Literature DB >> 21354651

Outcomes of emergency department patients presenting with adverse drug events.

Corinne M Hohl1, Bohdan Nosyk, Lisa Kuramoto, Peter J Zed, Jeffrey R Brubacher, Riyad B Abu-Laban, Samuel B Sheps, Boris Sobolev.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Our objectives are to describe the outcomes of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) because of an adverse drug event and to compare them with outcomes of patients presenting for other reasons.
METHODS: This prospective observational study was conducted at Vancouver General Hospital, a 955-bed tertiary care hospital. We prospectively enrolled adults presenting to the ED between March and June 2006, using a systematic sampling algorithm. Pharmacists and physicians independently evaluated patients for adverse drug events. An independent committee reviewed and adjudicated cases in which assessments were discordant or uncertain. Data from the index visit were linked to vital statistics, administrative health services utilization, and cost of care data.
RESULTS: Of 1,000 patients, 122 (12.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 10.3% to 14.4%) presented to the ED because of an adverse drug event. Of these, 48 presented because of an adverse drug reaction (one type of adverse drug event defined as an unintended response that occurred despite use of an appropriate drug dosage). We found no difference in mortality among patients presenting with and without adverse drug reactions (14.6% versus 5.9%; hazard ratio 1.57; 95% CI 0.70 to 3.52). After adjustment, patients with adverse drug events had a higher risk of spending additional days in the hospital per month (6.3% versus 3.4%; odds ratio 1.52; 95% CI 1.43 to 1.62) and higher rate of outpatient health care encounters (1.73 versus 1.22; rate ratio 1.20; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.40). The adjusted median monthly cost of care was 1.90 times higher (Can $325 versus $96; 95% CI 1.18 to 3.08).
CONCLUSION: ED patients presenting with an adverse drug event incurred greater health services utilization and costs during a 6-month follow-up period compared with patients presenting for other reasons.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21354651     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  39 in total

1.  Drug-drug interaction through molecular structure similarity analysis.

Authors:  Santiago Vilar; Rave Harpaz; Eugenio Uriarte; Lourdes Santana; Raul Rabadan; Carol Friedman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Medication Reconciliation Practices in Canadian Emergency Departments: A National Survey.

Authors:  Richard Wanbon; Catherine Lyder; Eric Villeneuve; Stephen Shalansky; Leslie Manuel; Melanie Harding
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2015 May-Jun

3.  Key pharmacy indicators: Capturing workload and measuring operational performance in a Canadian Forces clinic.

Authors:  Joseph Dagenais; Sylvain Grenier
Journal:  Can Pharm J (Ott)       Date:  2013-03

4.  Application of the Pareto principle to identify and address drug-therapy safety issues.

Authors:  Fabian Müller; Harald Dormann; Barbara Pfistermeister; Anja Sonst; Andrius Patapovas; Renate Vogler; Nina Hartmann; Bettina Plank-Kiegele; Melanie Kirchner; Thomas Bürkle; Renke Maas
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  The effect of pharmacist-led medication review in high-risk patients in the emergency department: an evaluation protocol.

Authors:  Corinne M Hohl; Kimberlyn McGrail; Boris Sobolev
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-01-13

6.  Clinical Pharmacy Services in Canadian Emergency Departments: A National Survey.

Authors:  Richard Wanbon; Catherine Lyder; Eric Villeneuve; Stephen Shalansky; Leslie Manuel; Melanie Harding
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2015 May-Jun

7.  Pharmacy in the 21st century: Enhancing the impact of the profession of pharmacy on people's lives in the context of health care trends, evidence and policies.

Authors:  Lisa Dolovich; Zubin Austin; Nancy Waite; Feng Chang; Barbara Farrell; Kelly Grindrod; Sherilyn Houle; Lisa McCarthy; Lori MacCallum; Beth Sproule
Journal:  Can Pharm J (Ott)       Date:  2018-12-25

Review 8.  The effect of early in-hospital medication review on health outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Corinne M Hohl; Maeve E Wickham; Boris Sobolev; Jeff J Perry; Marco L A Sivilotti; Scott Garrison; Eddy Lang; Penny Brasher; Mary M Doyle-Waters; Baljeet Brar; Brian H Rowe; Joel Lexchin; Richard Holland
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Performance of trigger tools in identifying adverse drug events in emergency department patients: a validation study.

Authors:  Andrei Karpov; Catherine Parcero; Catherine P Y Mok; Chandima Panditha; Eugenia Yu; Linda Dempster; Corinne M Hohl
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 10.  The effect of community pharmacy-based interventions on patient health outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Susan J Blalock; Andrew W Roberts; Julie C Lauffenburger; Trey Thompson; Shanna K O'Connor
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 3.929

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.