BACKGROUND: Expectations of patients regarding their prospects for recovery have been shown to predict subsequent physical and social functioning. Evidence regarding the impact of expectations on clinical outcomes is limited. METHODS: At the inpatient service of a tertiary care hospital, we evaluated beliefs of patients undergoing coronary angiography about their prognosis as predictors of long-term survival and 1-year functional status. Baseline assessments, including a measure of expectations for recovery, were obtained during hospitalization with mortality follow-up for approximately 15 years. Patients with significant obstructive coronary artery disease were interviewed while in the hospital and enrolled in follow-up. Functional status was assessed at baseline and 1 year later with questionnaires reflecting physical capabilities. Analyses controlled for age, sex, disease severity, comorbidities, treatments, demographics, depressive symptoms, social support, and functional status. There were 1637 total deaths, 885 from cardiovascular causes, in the 2818 patients in these analyses. The outcomes were total mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and 1-year functional status. RESULTS: Expectations were positively associated with survival after controlling for background and clinical disease indicators. For a difference equivalent to an interquartile range of expectations, the hazard ratio (HR) for total mortality was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-0.82) and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.69-0.83) for cardiovascular mortality. The HRs were 0.83 (95% CI, 0.76-0.91) and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.70-0.89) with further adjustments for demographic and psychosocial covariates. Similar associations (P < .001) were observed for functional status. CONCLUSION: Recovery expectations at baseline were positively associated with long-term survival and functioning in patients with coronary artery disease.
BACKGROUND: Expectations of patients regarding their prospects for recovery have been shown to predict subsequent physical and social functioning. Evidence regarding the impact of expectations on clinical outcomes is limited. METHODS: At the inpatient service of a tertiary care hospital, we evaluated beliefs of patients undergoing coronary angiography about their prognosis as predictors of long-term survival and 1-year functional status. Baseline assessments, including a measure of expectations for recovery, were obtained during hospitalization with mortality follow-up for approximately 15 years. Patients with significant obstructive coronary artery disease were interviewed while in the hospital and enrolled in follow-up. Functional status was assessed at baseline and 1 year later with questionnaires reflecting physical capabilities. Analyses controlled for age, sex, disease severity, comorbidities, treatments, demographics, depressive symptoms, social support, and functional status. There were 1637 total deaths, 885 from cardiovascular causes, in the 2818 patients in these analyses. The outcomes were total mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and 1-year functional status. RESULTS: Expectations were positively associated with survival after controlling for background and clinical disease indicators. For a difference equivalent to an interquartile range of expectations, the hazard ratio (HR) for total mortality was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-0.82) and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.69-0.83) for cardiovascular mortality. The HRs were 0.83 (95% CI, 0.76-0.91) and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.70-0.89) with further adjustments for demographic and psychosocial covariates. Similar associations (P < .001) were observed for functional status. CONCLUSION: Recovery expectations at baseline were positively associated with long-term survival and functioning in patients with coronary artery disease.
Authors: M A Hlatky; W J Rogers; I Johnstone; D Boothroyd; M M Brooks; B Pitt; G Reeder; T Ryan; H Smith; P Whitlow; R Wiens; D B Mark Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1997-01-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Beverly H Brummett; Daniel B Mark; Ilene C Siegler; Redford B Williams; Michael A Babyak; Nancy E Clapp-Channing; John C Barefoot Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2005 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Jacob P Feigal; Stephen H Boyle; Zainab Samad; Eric J Velazquez; Jennifer L Wilson; Richard C Becker; Redford B Williams; Cynthia M Kuhn; Thomas L Ortel; Joseph G Rogers; Christopher M O'Connor; Wei Jiang Journal: J Psychosom Res Date: 2016-11-29 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Stephanie Booth-Kewley; Emily A Schmied; Robyn M Highfill-McRoy; Todd C Sander; Steve J Blivin; Cedric F Garland Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2014-06
Authors: Charlotte J Auer; Julia A Glombiewski; Bettina K Doering; Alexander Winkler; Johannes A C Laferton; Elizabeth Broadbent; Winfried Rief Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2016-02