| Literature DB >> 21354174 |
Manuel Mayr1, Dalit May, Oren Gordon, Basetti Madhu, Dan Gilon, Xiaoke Yin, Qiuru Xing, Ignat Drozdov, Chrysanthi Ainali, Sophia Tsoka, Qingbo Xu, John Griffiths, Anton Horrevoets, Eli Keshet.
Abstract
A transgenic mouse model for conditional induction of long-term hibernation via myocardium-specific expression of a VEGF-sequestering soluble receptor allowed the dissection of the hibernation process into an initiation and a maintenance phase. The hypoxic initiation phase was characterized by peak levels of K(ATP) channel and glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) expression. Glibenclamide, an inhibitor of K(ATP) channels, blocked GLUT1 induction. In the maintenance phase, tissue hypoxia and GLUT1 expression were reduced. Thus, we employed a combined "-omics" approach to resolve this cardioprotective adaptation process. Unguided bioinformatics analysis on the transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic datasets confirmed that anaerobic glycolysis was affected and that the observed enzymatic changes in cardiac metabolism were directly linked to hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1 activation. Although metabolite concentrations were kept relatively constant, the combination of the proteomic and transcriptomic dataset improved the statistical confidence of the pathway analysis by 2 orders of magnitude. Importantly, proteomics revealed a reduced phosphorylation state of myosin light chain 2 and cardiac troponin I within the contractile apparatus of hibernating hearts in the absence of changes in protein abundance. Our study demonstrates how combining different "-omics" datasets aids in the identification of key biological pathways: chronic hypoxia resulted in a pronounced adaptive response at the transcript and the protein level to keep metabolite levels steady. This preservation of metabolic homeostasis is likely to contribute to the long-term survival of the hibernating myocardium.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21354174 PMCID: PMC3107937 DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2011.02.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol ISSN: 0022-2828 Impact factor: 5.000
Fig. 1Initiation and maintenance phase. (A) Immunohistochemical staining for hypoxia (HypoxyprobeTM) in the hibernating subendocardium after 3 weeks (3W-ON) and 7 weeks (7W-ON) of VEGF blockade. Brown staining indicates areas of hypoxia. Reduced hypoxyprobe staining was observed after 7 weeks (7W-ON) compared to 3 weeks (3W-ON) of VEGF blockade. Images are representative of 3 independent experiments. (B) qPCR analysis of GLUT1 and K(ATP) channels after 2, 3 and 5 weeks of VEGF blockade (2W-ON, 3W-ON, 5W-ON). Note that the maximum in SUR2A and Kir6.2 expression antedates peak levels of GLUT1. SUR2A: ATP-binding cassette; Kir6.2: potassium inwardly rectifying channel; *p-value < 0.05, **p-value < 0.01, n ≥ 3 per group. (C) qPCR analysis of FOXO1, a transcription factor regulating K(ATP) channel expression (n = 3). (D) Effect of glibenclamide, an inhibitor of K(ATP) channels, on GLUT1 gene expression in 2-week-old mice (n ≥ 4 per group).
Fig. 2Protein expression during the maintenance phase. Protein extracts from control and hibernating hearts after 6 weeks of VEGF blockade (6W-ON) were quantified using DIGE. Differentially expressed spots were numbered and identified by LC-MS/MS (Table 1).
