| Literature DB >> 21357773 |
Silvia Farinati1, Giovanni DalCrso, Monica Panigati, Antonella Furini.
Abstract
The effects of plant-microbe interactions between the hyperaccumulator Arabidopsis halleri and eight bacterial strains, isolated from the rhizosphere of A. halleri plants grown in a cadmium- and zinc-contaminated site, were analysed for shoot metal accumulation, shoot proteome, and the transcription of genes involved in plant metal homeostasis and hyperaccumulation. Cadmium and zinc concentrations were lower in the shoots of plants cultivated in the presence of these metals plus the selected bacterial strains compared with plants grown solely with these metals or, as previously reported, with plants grown with these metals plus the autochthonous rhizosphere-derived microorganisms. The shoot proteome of plants cultivated in the presence of these selected bacterial strains plus metals, showed an increased abundance of photosynthesis- and abiotic stress-related proteins (e.g. subunits of the photosynthetic complexes, Rubisco, superoxide dismutase, and malate dehydrogenase) counteracted by a decreased amount of plant defence-related proteins (e.g. endochitinases, vegetative storage proteins, and β-glucosidase). The transcription of several homeostasis genes was modulated by the microbial communities and by Cd and Zn content in the shoot. Altogether these results highlight the importance of plant-microbe interactions in plant protein expression and metal accumulation and emphasize the possibility of exploiting microbial consortia for increasing or decreasing shoot metal content.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21357773 PMCID: PMC3130167 DOI: 10.1093/jxb/err015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Bot ISSN: 0022-0957 Impact factor: 6.992
Forward and reverse primers used in real-time PCR analysis
| Primer name | Primer sequence (5′–3′) |
| AhPCS1-F | GTCACTTCCATCAAACTTCAAC |
| AhPCS1-R | CTTGACTTCTCCTCTGCGCT |
| AhHMA4-F | TCAGCTTGCGTCGCCATTGT |
| AhHMA4-R | ACCACAGGGACATCCACTGA |
| AhNAS3-F | AACACATGGCTCCTGGTGCT |
| AhNAS3-R | CCTCGAACCCCTGAAGATCA |
| AhZIP6-F | ACGATGATCAGAACCCGAATG |
| AhZIP6-R | CAATGCAATTAGATCAACCAAG |
| AhMHX-F | AGACACTCCACCCGATTCTG |
| AhMHX-R | TTCCAACGTTATTGCATCCAC |
| AhMTP1-F | ACATAGCCATAGCCATGGGG |
| AhMTP1-R | TGCTGGTCCTCTCCATGACT |
Phylogenetic affiliation of bacteria strains isolated from the rhizosphere of A. halleri plants grown in heavy metal polluted site
| Strain | Closest NCBI match | (Accession no.) | % Homology | Identification experiment | Phylogenetic group |
| A | (FN600411) | 100% | Fenamiphos and oxamyl degrading bacteria | ||
| (FJ947052) | 99% | Isolated from sewage of waste water treatment | |||
| Uncultured bacterium clone | (HM335248) | 99% | Isolated from human clinical samples | unclassified | |
| B | (AY468479) | 98% | Isolated from diseased aquatic animals | ||
| (AB461832) | 97% | Isolated from stems of field-grown soybeans | |||
| (NR025387) | 97% | Isolated from dairy environment | |||
| C | (DQ985274) | 100% | Isolated from wetland soil | ||
| (DQ530068) | 99% | Rhizosphere bacteria | |||
| Bacterium | (AY822563) | 99% | Bacteria associated with sand dune plants | Unclassified | |
| D | (DQ530125) | 98% | Rhizosphere bacteria | ||
| (EF601823) | 98% | Soil bacteria from alpine grassland | |||
| Uncultured bacterium clone | (FJ935614) | 98% | Maple sap bacteria | Unclassified | |
| E | (AM284997) | 99% | Arsenic-resistant soil bacteria | ||
| (AB478957) | 99% | Isolated from clinical samples | |||
| (CP001966) | 99% | Isolated from soil and sludge | |||
| F | (CP001846) | 99% | Isolated from clinical samples | ||
| (GU594295) | 99% | Isolated from clinical samples | |||
| Uncultured bacterium clone | (EU778474) | 99% | Mammals gut bacteria | Unclassified | |
| G | (EF153191) | 99% | R-limonene-degrading bacteria | ||
| (DQ831000) | 99% | Carbofuran-degrading bacteria | |||
| Uncultured bacterium clone | (AB176242) | 99% | Isolated from sub-seafloor hydrothermal field | ||
| H | (DQ086779) | 99% | Isolated from potato tubers | ||
| (AY688358) | 99% | Isolated from human clinical samples | |||
| Uncultured bacterium clone | (HM276345) | 98% | Isolated from human clinical samples | Unclassified |
Tentative identification and percent similarity values were determined by BLAST and are based on approximately 500 bp of the 16S rDNA gene sequence for each clone (NCBI nucleotide database).
Environmental matrices where the isolates are mostly attributed.
Classification according to the Bergey's Manual of systematic bacteriology (2nd edn).
