Literature DB >> 21358088

Fluorescence spectroscopy for noninvasive early diagnosis of oral mucosal malignant and potentially malignant lesions.

Pankaj Chaturvedi1, Shovan K Majumder, Hemant Krishna, Sidramesh Muttagi, Pradeep K Gupta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We report the results of a clinical in vivo study to evaluate the potential of fluorescence spectroscopy for differential diagnosis of oral mucosal malignant and potentially malignant lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study involved 26 healthy volunteers and 144 patients enrolled for routine medical examination of the oral cavity at the outpatient department of the Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai. In vivo autofluorescence spectra were recorded using a N2 laser based portable fluorimeter developed in-house. The different tissue sites investigated belonged to either of the four histopathologic categories: 1) squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), 2) oral sub-mucous fibrosis (OSMF), 3) leukoplakia (LP) and 4) normal squamous tissue. A multivariate statistical algorithm capable of direct multi-class classification was used to predict pathological designations.
RESULTS: With respect to histopathology as the "gold standard", the diagnostic algorithm was found to provide an accuracy of 82, 76, 81 and 85% based on leave-one-patient-out cross-validation in classifying the oral tissue spectra into four different pathology classes - SCC, OSMF, LP, and normal squamous tissue - respectively. When the algorithm was employed for delineating the normal oral tissues from all the abnormal oral tissues including SCC, OSMF and LP put together, a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 100% were obtained.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that it is possible to objectively classify the oral tissue into different pathology classes based on their in vivo autofluorescence spectra. Thus, the technique can potentially improve oral screening efforts in low resource settings where clinical expertise and resources are limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21358088     DOI: 10.4103/0973-1482.77097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Ther        ISSN: 1998-4138            Impact factor:   1.805


  7 in total

Review 1.  Fluorescence lifetime techniques in medical applications.

Authors:  Laura Marcu
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Differences in Spectroscopic Properties of Saliva Taken From Normal Subjects and Oral Cancer Patients: Comparison Studies.

Authors:  Benjamaporn Supawat; Khin TheNu Aye; Janejirarak Ritpanja; Wiphaporn Nueangwong; Suchart Kothan; Jie Pan; Montree Tungjai
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 2.217

3.  Quantitative risk stratification of oral leukoplakia with exfoliative cytology.

Authors:  Yao Liu; Jianying Li; Xiaoyong Liu; Xudong Liu; Waqaar Khawar; Xinyan Zhang; Fan Wang; Xiaoxin Chen; Zheng Sun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Quantitative prediction of oral cancer risk in patients with oral leukoplakia.

Authors:  Yao Liu; Yicheng Li; Yue Fu; Tong Liu; Xiaoyong Liu; Xinyan Zhang; Jie Fu; Xiaobing Guan; Tong Chen; Xiaoxin Chen; Zheng Sun
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-11

Review 5.  Recent Advances and the Potential for Clinical Use of Autofluorescence Detection of Extra-Ophthalmic Tissues.

Authors:  Jonas Wizenty; Teresa Schumann; Donna Theil; Martin Stockmann; Johann Pratschke; Frank Tacke; Felix Aigner; Tilo Wuensch
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 6.  Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy in Oral Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Rong Wang; Yong Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Biopsy Diagnosis of Oral Carcinoma by the Combination of Morphological and Spectral Methods Based on Embedded Relay Lens Microscopic Hyperspectral Imaging System.

Authors:  Mang Ou-Yang; Yao-Fang Hsieh; Cheng-Chung Lee
Journal:  J Med Biol Eng       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 1.553

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.