Differentially expressed proteins identifications by tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)
| No. | Protein identity | Fold change hibernating vs control | SWISS PROT accession number | Theoretical pI/MW | Observed pI/MW | No of identified peptides | Sequence coverage (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 | Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase A | + 1.52 | 4.4e-05 | 0.0027 | ALDOA_MOUSE | 8.4 / 39.2 | 8.7 / 41.6 | 22 | 52.50% |
| 40 | Triosephosphate isomerase | + 1.43 | 0.0001 | 0.0038 | TPIS_MOUSE | 7.1 / 26.6 | 7.5 / 22.0 | 5 | 20.50% |
| 41 | Triosephosphate isomerase | + 1.35 | 0.0002 | 0.0055 | TPIS_MOUSE | 7.1 / 26.6 | 7.9 / 21.8 | 16 | 58.20% |
| 42 | Triosephosphate isomerase | + 2.13 | 1.2e-07 | 3.1e-5 | TPIS_MOUSE | 7.1 / 26.6 | 8.1 / 21.6 | 12 | 51.80% |
| 31 | Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase | + 1.41 | 1.1e-05 | 0.0010 | G3P_MOUSE | 8.1 / 47.7 | 8.6 / 35.7 | 9 | 28.80% |
| 16 | Pyruvate kinase, isozyme M1/M2 | + 1.23 | 0.040 | 0.24 | KPYM_MOUSE | 7.4 / 57.7 | 7.9 / 60.3 | 23 | 37.70% |
| 17 | Pyruvate kinase, isozyme M1/M2 | + 1.54 | 7.3e-07 | 9.8e-5 | KPYM_MOUSE | 7.4 / 57.7 | 8.1 / 60.0 | 19 | 29.90% |
| 18 | Pyruvate kinase, isozyme M1/M2 | + 1.24 | 0.0002 | 0.0048 | KPYM_MOUSE | 7.4 / 57.7 | 8.2 / 60.2 | 9 | 20.00% |
| 24 | Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component alpha subunit | + 1.66 | 0.0008 | 0.014 | ODPA_MOUSE | 8.5 / 43.2 | 7.7 / 48.7 | 15 | 30.00% |
| 29 | Aldose reductase | + 1.24 | 0.026 | 0.091 | ALDR_MOUSE | 6.8 / 35.6 | 7.8 / 36.0 | 13 | 38.60% |
| 33 | + 1.29 | 7.8e-05 | 0.0038 | LDHA_MOUSE | 7.6 / 29.5 | 8.2 / 33.3 | 11 | 30.10% | |
| 25 | Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, long-chain specific | −1.29 | 0.013 | 0.061 | ACADL_MOUSE | 8.5 / 47.9 | 7.6 / 45.0 | 2 | 5.12% |
| 34 | Delta3,5-delta2,4-dienoyl-CoA isomerase, mitochondrial | −1.23 | 0.003 | 0.028 | ECH1_MOUSE | 7.6 / 36.1 | 7.1 / 29.3 | 4 | 10.10% |
| 35 | Hydroxyacyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase, mitochondrial | −1.22 | 0.002 | 0.021 | HCDH_MOUSE | 8.8 / 34.5 | 8.6 / 32.0 | 12 | 22.00% |
| 20 | Glutamate dehydrogenase 1, mitochondrial | −1.23 | 0.022 | 0.082 | DHE3_MOUSE | 8.1 / 61.3 | 8.0 / 56.9 | 14 | 25.10% |
| 7 | Methylcrotonoyl-CoA carboxylase alpha chain, mitochondrial | −1.21 | 0.0004 | 0.008 | MCCA_MOUSE | 7.7 / 79.3 | 8.0 / 74.1 | 11 | 13.80% |
| 23 | Ornithine aminotransferase, mitochondrial | + 1.42 | 9.8e-08 | 3.1e-5 | OAT_MOUSE | 6.2 / 48.3 | 6.6 / 48.3 | 2 | 4.78% |
| 5 | Aconitate hydratase, mitochondrial | −1.20 | 0.021 | 0.078 | ACON_MOUSE | 8.1 / 85.4 | 8.0 / 80.0 | 6 | 7.95% |
| 6 | Aconitate hydratase, cytoplasmic | −1.29 | 0.034 | 0.095 | ACOC_MOUSE | 7.2 / 98.1 | 8.4 / 84.8 | 13 | 14.80% |
| 36 | ATP synthase gamma chain, mitochondrial | + 1.27 | 0.021 | 0.078 | ATPG_MOUSE | 9.1 / 32.8 | 9.1 /27.1 | 5 | 15.10% |
