| Literature DB >> 21357472 |
Michael J Jurczak1, Hui-Young Lee, Andreas L Birkenfeld, Francois R Jornayvaz, David W Frederick, Rebecca L Pongratz, Xiaoxian Zhao, Gilbert W Moeckel, Varman T Samuel, Jean M Whaley, Gerald I Shulman, Richard G Kibbey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Inhibition of the Na(+)-glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT2) is currently being pursued as an insulin-independent treatment for diabetes; however, the behavioral and metabolic consequences of SGLT2 deletion are unknown. Here, we used a SGLT2 knockout mouse to investigate the effect of increased renal glucose excretion on glucose homeostasis, insulin sensitivity, and pancreatic β-cell function. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: SGLT2 knockout mice were fed regular chow or a high-fat diet (HFD) for 4 weeks, or backcrossed onto the db/db background. The analysis used metabolic cages, glucose tolerance tests, euglycemic and hyperglycemic clamps, as well as isolated islet and perifusion studies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21357472 PMCID: PMC3046850 DOI: 10.2337/db10-1328
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes ISSN: 0012-1797 Impact factor: 9.461
Physiologic overview of SGLT2−/− mice
| Body weight | Body fat | Kidney weight | Plasma BUN | Plasma creatinine | Urine output | Glucosuria | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mouse | (g) | (%) | (mg/g) | (mg/dL) | (mg/dL) | (mL/day) | (mg/day) |
| WT | 29.4 ± 0.7 | 6.9 ± 0.7 | 6.55 ± 0.42 | 23.2 ± 0.3 | 0.074 ± 0.001 | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 0.9 ± 0.3 |
| SGLT2−/− | 26.7 ± 0.6 | 7.4 ± 0.3 | 6.49 ± 0.14 | 23.8 ± 1.1 | 0.077 ± 0.007 | 6.7 ± 0.4 | 502 ± 30 |
| HFD/WT | 35.0 ± 0.7 | 26.4 ± 1.2 | ND | 20.8 ± 0.7 | 0.103 ± 0.005 | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.3 |
| HFD/SGLT2−/− | 33.0 ± 1.0 | 22.3 ± 1.9 | ND | 18.8 ± 0.7 | 0.119 ± 0.007 | 5.4 ± 0.5 | 431 ± 31 |
Data were collected from 16-week-old, ad libitum fed mice. Kidney weight represents the weight of one kidney corrected by body weight. Mice were housed in custom cages for 24 h for urine output and glucosuria measurements. HFD was fed for 4 weeks. n = 12–16 per genotype for body weight and fat data; n = 6–8 for remaining data.
*P < 0.05;
†P < 0.001 for comparison of WT with SGLT2−/− for each diet.
Data analyzed by Student t test.
ND, not done.
FIG. 1.SGLT2−/− mice are protected from HFD-induced hyperglycemia and glucose intolerance. A: Dark cycle averages are shown for metabolic cage data for activity, energy expenditure (EE), feeding, drinking, and respiratory quotient (VCO2/VO2) for WT and SGLT2−/− mice. B: Fasting plasma glucose values for RC and HFD WT and SGLT2−/− mice. C: Fasting plasma insulin values. D: Changes in plasma glucose following intraperitoneal injection of 1-mg/kg glucose (WT vs. SGLT2−/− P < 0.01 for RC and P < 0.001 for HFD). E: Changes in plasma insulin levels during experiment shown in D (WT vs. SGLT2−/− P < 0.01 for RC and HFD). F: AUC for glucose calculated from data in D. G: AUC for insulin calculated from data in E. n = 8–12 mice per group. Data were analyzed by unpaired, two-tailed Student t test. Significance between curves was determined by two-way ANOVA. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001. Data represent the mean ± SEM.
