Literature DB >> 21354384

Translation into Arabic and validation of the ASES index in assessment of shoulder disabilities.

A Yahia1, M Guermazi, M Khmekhem, S Ghroubi, K Ayedi, M H Elleuch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To translate into Arabic and validate the "American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Evaluation Form" (ASES) for use in a Tunisian population presenting with periarticular pathologies of the shoulder.
BACKGROUND: No functional index assessing the functional capacities of the shoulder is presently available in Arabic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The translation was achieved by means of forward/backward translation. Adaptations were carried out subsequent to a preliminary test involving 15 persons. Patients with periarticular shoulder disabilities were included. Clinical measurements evaluated pain and functional disability by means of the visual analogue scale (VAS). Interrater concordance (repeatability) was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland and Altman method. Construct validity (convergent and discriminant validity) was investigated using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient and a factorial analysis followed by orthogonal rotation. The internal consistency of each factor was graded in terms of the Cronbach alpha coefficient.
RESULTS: Eighty (80) patients were included in the study. Interrater concordance was excellent (ICC=0.96). The Bland and Altman method showed a low-variability mean difference. Correlations of the index score with the pain VAS (r=-0.49) and functional disability (r=-0.58) suggested satisfactory convergent validity, and our index likewise showed good discriminant validity. Factorial analysis led to the extraction of two factors with a cumulative variance rate of 92.6% that could not be explained.
CONCLUSION: Translated into Arabic, the ASES index was found to possess high metrological qualities. While the index has been satisfactorily validated with regard to a Tunisian population, additional studies are needed to verify its applicability to other Arab populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21354384     DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2010.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Phys Rehabil Med        ISSN: 1877-0657


  10 in total

1.  Translation, cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Turkish ASES questionnaire.

Authors:  Derya Celik; Ata Can Atalar; Mehmet Demirhan; Ahmet Dirican
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Spanish cultural adaptation and validation of the shoulder pain and disability index, and the oxford shoulder score after breast cancer surgery.

Authors:  María Torres-Lacomba; Beatriz Sánchez-Sánchez; Virginia Prieto-Gómez; Soraya Pacheco-da-Costa; María José Yuste-Sánchez; Beatriz Navarro-Brazález; Carlos Gutiérrez-Ortega
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 3.186

3.  Reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section.

Authors:  Kirsi Piitulainen; Juha Paloneva; Jari Ylinen; Hannu Kautiainen; Arja Häkkinen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Validation of a Mobile Version of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form: An Observational Randomized Crossover Trial.

Authors:  Jingyi Hou; Qingyue Li; Menglei Yu; Fangqi Li; Yiyong Tang; Yi Long; Yamuhanmode Alike; Yuanhao Zhang; Maslah Idiris Ali; Congda Zhang; Weiping Li; Rui Yang
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.773

5.  The Dutch version of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form is a reliable and valid questionnaire for shoulder problems.

Authors:  Quinten T M Felsch; Peter Sievert; Martijn G M Schotanus; Edwin J P Jansen
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2019-09-16

6.  The Chinese version of the American shoulder and elbow surgeons standardized shoulder assessment form questionnaire, patient self-report section: a cross-cultural adaptation and validation study.

Authors:  Tung-Hee Albert Tie; Chih-Kai Hong; Illich Chua; Fa-Chuan Kuan; Wei-Ren Su; Kai-Lan Hsu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 7.  How to Assess Shoulder Functionality: A Systematic Review of Existing Validated Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Rocio Aldon-Villegas; Carmen Ridao-Fernández; Dolores Torres-Enamorado; Gema Chamorro-Moriana
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-08

8.  Validity and reliability of the Greek version of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form.

Authors:  Konstantinos E Tolis; Antonis A Galanos; Emmanouil M Fandridis; Konstantinos C Soultanis; Ioannis K Triantafyllopoulos
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-01-17

9.  Patient self-report section of the ASES questionnaire: a Spanish validation study using classical test theory and the Rasch model.

Authors:  Kalliopi Vrotsou; Ricardo Cuéllar; Félix Silió; Miguel Ángel Rodriguez; Daniel Garay; Gorka Busto; Ziortza Trancho; Antonio Escobar
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Translation and validation of the Intermittent Catheterisation Difficulty Questionnaire (ICDQ) in an Arabic population.

Authors:  Sameh Ghroubi; Jihène Chmak; Ons Borgi; Nedra El Fani; Soumaya El Arem; Mohamed Habib Elleuch
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2019-12-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.