Literature DB >> 21355698

Undergraduate ophthalmology education - A survey of UK medical schools.

Oliver Baylis1, Philip I Murray, Margaret Dayan.   

Abstract

Changes in the UK undergraduate medical curriculum mean that a clinical placement in ophthalmology is no longer a requirement. An ophthalmic assessment is necessary for a full physical examination and failure to elicit and interpret signs could mean missing sight and life-threatening pathology. This study was to investigate current undergraduate ophthalmology teaching. An email questionnaire, about the content and delivery of the ophthalmology teaching, was sent to each UK medical school in 2007/2008. The response rate was 83%. Nineteen (79%) medical schools had a compulsory attachment to the ophthalmology department with an average length of 7.6 days (range 3.5-15 days). There was variation as to how ophthalmology was included in the curriculum. Teaching methods and standards also varied. Finally, assessments ranged from formal written and practical exams in some medical schools to informal or non-existent ones in others. The most striking finding was the variation in ophthalmology education a student may receive, with some students receiving none. It is necessary to improve the profile of ophthalmology and ensure that all students achieve a minimum basic standard.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21355698     DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.540594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  15 in total

1.  Direct ophthalmoscopy should be taught to undergraduate medical students--No.

Authors:  R M J Purbrick; N V Chong
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Direct ophthalmoscopy should be taught to undergraduate medical students-yes.

Authors:  I H Yusuf; J F Salmon; C K Patel
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Evaluation of eLearning for the teaching of undergraduate ophthalmology at medical school: a randomised controlled crossover study.

Authors:  Caroline A Petrarca; Julia Warner; Andrew Simpson; Robert Petrarca; Abdel Douiri; David Byrne; Timothy L Jackson
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Smart phone ophthalmoscopy: a potential replacement for the direct ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  Sunil Mamtora; Maria Teresa Sandinha; Amritha Ajith; Anna Song; David H W Steel
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  How can undergraduate ophthalmology teaching be improved?

Authors:  Elliott Yann Ah-Kee; Aamir Asif Khan
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2015-06-25

6.  Red eyes and red-flags: improving ophthalmic assessment and referral in primary care.

Authors:  Caroline Kilduff; Charis Lois
Journal:  BMJ Qual Improv Rep       Date:  2016-06-29

7.  Teaching Ophthalmology for Machines.

Authors:  Thiago Gonçalves Dos Santos Martins; Maria Carolina Francisco Kuba; Thomaz Gonçalves Dos Santos Martins
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2018-06-29

8.  The Accuracy of GP Referrals into Manchester Royal Eye Hospital Orthoptic Department.

Authors:  Martha Waters; Rachel Clarke; Laura England; Anna O'Connor
Journal:  Br Ir Orthopt J       Date:  2021-06-10

9.  Direct ophthalmoscopy on YouTube: analysis of instructional YouTube videos' content and approach to visualization.

Authors:  Nanna Jo Borgersen; Mikael Johannes Vuokko Henriksen; Lars Konge; Torben Lykke Sørensen; Ann Sofia Skou Thomsen; Yousif Subhi
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-16

10.  Present and future of the undergraduate ophthalmology curriculum: a survey of UK medical schools.

Authors:  Sophie Hill; Reg Dennick; Winfried Amoaku
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2017-11-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.