OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify characteristics of parents who believe in sexual disinhibition and that Pap smears can safely be stopped after females receive the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. METHODS: We surveyed 647 parents of adolescent girls living in areas of North Carolina with elevated rates of cervical cancer. We report data primarily from a survey conducted in October and November 2008. RESULTS: Only 16% (101/647) of parents agreed that teenage girls who receive HPV vaccine may be more likely to have sex. Parents who believed in vaccine-induced sexual disinhibition were more likely to be older (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.09 to 3.26) or report conservative political views (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.37 to 3.73). Parents were less likely to believe in sexual disinhibition if they had greater knowledge about HPV vaccine (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.85) or if their daughters had received HPV vaccine (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.57). While few parents (5%; 30/647) believed that women could safely stop getting regular Pap smears after receiving HPV vaccine, this belief was somewhat more common among racial and ethnic minority parents (16%) and among fathers (13%). CONCLUSIONS: Few parents believed that HPV vaccine is likely to lead to increased sexual activity among females or reduce the need for vaccinated women to have regular Pap smears in the future. Characterising parents who hold beliefs in behavioural disinhibition is important as clinicians encountering parents in practice may desire information about this population.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify characteristics of parents who believe in sexual disinhibition and that Pap smears can safely be stopped after females receive the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. METHODS: We surveyed 647 parents of adolescent girls living in areas of North Carolina with elevated rates of cervical cancer. We report data primarily from a survey conducted in October and November 2008. RESULTS: Only 16% (101/647) of parents agreed that teenage girls who receive HPV vaccine may be more likely to have sex. Parents who believed in vaccine-induced sexual disinhibition were more likely to be older (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.09 to 3.26) or report conservative political views (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.37 to 3.73). Parents were less likely to believe in sexual disinhibition if they had greater knowledge about HPV vaccine (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.85) or if their daughters had received HPV vaccine (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.57). While few parents (5%; 30/647) believed that women could safely stop getting regular Pap smears after receiving HPV vaccine, this belief was somewhat more common among racial and ethnic minority parents (16%) and among fathers (13%). CONCLUSIONS: Few parents believed that HPV vaccine is likely to lead to increased sexual activity among females or reduce the need for vaccinated women to have regular Pap smears in the future. Characterising parents who hold beliefs in behavioural disinhibition is important as clinicians encountering parents in practice may desire information about this population.
Authors: Debra H Bernat; Scott B Harpin; Marla E Eisenberg; Linda H Bearinger; Michael D Resnick Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2009-06-12 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Noel T Brewer; Sami L Gottlieb; Paul L Reiter; Annie-Laurie McRee; Nicole Liddon; Lauri Markowitz; Jennifer S Smith Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Meg Watson; Mona Saraiya; Vicki Benard; Steven S Coughlin; Lisa Flowers; Vilma Cokkinides; Molly Schwenn; Youjie Huang; Anna Giuliano Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-11-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Annie-Laurie McRee; Noel T Brewer; Paul L Reiter; Sami L Gottlieb; Jennifer S Smith Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Gina S Ogilvie; Valencia P Remple; Fawziah Marra; Shelly A McNeil; Monika Naus; Karen L Pielak; Thomas G Ehlen; Simon R Dobson; Deborah M Money; David M Patrick Journal: CMAJ Date: 2007-12-04 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Jessica Hughes; Joan R Cates; Nicole Liddon; Jennifer S Smith; Sami L Gottlieb; Noel T Brewer Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2009-02-03 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Chantal Sauvageau; Bernard Duval; Vladimir Gilca; France Lavoie; Manale Ouakki Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2007-10-25 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Tanya L Kowalczyk Mullins; Anne M Griffioen; Susan Glynn; Gregory D Zimet; Susan L Rosenthal; J Dennis Fortenberry; Jessica A Kahn Journal: Vaccine Date: 2013-08-03 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Paul L Reiter; Annie-Laurie McRee; Jessica K Pepper; Melissa B Gilkey; Kayoll V Galbraith; Noel T Brewer Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-06-13 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Tanya L Kowalczyk Mullins; Gregory D Zimet; Susan L Rosenthal; Charlene Morrow; Lili Ding; Bin Huang; Jessica A Kahn Journal: Vaccine Date: 2016-06-10 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Tanya L Kowalczyk Mullins; Susan L Rosenthal; Gregory D Zimet; Lili Ding; Charlene Morrow; Bin Huang; Jessica A Kahn Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2017-12-02 Impact factor: 5.012