Literature DB >> 21358150

Surgical outcome and postoperative work status of lumbar discogenic pain following transforaminal interbody fusion.

Toshiyuki Takahashi1, Junya Hanakita, Manabu Minami, Fumiaki Honda, Keita Kuraishi.   

Abstract

The clinical outcome and resumption of work were investigated in 21 patients with lumbar discogenic pain (15 males and 6 females, mean age 37.2 years), who failed to respond to intensive conservative therapy, treated by transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) augmented with the pedicle screw system from January 2005 to December 2007. Perioperative assessment was performed using the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score, the Oswestry Disability Index, and the visual analogue scale (VAS). Type of occupation and work status of the patients were also assessed before and after surgery. Preoperative occupation was divided into two groups according to the work content (heavy labor vs. light labor). Follow-up period was mean 26.1 months, and greater than 1 year in all patients. Perioperative assessment showed postoperative improvement with statistical significance. Recovery rates at final follow-up examination were 53% of the mJOA score and 65% of the VAS. This study showed that postoperative overall resumption rate was 90%. However, only 23% of the heavy labor group returned to the previous work compared with 71% of the light labor group. TLIF is thought to be a safe and effective technique in patients with intractable chronic lumbar discogenic pain with an acceptable overall work resumption rate, whereas complete return to previous jobs was limited in the heavy labor group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21358150     DOI: 10.2176/nmc.51.101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)        ISSN: 0470-8105            Impact factor:   1.742


  4 in total

Review 1.  Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF.

Authors:  Ralph J Mobbs; Kevin Phan; Greg Malham; Kevin Seex; Prashanth J Rao
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-12

2.  A less invasive treatment by a full-endoscopic spine surgery for adjacent segment disease after lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Hiroki Iwai; Yasushi Oshima; Tomoaki Kitagawa; Hirokazu Inoue; Yuichi Takano; Hirohiko Inanami; Hisashi Koga
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-06

Review 3.  A systematic literature review of time to return to work and narcotic use after lumbar spinal fusion using minimal invasive and open surgery techniques.

Authors:  Xuan Wang; Benny Borgman; Simona Vertuani; Jonas Nilsson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Lumbar alignment and clinical outcome after single level asymmetrical transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis with local coronal imbalance.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Takahashi; Junya Hanakita; Mizuki Watanabe; Taigo Kawaoka; Noriyoshi Takebe; Takahiro Kitahara
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 1.742

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.