Fig. 1.A. halleri plants grown for a month in the greenhouse subjected to different treatments. In Hoagland nutrient solution (Ctr); with the addition of 1 mM CdSO4 and 10 mM ZnSO4 (Mt); and with the addition of 1 mM CdSO4 and 10 mM ZnSO4 plus eight selected bacterial strains (Mt+8S). (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)
Shoot fresh weight and leaf chlorophyll content of plants submitted to different treatments
| Treatment | Shoot Fresh Weight (g) | Chlorophyll (mg Chl |
| Ctr | 1.6±0.2 | 0.983±0.065 a |
| Mt | 2.1±0.2 | 1.247±0.023 b |
| Mt+8S | 1.8±0.2 | 1.022±.076 a |
| Mt+Mc | 1.9±0.2 | 1.456±0.114 b |
Untreated control plants (Ctr); plants treated with 1 mM CdSO4 and 10 mM ZnSO4 (Mt); plants treated with 1 mM CdSO4 and 10 mM ZnSO4 and the addition of the eight selected bacterial strains (Mt+8S); plants treated with 1 mM CdSO4 and 10 mM ZnSO4 plus autochthonous rhizosphere-derived microorganisms (Mt+Mc). Values are the average of 10 plants for three replicates ±SE. Chlorophyll content, different letters correspond to significant differences (P <0.05).
Results also reported in Farinati .
Fig. 2.Cd and Zn content in shoots of plants submitted to different treatments. Untreated control plants (Ctr); plants treated with 1 mM CdSO4 and 10 mM ZnSO4 (Mt); plants treated with 1 mM CdSO4 and 10 mM ZnSO4 and the addition of the eight selected bacterial strains (Mt+8S); and plants treated with 1 mM CdSO4 and 10 mM ZnSO4 plus autochthonous rhizosphere-derived microorganisms (Mt+Mc). nd: not determined. With the exception of Mt+8S, results are also reported in Farinati . Values shown represent the average of ten plants for three biological replicates (all values are highly statistically significant, P <0.001). Bar, SE.
Shoot proteomic analysis of A. halleri plants subjected to different treatments
| No | SSP | Protein name | AC number (gi NCBI) | MW (kDa)/p | Peptide | Mascot | Fold variations | ||||
| and reference organism | count | score | Mt+8S versus Ctr | Mt+8S versus Mt | |||||||
| 1 | 1204 | PSBP1 | At1g06680 | 28078/6.90 | 11 | 445 | ↑4.45 | ||||
| 2 | 2204b | PSBP1 | At1g06680 | 20078/6.90 | 10 | 369 | ↑2.67 | ||||
| 3 | 5101 | PSBP2 | At2g30790 | 27704/9.08 | 6 | 204 | ↓2.43 | ||||
| 4 | 1302 | PSBO2 | At3g50820 | 34998/5.92 | 9 | 388 | ↑2.43 | ||||
| 5 | 1303 | PSBO2 | At3g50820 | 34998/5.92 | 15 | 775 | ↑2.58 | ||||
| 6 | 1311 | PSBO1-like | At4g37230 | 35114/5.68 | 17 | 672 | n.i. | ||||
| 7 | 2407 | HCF136 | At5g23120 | 44076/6.79 | 9 | 417 | ↑3.27 | ||||
| 8 | 2103 | δ-subunit ATPase | At4g09650 | 25653/9.04 | 7 | 346 | ↑2.78 | ||||
| 9 | 4004 | β-subunit ATPase | AtCg00480 | 52625/5.28 | 5 | 194 | ↑3.02 | ||||
| 10 | 2601a | β-subunit ATPase | AtCg00480 | 52905/5.10 | 14 | 749 | ↑3.0 | ||||
| 11 | 1106 | Rubisco: large subunit | AtCg00490 | 52922/5.88 | 5 | 148 | ↑6.03 | ||||
| 12 | 4611 | Rubisco: large subunit | ArhiCp028 | 52933/5.96 | 15 | 614 | ↑2.93 | ||||
| 13 | 5704 | Rubisco: large subunit | ArhiCp028 | 52933/5.96 | 19 | 761 | ↑2.44 | ||||
| 14 | 3008 | Rubisco: small subunit | At5g38430 | 20273/7.59 | 4 | 160 | ↑7.20 | ||||
| 15 | 4001 | Rubisco: small subunit | gi|406727 | 20178/8.24 | 4 | 95 | ↑3.48 | ||||
| 16 | 8001 | Rubisco: small subunit | At1g67090 | 20448/7.59 | 6 | 253 | ↑2.41 | ||||
| 17 | 6007 | Rubisco: small subunit | At5g38430 | 20273/7.59 | 5 | 223 | ↑2.04 | ||||
| 18 | 1505 | Phosphoribulokinase | At1g32060 | 44436/5.71 | 13 | 475 | ↑2.16 | ↑2.13 | |||
| 19 | 2503 | Rubisco activase | At2g39730 | 52006/5.69 | 10 | 446 | ↑2.4 | ||||
| 20 | 7507 | AtMDAR1 | At3g52880 | 46458/6.41 | 9 | 439 | ↓2.5 | ||||
| 21 | 3504 | AtMDAR2 | At5g03630 | 47450/5.24 | 16 | 496 | ↓2 | ||||
| 22 | 4203 | Fe-Superoxide | At4g25100 | 25409/6.30 | 3 | 165 | ↑2.16 | ||||
| dismutase, FSD1 | |||||||||||
| 23 | 4101 | Allene oxide | At3g25770 | 21199/5.65 | 6 | 247 | ↓4.54 | ↓4.05 | |||
| cyclase | |||||||||||
