PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility and preliminary effects of a simultaneous stage-matched exercise and diet (SSED) intervention in breast cancer survivors. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING:Oncology outpatient treatment clinics at the National Cancer Center in South Korea. SAMPLE: 45 women with breast cancer who completed their cancer therapy. METHODS: Participants were assigned to the SSED intervention group (n = 23) or a control group (n = 22). Participants in the SSED group received a 12-week individualized intervention promoting prescribed exercise and a balanced diet through stage-matched telephone counseling and a workbook. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Program feasibility, behavioral outcomes (stage of motivational readiness for exercise and diet, physical activity, and diet quality), and quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes (functioning and global QOL, fatigue, anxiety, and depression). FINDINGS: Participant evaluations of the SSED intervention indicated that it was feasible and acceptable. All women felt that the overall intervention contents were appropriate, and 95% believed that the intervention helped to promote healthy behaviors. Objective data also supported the SSED intervention's feasibility (i.e., 91% completed the trial and 100% of intervention calls were received). When compared to control, the SSED intervention group showed significantly greater improvement in motivational readiness for exercise and diet, emotional functioning, fatigue, and depression. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results suggest that the SSED intervention delivered via telephone counseling and workbook is feasible and beneficial for positive behavioral and QOL outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nurse-led lifestyle interventions may improve QOL for cancer survivors.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility and preliminary effects of a simultaneous stage-matched exercise and diet (SSED) intervention in breast cancer survivors. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Oncology outpatient treatment clinics at the National Cancer Center in South Korea. SAMPLE: 45 women with breast cancer who completed their cancer therapy. METHODS:Participants were assigned to the SSED intervention group (n = 23) or a control group (n = 22). Participants in the SSED group received a 12-week individualized intervention promoting prescribed exercise and a balanced diet through stage-matched telephone counseling and a workbook. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Program feasibility, behavioral outcomes (stage of motivational readiness for exercise and diet, physical activity, and diet quality), and quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes (functioning and global QOL, fatigue, anxiety, and depression). FINDINGS:Participant evaluations of the SSED intervention indicated that it was feasible and acceptable. All women felt that the overall intervention contents were appropriate, and 95% believed that the intervention helped to promote healthy behaviors. Objective data also supported the SSED intervention's feasibility (i.e., 91% completed the trial and 100% of intervention calls were received). When compared to control, the SSED intervention group showed significantly greater improvement in motivational readiness for exercise and diet, emotional functioning, fatigue, and depression. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results suggest that the SSED intervention delivered via telephone counseling and workbook is feasible and beneficial for positive behavioral and QOL outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nurse-led lifestyle interventions may improve QOL for cancer survivors.
Authors: Ana D Goode; Sheleigh P Lawler; Charlotte L Brakenridge; Marina M Reeves; Elizabeth G Eakin Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2015-03-11 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Maria C Swartz; Zakkoyya H Lewis; Elizabeth J Lyons; Kristofer Jennings; Addie Middleton; Rachel R Deer; Demi Arnold; Kaitlin Dresser; Kenneth J Ottenbacher; James S Goodwin Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2017-04-17 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: V D'Egidio; C Sestili; M Mancino; I Sciarra; R Cocchiara; I Backhaus; A Mannocci; Alessandro De Luca; Federico Frusone; Massimo Monti; G La Torre Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2017-06-16 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Amy M Berkman; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Kim Dittus; Vicki Hart; Christine M Vatovec; John G King; Ted A James; Susan G Lakoski; Brian L Sprague Journal: Prev Med Date: 2015-04-06 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Ashlea Braun; James Portner; Elizabeth M Grainger; Emily B Hill; Gregory S Young; Steven K Clinton; Colleen K Spees Journal: J Nutr Educ Behav Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 3.045
Authors: Shiraz I Mishra; Roberta W Scherer; Paula M Geigle; Debra R Berlanstein; Ozlem Topaloglu; Carolyn C Gotay; Claire Snyder Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2012-08-15
Authors: Shirley M Bluethmann; Sally W Vernon; Kelley Pettee Gabriel; Caitlin C Murphy; L Kay Bartholomew Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2015-01-03 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Carolina Fernández-Lao; Irene Cantarero-Villanueva; Angelica Ariza-Garcia; Carol Courtney; César Fernández-de-las-Peñas; Manuel Arroyo-Morales Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2012-08-04 Impact factor: 3.603