| 22 | Adenosine kinase | −1.25 | 0.029 | 0.093 | ADK_MOUSE | 7.2 / 31.1 | 6.4 / 46.0 | 2 | 3.88% |
| 27 | Creatine kinase M-type | −1.22 | 0.002 | 0.020 | KCRM_MOUSE | 6.6 / 43.0 | 8.0 / 43.8 | 24 | 54.10% |
| 49 | Adenylate kinase 4, mitochondrial | + 1.24 | 0.005 | 0.090 | KAD4_MOUSE | 7.0 / 25.1 | 7.9 / 23.5 | 8 | 35.00% |
| 48 | Peroxiredoxin 1 | + 1.35 | 0.0002 | 0.0055 | PRDX1_MOUSE | 8.3 / 22.2 | 8.7 / 18.3 | 11 | 42.20% |
| 44 | Peroxiredoxin 2 | + 1.23 | 0.011 | 0.056 | PRDX2_MOUSE | 5.2 / 21.8 | 5.0 / 18.4 | 6 | 24.70% |
| 9 | Protein disulfide-isomerase | + 1.32 | 0.001 | 0.014 | PDIA1_MOUSE | 4.8 / 57.1 | 4.6 / 59.9 | 5 | 8.64% |
| 14 | Protein disulfide-isomerase A3 | + 1.43 | 5.7e-06 | 0.00061 | PDIA3_MOUSE | 6.0 / 56.6 | 6.5 / 60.5 | 6 | 11.90% |
| 1 | 78 kDa glucose-regulated protein | + 2.18 | 3.8e-10 | 3.1e-05 | GRP78_MOUSE | 5.1 / 72.4 | 5.0 / 73.6 | 21 | 33.70% |
| 47 | Alpha crystallin B chain | + 1.46 | 9.6e-05 | 0.0038 | CRYAB_MOUSE | 6.8 / 20.1 | 8.0 / 17.6 | 10 | 45.10% |
| 39 | Heat-shock protein beta-1 (27 kDa) | + 1.36 | 0.002 | 0.020 | HSPB1_MOUSE | 6.1 / 23.0 | 6.1 / 22.2 | 2 | 9.09% |
| 8 | T-complex protein 1, zeta subunit | + 1.25 | 0.006 | 0.040 | TCPZ_MOUSE | 6.7 / 57.8 | 7.9 / 64.3 | 10 | 19.20% |
| 43 | Myosin regulatory light chain 2, ventricular/cardiac muscle isoform | −1.34 | 0.018 | 0.073 | MLRV_MOUSE | 4.7 /18.8 | 4.6 / 16.5 | 11 | 46.40% |
| 37 | Troponin I, cardiac muscle | −1.67 | 0.0003 | 0.0071 | TNNI3_MOUSE | 9.6 / 21.2 | 9.4 / 21.0 | 2 | 9.48% |
| 11 | Desmin | + 1.38 | 3.5e-05 | 0.0024 | DESM_MOUSE | 5.2 / 53.4 | 5.2 / 56.4 | 26 | 50.70% |
| 12 | Desmin | + 1.50 | 3.3e-07 | 5.8e-05 | DESM_MOUSE | 5.2 / 53.4 | 5.3 / 56.4 | 27 | 51.60% |
| 10 | Tubulin beta-2C chain | + 1.45 | 0.011 | 0.056 | TBB2C_MOUSE | 4.8 / 50.4 | 4.9 / 57.4 | 8 | 18.40% |
| 38 | Apolipoprotein A-I | + 1.70 | 0.001 | 0.016 | APA1_MOUSE | 5.6 / 30.6 | 5.4 / 20.4 | 6 | 19.70% |
| 15 | Fibrinogen beta chain | + 1.75 | 0.001 | 0.012 | FIBB_MOUSE | 6.7 / 54.7 | 6.8 / 58.9 | 10 | 21.00% |
| 13 | Fibrinogen gamma chain | + 1.22 | 0.02 | 0.23 | FIBG_MOUSE | 5.5 / 49.4 | 5.7 / 53.8 | 3 | 6.65% |
| 2 | Serotransferrin | + 1.32 | 0.003 | 0.028 | TRFE_MOUSE | 6.9 / 76.7 | 77.2 / 7.7 | 15 | 24.70% |
| 3 | Serotransferrin | + 1.34 | 0.001 | 0.018 | TRFE_MOUSE | 6.9 / 76.7 | 77.2 / 7.8 | 40 | 57.00% |
| 4 | Serotransferrin | + 1.34 | 0.002 | 0.019 | TRFE_MOUSE | 6.9 / 76.7 | 77.2 / 7.9 | 34 | 45.90% |
| 19 | Mixture: | −1.32 | 0.001 | 0.017 | |||||
| Succinyl-CoA:3-ketoacid-coenzyme A transferase 1, mitochondrial | SCOT1_MOUSE | 8.7 / 60.0 | 8.0 / 58.5 | 8 | 18.70% | ||||
| Cytosol aminopeptidase | AMPL_MOUSE | 6.7 / 56.0 | 8.0 / 58.5 | 5 | 13.30% | ||||
| 21 | Mixture: | −1.24 | 0.008 | 0.046 | |||||
| Beta-enolase | ENOB_MOUSE | 6.7 / 47.0 | 8.1 / 50.3 | 7 | 14.50% | ||||
| Fumarate hydratase, mitochondrial | FUMH_MOUSE | 9.1 / 54.2 | 8.1 / 50.3 | 3 | 5.72% | ||||
