Literature DB >> 21356788

DNA Immunoprecipitation (DIP) for the Determination of DNA-Binding Specificity.

Andrea J Gossett1, Jason D Lieb.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTIONKnowledge of the DNA-binding specificity of a transcription factor aids in understanding the function of that factor in the regulation of gene transcription. One popular method of identifying the genomic DNA sites bound by a given protein in vivo is the Chromatin ImmunoPrecipitation with microarray analysis (ChIP-chip) technique. However, this method reveals a binding pattern influenced by in vivo phenomena that may mask the actual DNA-binding specificity of the factor, such as chromatin effects and competitive or cooperative protein-protein interactions. ChIP-chip also requires adequate expression of the protein in the cell type chosen to create the extract used for immunoprecipitation. DNA Immunoprecipitation (DIP) is an alternative technique that allows one to take advantage of the favorable properties of both in vivo and traditional in vitro techniques (e.g., electromobility shift assay [EMSA] and binding site selection [SELEX]). DIP utilizes naked genomic DNA as a binding substrate for one or more purified recombinant proteins. Because genomic DNA is used as a template in DIP reactions, the results are directly comparable to ChIP-chip or ChIP-seq data. DIP can be carried out in the presence of cofactors such as heterodimer partners, competitors, or small molecule binding inhibitors. After DNA is isolated by DIP, it is most efficiently detected using a highly parallel genomic technique such as a DNA microarray (DIP-chip) or high-throughput sequencing (DIP-seq). In this protocol, we describe a DIP of a yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) protein with yeast genomic DNA.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21356788     DOI: 10.1101/pdb.prot4972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CSH Protoc        ISSN: 1559-6095


  6 in total

1.  DNA-affinity-purified chip (DAP-chip) method to determine gene targets for bacterial two component regulatory systems.

Authors:  Lara Rajeev; Eric G Luning; Aindrila Mukhopadhyay
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  PionX sites mark the X chromosome for dosage compensation.

Authors:  Raffaella Villa; Tamas Schauer; Pawel Smialowski; Tobias Straub; Peter B Becker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Factor cooperation for chromosome discrimination in Drosophila.

Authors:  Christian Albig; Evgeniya Tikhonova; Silke Krause; Oksana Maksimenko; Catherine Regnard; Peter B Becker
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  A Feedback Regulatory Loop Containing McdR and WhiB2 Controls Cell Division and DNA Repair in Mycobacteria.

Authors:  Wei Zhou; Shaojia Huang; Bridgette M Cumming; Yong Zhang; Wei Tang; Adrie J C Steyn; Shiyun Chen; Yangbo Hu
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 7.867

Review 5.  Tools to map target genes of bacterial two-component system response regulators.

Authors:  Lara Rajeev; Megan E Garber; Aindrila Mukhopadhyay
Journal:  Environ Microbiol Rep       Date:  2020-04-05       Impact factor: 3.541

6.  Shared nucleotide flanks confer transcriptional competency to bZip core motifs.

Authors:  Daniel M Cohen; Hee-Woong Lim; Kyoung-Jae Won; David J Steger
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 16.971

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.