Literature DB >> 21353596

Taking immunogenicity assessment of therapeutic proteins to the next level.

I C Büttel1, P Chamberlain, Y Chowers, F Ehmann, A Greinacher, R Jefferis, D Kramer, H Kropshofer, P Lloyd, A Lubiniecki, R Krause, A Mire-Sluis, T Platts-Mills, J A Ragheb, B M Reipert, H Schellekens, R Seitz, P Stas, M Subramanyam, R Thorpe, J-H Trouvin, M Weise, J Windisch, C K Schneider.   

Abstract

Therapeutic proteins provide innovative and effective therapies for numerous diseases. However, some of these products are associated with unwanted immunogenicity that may lead to clinical consequences such as reduced or loss of efficacy, altered pharmacokinetics (PK), general immune and hypersensitivity reactions, and neutralisation of the natural counterpart (e.g. the physiological hormone). Regulatory guidance on immunogenicity assessment needs to take into consideration a great diversity of products, indications and patient populations as well as constantly advancing manufacturing technologies. Such guidance needs to be sufficiently specific while, at the same time, allowing interactive discussion and adjusted benefit-risk weighing of each product on a case-by-case basis, e.g. for a unique treatment of a life threatening disease acceptable treatment risks may differ considerably from the ones in case of less serious disease. This theme was the focus of the international conference "Taking immunogenicity assessment of therapeutic proteins to the next level", held at the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut in Langen, Germany, on the 10-11. June 2010. The objectives of the conference were to highlight how the field could move from that of a mere description of risk factors to a system of risk assessment and mitigation, as well as an understanding of the impact of unwanted immunogenicity on the overall benefit/risk consideration for a medicinal product. More than 150 experts from industry, academia and regulatory authorities worldwide discussed the phenomenon of undesired immunogenicity from different perspectives. The conference focussed on issues relevant to three areas: (1) new European guidelines that are currently the subject of discussion; (2) testing strategies for immunogenicity assessment; and (3) scientific progress on the product-related factors that may contribute to the development of pathogenesis of immunogenicity, in particular in the field of protein aggregation and post-translational modifications. This report provides an overview of issues, insights, and conclusions that were discussed and achieved during the meeting.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21353596     DOI: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2011.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biologicals        ISSN: 1045-1056            Impact factor:   1.856


  41 in total

1.  Aggregation, immune complexes and immunogenicity.

Authors:  Roy Jefferis
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 2.  Immunogenicity to therapeutic proteins: impact on PK/PD and efficacy.

Authors:  Narendra Chirmule; Vibha Jawa; Bernd Meibohm
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 3.  Biosimilarity Versus Manufacturing Change: Two Distinct Concepts.

Authors:  Paul Declerck; Mourad Farouk-Rezk; Pauline M Rudd
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 4.  Molecular basis of high viscosity in concentrated antibody solutions: Strategies for high concentration drug product development.

Authors:  Dheeraj S Tomar; Sandeep Kumar; Satish K Singh; Sumit Goswami; Li Li
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 5.  Approaches to Mitigate the Unwanted Immunogenicity of Therapeutic Proteins during Drug Development.

Authors:  Laura I Salazar-Fontana; Dharmesh D Desai; Tarik A Khan; Renuka C Pillutla; Sandra Prior; Radha Ramakrishnan; Jennifer Schneider; Alexandra Joseph
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 6.  Mechanistic determinants of biotherapeutics absorption following SC administration.

Authors:  Wolfgang F Richter; Suraj G Bhansali; Marilyn E Morris
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 4.009

7.  Traceability of biopharmaceuticals in spontaneous reporting systems: a cross-sectional study in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and EudraVigilance databases.

Authors:  Niels S Vermeer; Sabine M J M Straus; Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse; Francois Domergue; Toine C G Egberts; Hubert G M Leufkens; Marie L De Bruin
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Safe anticoagulation when heart and lungs are "on vacation".

Authors:  Marina A Dobrovolskaia; Scott E McNeil
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-05

9.  Approaches to Resolve False Reporting in Neutralizing Antibody Assays Caused by Reagent Leaching from Affinity Capture Elution Solid Phase.

Authors:  Yuhong Xiang; John Kamerud; Jean Donley; Katrina Olson; Teresa Caiazzo; Dave Yeung; Chuenlei Parng; Boris Gorovits
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 4.009

10.  Universal immunoassay applied during early development of large molecules to understand impact of immunogenicity on biotherapeutic exposure.

Authors:  Ami C Bautista; Hossein Salimi-Moosavi; Vibha Jawa
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 4.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.