Literature DB >> 21357522

Prostate cancer ablation with transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound: assessment of tissue destruction with contrast-enhanced US.

Olivier Rouvière1, Ludivine Glas, Nicolas Girouin, Florence Mège-Lechevallier, Albert Gelet, Emmanuelle Dantony, Muriel Rabilloud, Jean-Yves Chapelon, Denis Lyonnet.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess contrast material-enhanced ultrasonographic (US) findings seen after high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation of prostate cancer and correlate the US findings with post-HIFU biopsy findings.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was ethics committee approved. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Twenty-eight patients referred for HIFU prostate cancer ablation underwent contrast-enhanced prostate US before treatment, gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and repeat contrast-enhanced US 1-3 days after treatment, and contrast-enhanced US-guided biopsy 30-45 days after treatment. The contrast-enhanced US enhancement patterns of the biopsy sites--assigned a score of S0 for no enhancement, S1 for mild and/or patchy enhancement, or S2 for marked enhancement--were compared with corresponding biopsy findings, which were assigned a score of B0 for necrosis and/or fibrosis without viable prostate gland tissue, B1 for vascularized tissue without viable gland tissue, or B2 for viable gland tissue (benign or malignant). Then, six additional patients underwent contrast-enhanced prostate US 15-30 minutes and 1 day after HIFU ablation, and the results of these two US examinations were compared.
RESULTS: Contrast-enhanced US performed on days 1-3 and days 30-45 after HIFU ablation depicted a large devascularized zone with peripheral enhancing areas that were localized anteriorly in all 28 patients, posteriorly in nine, laterally in five, and at the apex in 20 patients. MR findings were concordant. At biopsy, viable gland tissue was found at nine (6.2%) of 146 S0 sites, 10 (34%) of 29 S1 sites, and 44 (60%) of 73 S2 sites. The odds ratios for finding viable tissue (score B1 or B2) at S1 and S2 sites as opposed to S0 sites were 21 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6, 71) and 73 (95% CI: 22, 243), respectively (P < .0001). Contrast-enhanced US performed 15-30 minutes and 1 day after treatment in the six additional patients had similar findings.
CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced US is a promising tool for distinguishing between ablated (devascularized) and viable (enhancing) tissue immediately after HIFU treatment. RSNA, 2011

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21357522     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11101489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  9 in total

Review 1.  Academic radiology in the new health care delivery environment.

Authors:  Aliya Qayyum; John-Paul J Yu; Akash P Kansagra; Nathaniel von Fischer; Daniel Costa; Matthew Heller; Stamatis Kantartzis; R Scooter Plowman; Jason Itri
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 2.  Ultrasonography in prostate cancer: current roles and potential applications in radiorecurrent disease.

Authors:  James S Rosoff; Sandip M Prasad; Stephen J Savage
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  3D Registration of mpMRI for Assessment of Prostate Cancer Focal Therapy.

Authors:  Clément Orczyk; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Artem Mikheev; Arnauld Villers; Myriam Bernaudin; Samir S Taneja; Samuel Valable; Henry Rusinek
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 4.  Prostate focused ultrasound focal therapy--imaging for the future.

Authors:  Olivier Rouvière; Albert Gelet; Sébastien Crouzet; Jean-Yves Chapelon
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  Contrast-Enhanced Transrectal Ultrasound in Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Akbar N Ashrafi; Nima Nassiri; Inderbir S Gill; Mittul Gulati; Daniel Park; Andre L de Castro Abreu
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 2.862

6.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound evaluation of pancreatic cancer xenografts in nude mice after irradiation with sub-threshold focused ultrasound for tumor ablation.

Authors:  Yi Hui Gao; Lei Wu; Rui Wang; Qian Guo; Yi Ni Chen; Bing Hu; Li Xin Jiang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-06-06

7.  Multiparametric dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Rogier R Wildeboer; Arnoud W Postema; Libertario Demi; Maarten P J Kuenen; Hessel Wijkstra; Massimo Mischi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  New clinical application of high-intensity focused ultrasound: local control of synovial sarcoma.

Authors:  Xiaoye Hu; Hongke Cai; Meiqi Zhou; Haifei He; Wei Tian; Yue Hu; Lirong Chen; Yongchuan Deng
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 9.  Focal therapy for prostate cancer: rationale and treatment opportunities.

Authors:  V Kasivisvanathan; M Emberton; H U Ahmed
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 4.126

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.