients treated with cement augmentation and 129 matched controls met inclusion criteria. They did not differ with respect to age, sex, and comorbidities. A significant survival advantage was found after cement augmentation compared with controls (P < 0.001; log rank), regardless of comorbidities, age, or the number of fractures diagnosed at the start date (P = 0.565). Controlling simultaneously for covariates, the estimated hazard ratio associated with cementation was 0.10 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.02-0.43; P = 0.002) for year 1, 0.15 (95% CI = 0.02-1.12; P = 0.064) for year 2, and 0.95 (95% CI = 0.32-2.79; P = 0.919) for subsequent follow-up. The number of OVCFs at the start time of treatment did not affect survival benefit of cementation (P = 0.44).
CONCLUSION: Cement augmentation of refractory OVCF improves survival for up to 2 years when compared with conservative pain management with bed rest, narcotics, and extension bracing, regardless of age, sex, and number of fractures or comorbidities. Therefore, aggressive management should be considered for refractory OVCFs with intractable back pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21358465     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820a0b3f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  16 in total

1.  Can Internet information on vertebroplasty be a reliable means of patient self-education?

Authors:  T Barrett Sullivan; Joshua T Anderson; Uri M Ahn; Nicholas U Ahn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Critique of the analysis of UpToDate.com on the treatment of painful vertebral compression fractures: time to update UpToDate.

Authors:  D P Beall; W P McRoberts; S H Berven; J T Ledlie; S M Tutton; B P Parsons
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Pedicle screw fixation with kyphoplasty decreases the fracture risk of the treated and adjacent non-treated vertebral bodies: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Pan Yang; Ying Zhang; Huan-Wen Ding; Jian Liu; Lin-Qiang Ye; Jin Xiao; Qiang Tu; Tao Yang; Fei Wang; Guo-Gang Sun
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2016-12-07

4.  [Osteoporotic vertebral body fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. Diagnostics and therapeutic strategies].

Authors:  C Josten; C Schmidt; U Spiegl
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Results of Vertebral Augmentation Treatment for Patients of Painful Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Meta-Analysis of Eight Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Lianhua Li; Jixin Ren; Jia Liu; Hao Wang; Xiaowei Wang; Zhi Liu; Tiansheng Sun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation combined with percutaneous vertebroplasty for preventing secondary fracture after vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Yu-Tong Gu; Dong-Hui Zhu; Hai-Fei Liu; Feng Zhang; Robert McGuire
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Vertebroplasty of cervical vertebra.

Authors:  Kazimierz Kordecki; Andrzej Lewszuk; Magdalena Puławska-Stalmach; Paweł Michalak; Adam Łukasiewicz; Izabela Sackiewicz; Piotr Polaków; Katarzyna Rutka; Wojciech Łebkowski; Urszula Łebkowska
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2015-01-28

8.  The effect of void creation prior to vertebroplasty on intravertebral pressure and cement distribution in cadaveric spines with simulated metastases.

Authors:  Ka Li; Jun Yan; Qiang Yang; Zhenfeng Li; Jianmin Li
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  The Effect of Kyphoplasty on Mortality in Symptomatic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Review.

Authors:  Swamy Kurra; Umesh Metkar; Isador H Lieberman; William F Lavelle
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-10-15

10.  Surgical treatment of secondary fractures after percutaneous vertebroplasty: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Jiang-Jun Zhu; Dong-Sheng Zhang; Su-Liang Lou; Yong-Hong Yang
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.