Literature DB >> 21357439

Stimulus similarity and encoding time influence incidental recognition memory in adult monkeys with selective hippocampal lesions.

Alyson Zeamer1, Martine Meunier, Jocelyne Bachevalier.   

Abstract

Recognition memory impairment after selective hippocampal lesions in monkeys is more profound when measured with visual paired-comparison (VPC) than with delayed nonmatching-to-sample (DNMS). To clarify this issue, we assessed the impact of stimuli similarity and encoding duration on the VPC performance in monkeys with hippocampal lesions and sham-operated controls. The novelty preference was compared for pictures of dissimilar vs. similar objects and for encoding duration of 30, 10, 5, and 1 sec. The novelty preference was spared after hippocampal lesions with dissimilar (colored or black and white [BW]) stimuli and an encoding time ≥10 sec, but declined with similar stimuli or a short encoding time of 1 or 5 sec. Therefore, the severe VPC impairment reported earlier after hippocampal damage cannot be attributed to the long encoding time used (30 sec) relative to DNMS (1-5 sec). However, it may result, at least in part, from the poorer distinctiveness of the stimuli typically used for VPC (BW slides of pictures of equal size and brightness of objects differing in shape) relative to the actual objects used for DNMS, differing in shape, color, size, brightness, and texture. This conclusion fits well with current models that view the hippocampus as a comparator capable of individualizing the representations of highly overlapping inputs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21357439      PMCID: PMC3056513          DOI: 10.1101/lm.2076811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Mem        ISSN: 1072-0502            Impact factor:   2.460


  60 in total

Review 1.  Neural mechanisms for detecting and remembering novel events.

Authors:  Charan Ranganath; Gregor Rainer
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Assessment of locus and extent of neurotoxic lesions in monkeys using neuroimaging techniques: a replication.

Authors:  Sarah Nemanic; Maria C Alvarado; Roger E Price; Edward F Jackson; Jocelyne Bachevalier
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2002-12-15       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: a complementary-learning-systems approach.

Authors:  Kenneth A Norman; Randall C O'Reilly
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Visual paired comparison performance is impaired in a patient with selective hippocampal lesions and relatively intact item recognition.

Authors:  O Pascalis; N M Hunkin; J S Holdstock; C L Isaac; A R Mayes
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Visual presentation of novel objects and new spatial arrangements of objects differentially activates the medial temporal lobe subareas in humans.

Authors:  Maija Pihlajamäki; Heikki Tanila; Mervi Könönen; Tuomo Hänninen; Anne Hämäläinen; Hilkka Soininen; Hannu J Aronen
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  The effect of familiarization time, retention interval, and context change on adults' performance in the visual paired-comparison task.

Authors:  Jenny Richmond; Paula Sowerby; Michael Colombo; Harlene Hayne
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.038

7.  The hippocampal/parahippocampal regions and recognition memory: insights from visual paired comparison versus object-delayed nonmatching in monkeys.

Authors:  Sarah Nemanic; Maria C Alvarado; Jocelyne Bachevalier
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-25       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Perceptual deficits in amnesia: challenging the medial temporal lobe 'mnemonic' view.

Authors:  Andy C H Lee; Tim J Bussey; Elisabeth A Murray; Lisa M Saksida; Russell A Epstein; Narinder Kapur; John R Hodges; Kim S Graham
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Age differences in infants' attention to patterns of different complexities.

Authors:  W M Brennan; E W Ames; R W Moore
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-01-21       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  The effect of age, complexity, and amount of contour on pattern preferences in human infants.

Authors:  B Z Karmel
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1969-04
View more
  10 in total

1.  Effects of selective neonatal hippocampal lesions on tests of object and spatial recognition memory in monkeys.

Authors:  Eric Heuer; Jocelyne Bachevalier
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  The rodent hippocampus is essential for nonspatial object memory.

Authors:  Sarah J Cohen; Alcira H Munchow; Lisa M Rios; Gongliang Zhang; Herborg N Asgeirsdóttir; Robert W Stackman
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Age-associated deficits in pattern separation functions of the perirhinal cortex: a cross-species consensus.

Authors:  Sarah N Burke; Jenelle L Wallace; Andrea L Hartzell; Saman Nematollahi; Kojo Plange; Carol A Barnes
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  A novel AX+/BX- paradigm to assess fear learning and safety-signal processing with repeated-measure designs.

Authors:  Andy M Kazama; Kimberly B Schauder; Michael McKinnon; Jocelyne Bachevalier; Michael Davis
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 5.  Assessing rodent hippocampal involvement in the novel object recognition task. A review.

Authors:  Sarah J Cohen; Robert W Stackman
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Long-term effects of neonatal hippocampal lesions on novelty preference in monkeys.

Authors:  Alyson Zeamer; Jocelyne Bachevalier
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.899

7.  Visual recognition memory is impaired in rhesus monkeys repeatedly exposed to sevoflurane in infancy.

Authors:  M C Alvarado; K L Murphy; M G Baxter
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Intact perceptual ability, but impaired familiarity judgment, after neonatal perirhinal lesions in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Alison R Weiss; Wendi Guo; Rebecca Richardson; Jocelyne Bachevalier
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 6.464

9.  The Discrimination Ratio derived from Novel Object Recognition tasks as a Measure of Recognition Memory Sensitivity, not Bias.

Authors:  Magali H Sivakumaran; Andrew K Mackenzie; Imogen R Callan; James A Ainge; Akira R O'Connor
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Advances in the behavioural testing and network imaging of rodent recognition memory.

Authors:  Lisa Kinnavane; Mathieu M Albasser; John P Aggleton
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.332

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.