| 24 | 7307 | Endochitinase | gi|7798632 | 32004/5.93 | 5 | 156 | ↓5 | ||||
| (Class I) | |||||||||||
| 25 | 8005 | Endochitinase | gi|7798632 | 32004/5.93 | 3 | 133 | ↓3.85 | ||||
| (Class I) | |||||||||||
| 26 | 5003 | Malate dehydrogenase | At1g04410 | 35548/6.11 | 3 | 97 | ↑5.13 | ||||
| 27 | 6101 | Germin-like protein | At5g20630 | 21849/6.81 | 2 | 72 | ↑2.44 | ↑2 | |||
| AtGER3 | |||||||||||
| 28 | 5102 | Lipocalin, TIL1 | At5g58070 | 21421/5.97 | 2 | 84 | ↑2.65 | ||||
| 29 | 2601b | Enolase | At2g36530 | 47689/5.54 | 9 | 433 | ↑3.0 | ||||
| LOS2 | |||||||||||
| 30 | 2204a | Plastidic chaperonin, | At5g20720 | 26785/8.86 | 11 | 572 | ↑2.67 | ||||
| AtCPN20 | |||||||||||
| 31 | 5209 | Vegetative storage | At5g24770 | 29806/6.17 | 6 | 239 | ↓4.16 | ||||
| protein, VSP2 | |||||||||||
| 32 | 5710 | α-subunit ATPase | AtMg01190 | 55011/6.23 | 20 | 1046 | ↓2.27 | ||||
| mitochondrion | |||||||||||
| 33 | 6712 | β-glucosidase 1 | At1g52400 | 60462/6.89 | 11 | 383 | ↓6.25 | ↓2.48 | |||
| 34 | 6713 | β-glucosidase 1 | At1g52400 | 60462/6.89 | 13 | 434 | ↓<10 | ||||
| 35 | 7702 | β-glucosidase 1 | At1g52400 | 60462/6.89 | 7 | 228 | ↓3.45 | ||||
Untreated control plants (Ctr); plants treated with 1 mM CdSO4 and 10 mM ZnSO4 (Mt); plants treated with 1 mM CdSO4 and 10 mM ZnSO4 and the addition of the eight selected bacterial strains (Mt+8S).
Fold variations in spot abundance between the different treatments and the corresponding control. No value in the table indicate that, for the corresponding spot, was not possible to identify a change that exceeds both a fold of variation >2 and a P <0.05.
Proteins whose expression pattern have been confirmed by Western analysis.
Newly induced.
Fig. 3.Shoot proteome analysis. (A) Standard 2-DE map of proteins extracted from A. halleri shoots corresponding to the Mt+8S sample, with an average of 346±49 spots (Ctr and Mt samples showed an average of 562±21 and 377±11 spots, respectively). The 35 protein spots showing statistically significant differences between the conditions tested are marked by an open circle and numbered according to Table 4. (B) Close-up view of spots (indicated by arrows) representative of differentially expressed proteins (P <0.05) between control and treatments. (C, left) Validation of five differentially expressed proteins by Western blot (a representative gel of three repetition is reported). Ponceau-Red staining is shown for control of protein loading. (C, right) Densitometric analysis of immunoblot signals.
Fig. 4.Expression analysis of metal homeostasis and hyperaccumulator genes. AhZIP6, AhMTP1, AhMHX, AhNAS3, AhPCS1, and AhHMA4 transcript levels in the shoot and root of A. halleri plants subjected to different treatments, by real-time PCR. The experiment was carried out in triplicate (±SE).
Fig. 5.Measurement of Cd and Zn content in bacteria supernatants and rinsing solutions. (A) Cd content of singly grown bacterial strains (A–H), as indicated in Table 2 and of the eight selected bacterial strains grown together (Cd+8S). (B) Zn content of singly grown bacterial strains (A–H), as indicated in Table 2 and of the eight selected bacterial strains grown together (Zn+8S). Nut: nutrient solution. Cd+nut and Zn+nut were added as positive control. Data are the mean ±SD (n=3). Differences between means were scored for significance according to the Duncan test. Values sharing a common letter are not significantly different at P <0.05.
Fig. 6.Measurement of Cd and Zn content in shoots of A. halleri plants. (A) Cd content (B) Zn content in shoots of plants grown with 1 mM CdSO4 and 10 mM ZnSO4 plus the eight bacterial strains (added singly: A–H); added together (Mt+8S); without bacteria (Mt). Data are the mean ±SD (n=3), subjected to analysis of variance. Differences between means were scored for significance according to the Duncan test. Values sharing a common letter are not significantly different at P <0.05.