Literature DB >> 21357451

Imputation of missing single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes using a multivariate mixed model framework.

M P L Calus1, R F Veerkamp, H A Mulder.   

Abstract

The objective of this paper was to investigate, for various scenarios at low and high marker density, the accuracy of imputing genotypes when using a multivariate mixed model framework using information from 2, 4, or 10 surrounding markers. This model predicts genotypes at a locus, using genotypes at nearby loci as correlated traits, and the additive genetic relationship matrix to use information from genotyped relatives. For 2 scenarios this method was compared with the population-based imputation algorithms FastPHASE and Beagle. Accuracies of imputation were obtained with Monte Carlo simulation and predicted with selection index theory, using input from the simulated data. Five different scenarios of missing genotypes were considered: 1) genotypes of some loci are missing due to genotyping errors, 2) juvenile selection candidates are genotyped using a smaller SNP panel, 3) some animals in the pedigree of a breeding population are not genotyped, 4) juvenile selection candidates are not genotyped, and 5) 1 generation of animals in the top of the pedigree are not genotyped. Surrounding marker information did not improve accuracy of imputation when animals whose genotypes were imputed were not genotyped for those surrounding markers. When those animals were genotyped for surrounding markers, results indicated a limited gain when linkage disequilibrium (LD) between SNP was low, but a substantial increase in accuracy when LD between SNP was high. For scenario 1, using 1 vs. 11 SNP, accuracy was respectively 0.75 and 0.81 at low, and 0.75 and 0.93 at high density. For scenario 2, using 1 vs. 11 SNP, accuracy was, respectively, 0.70 and 0.73 at low, and 0.71 and 0.84 at high density. Beagle outperformed the other methods at high SNP density, whereas the multivariate mixed model was clearly superior when SNP density was low and animals where genotyped with a reduced SNP panel. The results showed that extending the univariate gene content method to a multivariate BLUP model with inclusion of surrounding marker information only yields greater imputation accuracy when the animals with imputed loci are at least genotyped for some SNP that are in LD with the SNP to be imputed. The equation derived from selection index theory accurately predicted the accuracy of imputation using the multivariate mixed model framework.
© 2011 American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21357451     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2010-3297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  7 in total

1.  Reducing bias of allele frequency estimates by modeling SNP genotype data with informative missingness.

Authors:  Wan-Yu Lin; Nianjun Liu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 4.599

2.  High-density marker imputation accuracy in sixteen French cattle breeds.

Authors:  Chris Hozé; Marie-Noëlle Fouilloux; Eric Venot; François Guillaume; Romain Dassonneville; Sébastien Fritz; Vincent Ducrocq; Florence Phocas; Didier Boichard; Pascal Croiseau
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 4.297

3.  Effect of genotype imputation on genome-enabled prediction of complex traits: an empirical study with mice data.

Authors:  Vivian P S Felipe; Hayrettin Okut; Daniel Gianola; Martinho A Silva; Guilherme J M Rosa
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 2.797

4.  Novel methods for genotype imputation to whole-genome sequence and a simple linear model to predict imputation accuracy.

Authors:  Steven G Larmer; Mehdi Sargolzaei; Luiz F Brito; Ricardo V Ventura; Flávio S Schenkel
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 2.797

5.  Imputation of high-density genotypes in the Fleckvieh cattle population.

Authors:  Hubert Pausch; Bernhard Aigner; Reiner Emmerling; Christian Edel; Kay-Uwe Götz; Ruedi Fries
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.297

6.  Accuracy of imputation using the most common sires as reference population in layer chickens.

Authors:  Marzieh Heidaritabar; Mario P L Calus; Addie Vereijken; Martien A M Groenen; John W M Bastiaansen
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 2.797

7.  Imputation of non-genotyped individuals based on genotyped relatives: assessing the imputation accuracy of a real case scenario in dairy cattle.

Authors:  Aniek C Bouwman; John M Hickey; Mario P L Calus; Roel F Veerkamp
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 4.297

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.