Literature DB >> 21355952

The post-operative pathological prognostic parameters of clear cell renal cell carcinoma in pT1a cases.

Toshinori Nishikimi1, Toyonori Tsuzuki, Takashi Fujita, Naoto Sassa, Akitoshi Fukatsu, Satoru Katsuno, Yasushi Yoshino, Ryohei Hattori, Momokazu Gotoh.   

Abstract

There has been a recent increase in the number of small clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) cases, particularly in pT1a cases. The prognostic parameters for small ccRCC, however, are not well described. Herein, we assess the pathological parameters of pT1a patients. Various clinicopathological parameters were analyzed in 293 patients with pT1a ccRCC without pre-operative metastasis to predict the disease-free survival rate (DFS) and the cancer-specific survival rate (CSS). Clinicopathological parameters included age, tumor location, Fuhrman grade, lymph-vascular invasion (LVI), tumor necrosis, and growth pattern (expansive or infiltrative). In the univariate analysis, Fuhrman grade (grade 1 + 2 vs. 3 + 4), LVI, growth pattern, and tumor necrosis were parameters associated with a worse prognosis (P < 0.0001) in both the DFS and CSS. In the multivariate analysis, Fuhrman grade (P = 0.0048), growth pattern (P = 0.0275), and tumor necrosis (P = 0.0188) were statistically significant in the DFS. Fuhrman grade (P = 0.0189) and growth pattern (P = 0.0016) were also statistically significant in the CSS. Fuhrman grade, tumor necrosis, and growth pattern were independent prognostic parameters in pT1a ccRCC. Growth pattern, a previously unrecognized parameter for prognosis, can be considered a new prognostic parameter in ccRCC.
© 2011 The Authors. Pathology International © 2011 Japanese Society of Pathology and Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21355952     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2010.02633.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathol Int        ISSN: 1320-5463            Impact factor:   2.534


  5 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation and management of small renal masses: looking beyond the tumor margin.

Authors:  Michael Garcia-Roig; Michael A Gorin; Merce Jorda
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Characteristics of aggressive variants in T1a renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Tatsuya Takayama; Takayuki Sugiyama; Fumitake Kai; Takahisa Suzuki; Masahiro Nagata; Takeshi Imanishi; Takuji Mizuno; Shigenori Sato; Hiroshi Furuse; Soichi Mugiya; Seiichiro Ozono
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Tumor grade of clear cell renal cell carcinoma assessed by contrast-enhanced computed tomography.

Authors:  Kousei Ishigami; Leandro V Leite; Marius G Pakalniskis; Daniel K Lee; Danniele G Holanda; David M Kuehn
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-11-26

4.  Tumor necrosis is a strong predictor for recurrence in patients with pathological T1a renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Keiichi Ito; Kenji Seguchi; Hideyuki Shimazaki; Eiji Takahashi; Shinsuke Tasaki; Kenji Kuroda; Akinori Sato; Junichi Asakuma; Akio Horiguchi; Tomohiko Asano
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Prognostic value of programmed death-ligand 1 status in Japanese patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Motohide Uemura; Noboru Nakaigawa; Naoto Sassa; Katsunori Tatsugami; Kenichi Harada; Toshinari Yamasaki; Nobuaki Matsubara; Takuya Yoshimoto; Yuki Nakagawa; Tamaki Fukuyama; Mototsugu Oya; Nobuo Shinohara; Hirotsugu Uemura; Toyonori Tsuzuki
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.402

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.