| 26 | Mixture | −1.23 | 0.009 | 0.049 | |||||
| Creatine kinase M-type | KCRM_MOUSE | 6.6 / 43.0 | 7.8 / 44.2 | 22 | 50.90% | ||||
| Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, long-chain specific | ACADL_MOUSE | 8.5 / 47.9 | 7.8 / 44.2 | 18 | 40.90% | ||||
| 30 | Mixture: | + 1.36 | 0.002 | 0.0055 | |||||
| Glyoxylate reductase/hydroxypyruvate reductase | GRHPR_MOUSE | 7.6 / 35.3 | 8.2 / 36.5 | 10 | 23.50% | ||||
| Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase | G3P_MOUSE | 8.5 / 35.7 | 8.2 / 36.5 | 8 | 29.10% | ||||
| 32 | Mixture: | −1.32 | 0.0008 | 0.014 | |||||
| Four and a half LIM domains protein 2 | FHL2_MOUSE | 7.3 / 32.1 | 8.0 / 33.5 | ||||||
| LDHA_MOUSE | 7.6 / 29.5 | 8.0 / 33.5 | 6 | 15.10% | |||||
| 45 | Mixture: | + 1.33 | 0.008 | 0.046 | |||||
| NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 beta subcomplex subunit 10 | NDUBA_MOUSE | 8.4 / 20.9 | 8.8 / 19.6 | 8 | 40.30% | ||||
| Cysteine and glycine-rich protein 3 | CSRP3_MOUSE | 8.9 / 20.8 | 8.8 / 19.6 | 3 | 24.70% | ||||
| 46 | Mixture: | + 1.30 | 0.007 | 0.043 | |||||
| Cysteine and glycine-rich protein 3 | CSRP3_MOUSE | 8.9 / 20.8 | 8.6 / 19.3 | 6 | 39.20% | ||||
| Glutathione S-transferase P1 | GSTP1_MOUSE | 8.1 / 23.5 | 8.6 / 19.3 | 5 | 37.60% |
pI denotes isoelectric point; MW, molecular weight.
Difference in-gel electrophoresis results were reproduced with different biological replicates using reverse-labeling (biological replicates n = 4 for control and hibernating hearts, with technical replicates n = 7). P-values for differences between the two groups were derived from unpaired t-tests using Decyder software (v6.5, GE healthcare). Corrections for multiple testing were performed by the Benjamini–Hochberg equation, yielding False Discovery rates (FDR). The differentially expressed proteins are numbered in Fig. 2.
Fig. 3Combined proteomic and transcriptomic investigation. Comparison between fold induction of mRNA expression (orange bars, log scaled) and protein changes (blue bars) in hibernating versus control hearts for proteins detected by DIGE (see Table 1). The proteins are grouped according to the GO annotations.
Fig. 4Protein expression and post-translational modifications. (A) Western blot analysis of GLUT1, LDH and IGFBP2 in hibernating and control hearts (6W-ON). (B, C) Phosphate-affinity gel electrophoresis for mobility shift detection of phosphorylated proteins. Significant changes were detected in the phosphorylation (upper panel, bands marked with an arrow) of myosin regulatory light chain 2 (MLC2, B) and cardiac troponin I (TnI, C) without differences in protein abundance (lower panels). Quantitative data are shown in Supplemental Figure 3. (D) Western blot analysis of anti-oxidant proteins in hibernating and control hearts. Densitometry data for SOD2 are provided in Supplemental Figure 3.
