Literature DB >> 21354285

Relations between perceptual measures of temporal processing, auditory-evoked brainstem responses and speech intelligibility in noise.

Alexandra Papakonstantinou1, Olaf Strelcyk, Torsten Dau.   

Abstract

This study investigates behavioural and objective measures of temporal auditory processing and their relation to the ability to understand speech in noise. The experiments were carried out on a homogeneous group of seven hearing-impaired listeners with normal sensitivity at low frequencies (up to 1 kHz) and steeply sloping hearing losses above 1 kHz. For comparison, data were also collected for five normal-hearing listeners. Temporal processing was addressed at low frequencies by means of psychoacoustical frequency discrimination, binaural masked detection and amplitude modulation (AM) detection. In addition, auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to clicks and broadband rising chirps were recorded. Furthermore, speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were determined for Danish sentences in speech-shaped noise. The main findings were: (1) SRTs were neither correlated with hearing sensitivity as reflected in the audiogram nor with the AM detection thresholds which represent an envelope-based measure of temporal resolution; (2) SRTs were correlated with frequency discrimination and binaural masked detection which are associated with temporal fine-structure coding; (3) The wave-V thresholds for the chirp-evoked ABRs indicated a relation to SRTs and the ability to process temporal fine structure. Overall, the results demonstrate the importance of low-frequency temporal processing for speech reception which can be affected even if pure-tone sensitivity is close to normal.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21354285     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  10 in total

1.  Reliability of Measures Intended to Assess Threshold-Independent Hearing Disorders.

Authors:  Aryn M Kamerer; Judy G Kopun; Sara E Fultz; Stephen T Neely; Daniel M Rasetshwane
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Effects of hearing loss on the subcortical representation of speech cues.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Travis White-Schwoch; Sarah Drehobl; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Abnormal intelligibility of speech in competing speech and in noise in a frequency region where audiometric thresholds are near-normal for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Agnès C Léger; David T Ives; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  Is the din really harmless? Long-term effects of non-traumatic noise on the adult auditory system.

Authors:  Boris Gourévitch; Jean-Marc Edeline; Florian Occelli; Jos J Eggermont
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Audiomotor Perceptual Training Enhances Speech Intelligibility in Background Noise.

Authors:  Jonathon P Whitton; Kenneth E Hancock; Jeffrey M Shannon; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Relationship between sensitivity to temporal fine structure and spoken language abilities in children with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Laurianne Cabrera; Lorna F Halliday
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.482

7.  Temporal Fine-Structure Coding and Lateralized Speech Perception in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.

Authors:  Gusztáv Lőcsei; Julie H Pedersen; Søren Laugesen; Sébastien Santurette; Torsten Dau; Ewen N MacDonald
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  A Comparison of Behavioral Methods for Indexing the Auditory Processing of Temporal Fine Structure Cues.

Authors:  Eric C Hoover; Brianna N Kinney; Karen L Bell; Frederick J Gallun; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in Response to Frequency Changes with Varied Magnitude, Rate, and Direction.

Authors:  Bernard M D Vonck; Marc J W Lammers; Marjolijn van der Waals; Gijsbert A van Zanten; Huib Versnel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-06-05

10.  Robust Data-Driven Auditory Profiling Towards Precision Audiology.

Authors:  Raul Sanchez-Lopez; Michal Fereczkowski; Tobias Neher; Sébastien Santurette; Torsten Dau
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.