Literature DB >> 21354708

Blood loss during extensive escharectomy and auto-microskin grafting in adult male major burn patients.

Gaoxing Luo1, Hua Fan, Wei Sun, Yizhi Peng, Lang Chen, Junsheng Tao, Jun Li, Sisi Yang, Xianchang Li, Mark Fitzgerald, Jun Wu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To improve the accuracy of blood loss estimation during extensive escharectomy and auto-microskin grafting on extremities in adult male major burn patients.
METHOD: All adult male major burn patients admitted to our center who underwent extensive escharectomy and auto-microskin graft on extremities for more than 10% TBSA during the period 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2009 were involved in this study. The blood loss during the operation was estimated by the surgeons or calculated according to the changes in hemoglobin levels.
RESULTS: The average burn and escharectomy areas for the 64 burn patients included in the study were 74.16 ± 16.96% and 30.27 ± 15.63% TBSA respectively. The auto-microskin donor area was 3.81% TBSA. The volumes of intra-operative calculated and estimated blood losses and transfused blood during the operation were 0.47 ml/cm2, 0.13 ml/cm2 and 0.20 ml/cm2 surgical area 77.29 ml, 20.51 ml and 32.83 ml per 1% TBSA), respectively. Within two weeks after injury surgical blood loss appeared to be greater the later the operation was carried out. Within the first week after injury the mean proportional blood loss was increased with area excised.
CONCLUSION: In this study the average calculated blood loss for the operation of extensive escharectomy and microskin graft in adult male major burn patient was 0.47 ml/cm2 (77.29 ml per 1% TBSA). This result will help us to predict expected blood loss more accurately.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21354708     DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2011.01.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Burns        ISSN: 0305-4179            Impact factor:   2.744


  6 in total

1.  Enzymatic escharolysis with nexobrid® on partial thickness burn wounds: pre- and post-debridement histological assessment.

Authors:  A Di Lonardo; V Nardini; M De Rosa; C Pascone; A Graziano; A M Criscuoli; S Ciappi
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2018-03-31

2.  Selective Enzymatic Debridement For The Management Of Acute Upper Limb Burns.

Authors:  M Cherubino; L Valdatta; T Baroni; I Pellegatta; F Tamborini; L Garutti; P Di Summa; R Adani
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2021-12-31

Review 3.  The progress of Chinese burn medicine from the Third Military Medical University-in memory of its pioneer, Professor Li Ao.

Authors:  Haisheng Li; Junyi Zhou; Yizhi Peng; Jiaping Zhang; Xi Peng; Qizhi Luo; Zhiqiang Yuan; Hong Yan; Daizhi Peng; Weifeng He; Fengjun Wang; Guangping Liang; Yuesheng Huang; Jun Wu; Gaoxing Luo
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2017-05-30

4.  Early application of continuous high-volume haemofiltration can reduce sepsis and improve the prognosis of patients with severe burns.

Authors:  Bo You; Yu Long Zhang; Gao Xing Luo; Yong Ming Dang; Bei Jiang; Guang Tao Huang; Xin Zhu Liu; Zi Chen Yang; Yu Chen; Jing Chen; Zhi Qiang Yuan; Su Peng Yin; Yi Zhi Peng
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Cost-Effectiveness of the Use of Autologous Cell Harvesting Device Compared to Standard of Care for Treatment of Severe Burns in the United States.

Authors:  Stacey Kowal; Eliza Kruger; Pinar Bilir; James H Holmes; William Hickerson; Kevin Foster; Scott Nystrom; Jeremiah Sparks; Narayan Iyer; Katie Bush; Andrew Quick
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.845

6.  Generation and validation of a formula to calculate hemoglobin loss on a cohort of healthy adults subjected to controlled blood loss.

Authors:  Max Hahn-Klimroth; Philipp Loick; Soo-Zin Kim-Wanner; Erhard Seifried; Halvard Bonig
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 5.531

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.