FIG. 2.Increased glucosuria is associated with decreased fasting plasma glucose and insulin in db/db-SGLT2−/− mice. A: Body weights are shown for db/db-SGLT+/+, db/db-SGLT2+/−, and db/db-SLGT2−/− mice at approximately 18 weeks of age. B: Percentage of body fat determined by proton nuclear magnetic resonance. C: Urine volume at 24 h. D: Glucosuria at 24 h (n = 5–6 per group). E: Fasting plasma glucose level. F: Insulin levels. G: Plasma fatty acid concentrations from overnight fasted mice. n = 7–9 per group; n = 15–20 per genotype except where noted. Data were analyzed by Student t test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001. Data represent the mean ± SEM.
Hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp studies
| Mouse | Plasma glucose(mg/dL) | Glucose infusion rate(mg · kg−1 · min−1) | Endogenous glucose production(mg · kg−1 · min−1) | Whole-body glucose uptake(mg · kg−1 · min−1) | Skeletal muscle glucose uptake(nmol · g−1 · min−1) | White adipose glucose uptake(nmol · g−1 · min−1) | Insulin(μU/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGLT2+/+ | 149 ± 13 | 2.9 ± 0.8 | 21.3 ± 1.2 | 24.1 ± 0.9 | 135 ± 22 | 24.7 ± 1.8 | 1211 ± 138 |
| SGLT2+/− | 152 ± 18 | 3.9 ± 1.2 | 19.3 ± 1.9 | 23.3 ± 1.2 | 134 ± 18 | 27.1 ± 2.2 | 1178 ± 105 |
| SGLT2−/− | 139 ± 8 | 8.0 ± 0.8 | 16.2 ± 2.1 | 24.2 ± 1.9 | 109 ± 18 | 25.2 ± 3.4 | 1268 ± 158 |
Whole-body and tissue-specific glucose metabolism during hyperinsulinemic infusion. The db/db-SGLT2+/+ (n = 9), db/db-SGLT2+/− (n = 8), and db/db-SGLT2−/− (n = 7). Data analyzed by Student t test.
*P < 0.01;
†P < 0.05 compared with db/db-SGLT2+/+.
FIG. 3.The db/db-SGLT2−/− mice display improved β-cell function in vivo. A: Glucose infusion rates (GIR) required to maintain hyperglycemia during 120-min clamp experiment. B: Changes in plasma glucose during the clamp in response to GIR in A. C: AUC calculations are shown for the change in plasma glucose (Δ glucose) from baseline during the clamp. D: Changes in plasma insulin in response to changes in plasma glucose in B (db/db-SGLT2+/+ vs. db/db-SGLT2−/−; P < 0.01). E: AUC calculation is shown for Δ insulin during glucose stimulation. F: Net change in plasma insulin levels from baseline (Δ insulin) during the clamp (n = 6–9 per group). Data were analyzed by Student t test. Significance between curves was determined by one-way ANOVA. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. Data represent the mean ± SEM.
FIG. 4.Pancreatic β-cell mass is increased in db/db-SGLT2−/− mice due to reduced frequency of cell death. A: Insulin secretion from isolated, perifused islets in response to low/high glucose and KCl. B: Glucagon suppression during the same experiment performed in A. C: Relative β-cell volume (islet area/pancreas area) determined from histologic analysis of pancreata. D: Islet number corrected by pancreas area. E: Frequency of β-cell proliferation determined as the number of Ki67/insulin-positive cells per relative islet area. F: Frequency of β-cell death was calculated as the number of TUNEL/insulin-positive cells per relative islet area. G: Representative images of histologic samples used for calculations in C–E. Pancreata stained as follows: panel 1, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain; panel 2, insulin stain; panel 3, Ki-67 stain. Arrow denotes a Ki-67–positive cell; panel 4, TUNEL/insulin costain. Arrow denotes a TUNEL/insulin-positive cell. H&E viewed at original magnification ×40, all others at ×100. n = 3–7 per group. Data were analyzed by Student t test. *P < 0.05. Data represent the mean ± SEM. (A high-quality digital representation of this figure is available in the online issue.)