Literature DB >> 21353840

Colorectal cancer mortality prevented by use and attributable to nonuse of colonoscopy.

Christian Stock1, Amy B Knudsen, Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Ulrike Haug, Hermann Brenner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Use of colonoscopy is thought to reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality, but its impact at the population level is unclear.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of current colonoscopy use on CRC mortality and its further potential in reducing CRC mortality.
DESIGN: Population-level analysis was performed by using the concepts of prevented and attributable fractions, by using data from the National Health Interview Survey, the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program, and estimates of the effectiveness of colonoscopy at reducing CRC mortality.
SETTING: The 2005 U.S. population aged 50 years and older. EXPOSURE: Colonoscopy within 10 years or less. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Percentages and absolute numbers of CRC deaths prevented and potentially preventable by colonoscopy. LIMITATIONS: Uncertainty in effectiveness estimates.
RESULTS: Overall, the proportions of CRC deaths in 2005 prevented by colonoscopy (ie, the prevented fractions) range from 13% (95% CI, 11%-15%) to 19% (95% CI, 12%-24%) across the estimates of colonoscopy effectiveness. Corresponding numbers of CRC deaths prevented range from 7314 (95% CI, 6010-8467) to 11,711 (95% CI, 7077-14,898). The proportions of CRC deaths attributable to nonuse of colonoscopy (ie, the attributable fractions) range from 28% (95% CI, 22%-33%) to 44% (95% CI, 24%-60%), depending on the assumed effectiveness. Corresponding numbers of CRC deaths attributed to nonuse of colonoscopy range from 13,796 (95% CI, 11,076-16,255) to 22,088 (95% CI, 12,189-29,947).
CONCLUSIONS: Although we estimate that colonoscopy has prevented substantial numbers of CRC deaths, many more deaths could have been prevented with more widespread use. These findings highlight the potential benefits from public health interventions to increase the use of screening colonoscopy.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21353840     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  17 in total

1.  Colonoscopy Screening among Native Hawaiians at Queen's Medical Center between August 2011 and January 2013.

Authors:  Jodie M Kaalekahi; Krupa R Gandhi; John J Chen; Scott K Kuwada
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2016-01

2.  Colorectal cancer deaths attributable to nonuse of screening in the United States.

Authors:  Reinier G S Meester; Chyke A Doubeni; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; S Lucas Goede; Theodore R Levin; Virginia P Quinn; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Douglas A Corley; Ann G Zauber
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.797

Review 3.  Flexible sigmoidoscopy: more than a unilateral breast exam?

Authors:  Robert S Bresalier
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  The effect of marriage on utilization of colorectal endoscopy exam in the United States.

Authors:  Jim P Stimpson; Fernando A Wilson; Shinobu Watanabe-Galloway; M Kristen Peek
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Changes in Cancer Screening Rates Following a New Cancer Diagnosis in a Primary Care Patient Panel.

Authors:  Annabel Z Wang; Michael L Barnett; Jessica L Cohen
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-07-01

6.  Reducing racial and ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer screening is likely to require more than access to care.

Authors:  Jim P Stimpson; José A Pagán; Li-Wu Chen
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 7.  Opportunities and challenges for the use of large-scale surveys in public health research: a comparison of the assessment of cancer screening behaviors.

Authors:  Jada G Hamilton; Nancy Breen; Carrie N Klabunde; Richard P Moser; Bryan Leyva; Erica S Breslau; Sarah C Kobrin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Screening for Familial Colorectal Cancer Risk amongst Colonoscopy Patients New to an Open-Access Endoscopy Center.

Authors:  Sumana Moole; Thomas J McGarrity; Maria J Baker
Journal:  ISRN Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-03-22

9.  Impact of the National Endoscopy Database (NED) on colonoscopy withdrawal time: a tertiary centre experience.

Authors:  Mohamed G Shiha; Ammar Al-Rifaie; Mo Thoufeeq
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-07

10.  The rise of proximal colorectal cancer: a trend analysis of subsite specific primary colorectal cancer in the SEER database.

Authors:  Micheal Tadros; Sheena Mago; David Miller; Jane A Ungemack; Joseph C Anderson; Helen Swede
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-02-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.