Literature DB >> 21355433

The strengths and limitations of empirical bioethics.

K A Strong1, W Lipworth, I Kerridge.   

Abstract

The past two decades have been witness to an "empirical turn" in bioethics. Whereas once this field of study concerned itself purely with theoretical analysis of ethical issues emerging in the design and delivery of health care, increasingly bioethics has embraced a range of empirical research methods from the social sciences and humanities. The emergence of "empirical bioethics" has, however, been the subject of enormous debate, both in regard to its methods and its purpose. For the most part these criticisms fail to appreciate the assumptions that underpin empirical bioethics or misrepresent the claims that are made about its moral utility. This article provides a brief account of the assumptions, strengths and limitations of empirical bioethics.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21355433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Law Med        ISSN: 1320-159X


  2 in total

1.  How should we deal with misattributed paternity? A survey of lay public attitudes.

Authors:  Georgia Lowe; Jonathan Pugh; Guy Kahane; Louise Corben; Sharon Lewis; Martin Delatycki; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2017-09-29

2.  Impact of legislation and public funding on oncofertility: a survey of Canadian, French and Moroccan pediatric hematologists/oncologists.

Authors:  Aliya Oulaya Affdal; Michael Grynberg; Laila Hessissen; Vardit Ravitsky
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.652

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.