Literature DB >> 21356223

Hemispheric differences in spatial relation processing in a scene perception task: a neuropsychological study.

Ineke J M van der Ham1, Martine J E van Zandvoort2, Catharina J M Frijns3, L Jaap Kappelle3, Albert Postma2.   

Abstract

Understanding a complex visual scene depends strongly on our ability to process the spatial relations between objects in that scene. Two classes of spatial relations can be distinguished. Categorical information concerns more abstract relations, like "left of", while coordinate information is metric and more precise, such as "2cm apart". For categorical processing a left hemisphere advantage is typically found, and coordinate processing is linked to a right hemisphere advantage. However, this has scarcely been investigated in more naturalistic settings. The aim of the present study was to explore spatial relation coding in natural scenes as well as to gain more insight in hemispheric differences in processing categorical and coordinate position changes, by testing patients with unilateral stroke. By means of a comparative visual search task using images of rooms, a healthy control group (N=28), patients with left hemisphere stroke (LH) (N=16), and patients with right hemisphere stroke (RH) (N=17) were tested on their ability to detect position changes that were either only coordinately different (coo), or both coordinately and categorically different (coo+cat). The response pattern of the control subjects confirmed previous findings that both coordinate and categorical information contributed to position change detection. Compared to the control group, the RH patient group showed an impairment on both coo and coo+cat position changes. In contrast, the LH patient group was not impaired on the coo condition and showed only a trend of impairment on the coo+cat condition. These response patterns suggest that lateralisation patterns found in previous, more simple and controlled experiments are also present to some degree in a more complex and lifelike setting.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21356223     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  5 in total

1.  Frames of reference and categorical and coordinate spatial relations: a hierarchical organisation.

Authors:  Francesco Ruotolo; Tina Iachini; Albert Postma; Ineke J M van der Ham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Quantifying the variability of scene-selective regions: Interindividual, interhemispheric, and sex differences.

Authors:  Zonglei Zhen; Xiang-Zhen Kong; Lijie Huang; Zetian Yang; Xu Wang; Xin Hao; Taicheng Huang; Yiying Song; Jia Liu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Sex differences in the weighting of metric and categorical information in spatial location memory.

Authors:  Mark P Holden; Sarah J Duff-Canning; Elizabeth Hampson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-01-17

4.  Patients with schizophrenia do not preserve automatic grouping when mentally re-grouping figures: shedding light on an ignored difficulty.

Authors:  Anne Giersch; Mitsouko van Assche; Rémi L Capa; Corinne Marrer; Daniel Gounot
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-17

Review 5.  Dissociable roles of the hippocampus and parietal cortex in processing of coordinate and categorical spatial information.

Authors:  Oliver Baumann; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.