Literature DB >> 21353829

Cell telephone ownership and social integration in persons with spinal cord injury.

Mary Joan Roach1, Amanda Harrington, Heather Powell, Gregory Nemunaitis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the prevalence and demographic characteristics associated with cell telephone ownership and to investigate whether cell telephone ownership has a positive relationship with social integration.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional.
SETTING: Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Model Systems. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (N=7696) with traumatic SCI who were entered into the National SCI Database and completed a follow-up interview from April 2004 through April 2009.
INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cell telephone ownership; Craig Handicap Assessment Reporting Technique Social Integration subscale.
RESULTS: A total of 73% of participants owned a cell telephone. Persons who were younger, employed, achieved education beyond grade school, and had computer and e-mail access were more likely to own cell telephones. Not owning a cell telephone decreased the likelihood of belonging to the high-social-integration group compared with the low-integration group (odds ratio, .509; 95% confidence interval, .396-.654). Persons with low or medium social integration scores were less likely to own a cell telephone than those who had high social integration scores.
CONCLUSION: In this study, most participants owned a cell telephone, although 27% did not compared with 13% nonowners in the general population. Owning a cell telephone increased the likelihood of being more socially integrated compared with non-cell telephone ownership.
Copyright © 2011 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21353829     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.09.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  6 in total

1.  Behavioral factors related to fatigue among persons with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Lee L Saunders; James S Krause
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Understanding and Preventing Loss to Follow-up: Experiences From the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems.

Authors:  Hwasoon Kim; Gary R Cutter; Brandon George; Yuying Chen
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2018

3.  Electronic device use by individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Gillian Mayman; Marisa Perera; Michelle A Meade; Joanna Jennie; Eric Maslowski
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  The Association Between Community Participation and Social Internet Use Among Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Jessica M Ketchum; Mitch Sevigny; Tessa Hart; Therese M O'Neil-Pirozzi; Angelle M Sander; Shannon B Juengst; Thomas F Bergquist; Laura E Dreer; Gale G Whiteneck
Journal:  J Head Trauma Rehabil       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 5.  Factors Which Facilitate or Impede Interpersonal Interactions and Relationships after Spinal Cord Injury: A Scoping Review with Suggestions for Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Delena Amsters; Sarita Schuurs; Kiley Pershouse; Bettina Power; Yvonne Harestad; Melissa Kendall; Pim Kuipers
Journal:  Rehabil Res Pract       Date:  2016-12-29

6.  Mental health in individuals with spinal cord injury: The role of socioeconomic conditions and social relationships.

Authors:  Carmen Zürcher; Hannah Tough; Christine Fekete
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.