Literature DB >> 21356222

Age-related changes in the attentional control of visual cortex: a selective problem in the left visual hemifield.

Lindsay S Nagamatsu1, Patrick Carolan, Teresa Y L Liu-Ambrose, Todd C Handy.   

Abstract

To what extent does our visual-spatial attention change with age? In this regard, it has been previously reported that relative to young controls, seniors show delays in attention-related sensory facilitation. Given this finding, our study was designed to examine two key questions regarding age-related changes in the effect of spatial attention on sensory-evoked responses in visual cortex--are there visual field differences in the age-related impairments in sensory processing, and do these impairments co-occur with changes in the executive control signals associated with visual spatial orienting? Therefore, our study examined both attentional control and attentional facilitation in seniors (aged 66-74 years) and young adults (aged 18-25 years) using a canonical spatial orienting task. Participants responded to attended and unattended peripheral targets while we recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) to both targets and attention-directing spatial cues. We found that not only were sensory-evoked responses delayed in seniors specifically for unattended events in the left visual field as measured via latency shifts in the lateral occipital P1 elicited by visual targets, but seniors also showed amplitude reductions in the anterior directing attentional negativity (ADAN) component elicited by cues directing attention to the left visual field. At the same time, seniors also had significantly higher error rates for targets presented in the left vs. right visual field. Taken together, our data thus converge on the conclusion that age-related changes in visual spatial attention involve both sensory-level and executive attentional control processes, and that these effects appear to be strongly associated with the left visual field.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21356222      PMCID: PMC3514549          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  39 in total

1.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control.

Authors:  J B Hopfinger; M H Buonocore; G R Mangun
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Effects of aging on visuospatial attention: an ERP study.

Authors:  T Curran; A Hills; M B Patterson; M E Strauss
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 3.  The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.026

Review 4.  Top-down modulation and normal aging.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Monitoring the visual world: hemispheric asymmetries and subcortical processes in attention.

Authors:  G R Mangun; S J Luck; R Plager; W Loftus; S A Hillyard; T Handy; V P Clark; M S Gazzaniga
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Aging and Individual Variation in Interhemispheric Collaboration and Hemispheric Asymmetry.

Authors:  Barbara J Cherry; Maheen Adamson; Alisa Duclos; Joseph B Hellige
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2005-12

7.  Effects of aging on voluntary and involuntary shifts of attention.

Authors:  Amy E Lincourt; Charles L Folk; William J Hoyer
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  1997-12

8.  Age differences in the contingent negative variation (CNV): reduced frontal activity in the elderly.

Authors:  H J Michalewski; L W Thompson; D B Smith; J V Patterson; T E Bowman; D Litzelman; G Brent
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1980-07

9.  Differential processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in young and older healthy adults: implications for pathology.

Authors:  Silke Lux; John C Marshall; Markus Thimm; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Do ERP components triggered during attentional orienting represent supramodal attentional control?

Authors:  Ellen Seiss; Elena Gherri; Alison F Eardley; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  7 in total

1.  The impact of visual acuity on age-related differences in neural markers of early visual processing.

Authors:  Kirk R Daffner; Anna E Haring; Brittany R Alperin; Tatyana Y Zhuravleva; Katherine K Mott; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Deficits in audiovisual speech perception in normal aging emerge at the level of whole-word recognition.

Authors:  Ryan A Stevenson; Caitlin E Nelms; Sarah H Baum; Lilia Zurkovsky; Morgan D Barense; Paul A Newhouse; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.673

3.  Effects of age and cardiovascular disease on selective attention.

Authors:  Sylvie Chokron; Gérard Helft; Céline Perez
Journal:  Cardiovasc Psychiatry Neurol       Date:  2013-12-25

4.  A rightward shift in the visuospatial attention vector with healthy aging.

Authors:  Christopher S Y Benwell; Gregor Thut; Ashley Grant; Monika Harvey
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 5.  Attentional Orienting and Dorsal Visual Stream Decline: Review of Behavioral and EEG Studies.

Authors:  Evatte T Sciberras-Lim; Anthony J Lambert
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 6.  A Meta-Analysis of Line Bisection and Landmark Task Performance in Older Adults.

Authors:  Gemma Learmonth; Marietta Papadatou-Pastou
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 6.940

7.  Right-lateralised lane keeping in young and older British drivers.

Authors:  Gemma Learmonth; Gesine Märker; Natasha McBride; Pernilla Pellinen; Monika Harvey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.