Fig. 5High-resolution 1H-NMR spectroscopy of cardiac tissue extracts. Representative spectra of the aliphatic region (− 0.05 to 4.2 ppm) from control (bottom) and hibernating hearts (top). Quantitative metabolite data are presented in Table 2.
Metabolite changes by 1H-NMR in cardiac tissue extracts.
| Control ( | Hibernating ( | Fold change | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leucine | 0.101 (± 0.005) | 0.075 (± 0.005) | ||
| Isoleucine | 0.414 (± 0.138) | 0.374 (± 0.107) | 0.90 | 0.828 |
| Valine | 0.105 (± 0.011) | 0.086 (± 0.008) | 0.82 | 0.214 |
| Isovalerate | 0.123 (± 0.034) | 0.143 (± 0.048) | 1.16 | 0.774 |
| Beta-OH butyrate | 0.145 (± 0.030) | 0.126 (± 0.026) | 0.87 | 0.654 |
| Lactate | 10.383 (± 0.784) | 11.689 (± 0.648) | 1.12 | 0.255 |
| Alanine | 1.680 (± 0.273) | 1.719 (± 0.106) | 1.02 | 0.878 |
| Acetate | 0.337 (± 0.053) | 0.310 (± 0.090) | 0.92 | 0.835 |
| Glutamate | 3.752 (± 0.258) | 2.563 (± 0.126) | ||
| Succinate | 1.234 (± 0.343) | 1.087 (± 0.119) | 0.88 | 0.638 |
| Glutamine | 2.873 (± 0.315) | 2.000 (± 0.186) | ||
| Aspartate | 0.266 (± 0.097) | 0.346 (± 0.073) | 1.30 | 0.534 |
| Choline | 0.077 (± 0.005) | 0.051 (± 0.004) | ||
| Phosphocholine | 0.173 (± 0.027) | 0.129 (± 0.013) | 0.75 | 0.145 |
| Carnitine | 0.546 (± 0.091) | 0.562 (± 0.033) | 1.03 | 0.845 |
| Taurine | 22.11 (± 1.937) | 16.01 (± 0.936) | ||
| Glycine | 0.572 (± 0.033) | 0.704 (± 0.082) | 1.23 | 0.282 |
| Creatine | 8.349 (± 0.937) | 6.051 (± 0.461) | ||
| Glycolic acid | 0.583 (± 0.026) | 0.572 (± 0.055) | 0.98 | 0.882 |
| Glucose | 0.218 (± 0.100) | 0.309 (± 0.061) | 1.42 | 0.438 |
| Fumerate | 0.085 (± 0.023) | 0.073 (± 0.012) | 0.86 | 0.622 |
| Tyrosine | 0.134 (± 0.068) | 0.036 (± 0.004) | 0.27 | 0.098 |
| Phenylalanine | 0.051 (± 0.005) | 0.043 (± 0.003) | 0.84 | 0.217 |
| Adenosine pool | 3.419 (± 0.357) | 2.808 (± 0.244) | 0.82 | 0.193 |
| NAD + NADH | 0.344 (± 0.093) | 0.360 (± 0.047) | 1.05 | 0.875 |
| Formate | 0.306 (± 0.015) | 0.300 (± 0.039) | 0.98 | 0.912 |
Data presented are given in μmol/g wet weight (mean ± SE), n = 3 for control and n = 5 for hibernating hearts. P-values for differences between the two groups were derived from unpaired t-tests (bold numbers highlight significant differences P < 0.05).
Fig. 6Bioinformatic analysis. (A) An interaction matrix was constructed using Cytoscape software. The nodes of the differentially expressed transcripts fall into 2 major clusters linked by transcription factor 4 and SNCAIP. (B) For pathway analysis, the transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic datasets were combined using the MetaCore™ systems biology analysis suite. Collective bioinformatic interrogation of the 3 different -omic datasets improved the statistical significance (visualized as an increase in the -log (p-value)) and resulted in a rearrangement in the ranking of the top scoring pathways (Supplemental Table III).