Literature DB >> 21354684

Sex differences in dichotic listening.

Daniel Voyer1.   

Abstract

The present study quantified the magnitude of sex differences in perceptual asymmetries as measured with dichotic listening. This was achieved by means of a meta-analysis of the literature dating back from the initial use of dichotic listening as a measure of laterality. The meta-analysis included 249 effect sizes pertaining to sex differences and 246 effect sizes for the main effect of laterality. The results showed small and homogeneous sex differences in laterality in favor of men (d=0.054). The main effect of laterality was of medium magnitude (d=0.609) but it was heterogeneous. Homogeneity for the main effect of laterality was achieved through partitioning as a function of task, demonstrating larger asymmetries for verbal (d=0.65) than for non-verbal tasks (d=0.45). The results are discussed with reference to top-down and bottom-up factors in dichotic listening. The possible influence of a publication bias is also discussed. 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21354684     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  10 in total

1.  Brain laterality, depression and anxiety disorders: New findings for emotional and verbal dichotic listening in individuals at risk for depression.

Authors:  Gerard E Bruder; Jorge Alvarenga; Karen Abraham; Jamie Skipper; Virginia Warner; Daniel Voyer; Bradley S Peterson; Myrna M Weissman
Journal:  Laterality       Date:  2015-11-19

2.  Effects of Auditory Attention Training with the Dichotic Listening Task: Behavioural and Neurophysiological Evidence.

Authors:  Jussi Tallus; Anna Soveri; Heikki Hämäläinen; Jyrki Tuomainen; Matti Laine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Laterality across languages: Results from a global dichotic listening study using a smartphone application.

Authors:  Josef J Bless; René Westerhausen; Janne von Koss Torkildsen; Magne Gudmundsen; Kristiina Kompus; Kenneth Hugdahl
Journal:  Laterality       Date:  2015-01-14

4.  Left ear advantage in speech-related dichotic listening is not specific to auditory processing disorder in children: A machine-learning fMRI and DTI study.

Authors:  Vincent J Schmithorst; Rola Farah; Robert W Keith
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 4.881

5.  The right way to kiss: directionality bias in head-turning during kissing.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Michael J Proulx; Alexandra A de Sousa; Chhanda Karmaker; Arifa Rahman; Fahria Karim; Naima Nigar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Auditory Evoked Potential Mismatch Negativity in Normal-Hearing Adults.

Authors:  Laura Flach Schwade; Dayane Domeneghini Didoné; Pricila Sleifer
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-02

7.  Task-domain and hemisphere-asymmetry effects in cisgender and transmale individuals.

Authors:  E Darcy Burgund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  "Right on all Occasions?" - On the Feasibility of Laterality Research Using a Smartphone Dichotic Listening Application.

Authors:  Josef J Bless; René Westerhausen; Joanne Arciuli; Kristiina Kompus; Magne Gudmundsen; Kenneth Hugdahl
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-07

9.  A large-scale estimate on the relationship between language and motor lateralization.

Authors:  Julian Packheiser; Judith Schmitz; Larissa Arning; Christian Beste; Onur Güntürkün; Sebastian Ocklenburg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Lateralized Affective Word Priming and Gender Effect.

Authors:  Ensie Abbassi; Isabelle Blanchette; Bess Sirmon-Taylor; Ana Inès Ansaldo; Bernadette Ska; Yves Joanette
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-01-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.