Literature DB >> 21353462

Explorative function in Williams syndrome analyzed through a large-scale task with multiple rewards.

F Foti1, L Petrosini, D Cutuli, D Menghini, F Chiarotti, S Vicari, L Mandolesi.   

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate spatial function in subjects with Williams syndrome (WS) by using a large-scale task with multiple rewards and comparing the spatial abilities of WS subjects with those of mental age-matched control children. In the present spatial task, WS participants had to explore an open space to search nine rewards placed in buckets arranged according to three spatial configurations: a cross, a 3 × 3 matrix and a cluster composed by three groups of three buckets each. The findings demonstrate that WS individuals were impaired in efficiently exploring the environment and in building cognitive spatial maps. In exploring the three spatial configurations, they performed worse than control subjects on all parameters analyzed. In fact, WS individuals took more time to complete the task, made more errors, performed a reduced number of error-free trials, displayed lower search efficiency, exhibited shorter spatial spans, showed a higher number of no-visits and displayed marked tendencies to perseverate and to neglect some buckets. Furthermore, WS individuals showed disorganized explorative patterns in comparison to control children. WS influenced performances differentially as a specific effect of the susceptibility of the configurations to being explored in a principled way. In the cross configuration that had strong spatial constraints, both groups exhibited their worst performances. In the matrix configuration, the altered explorative strategies of the WS subjects primarily affected their central exploration. The performances in the cluster configuration indicated that chunking was a strategy of strength in both TD and WS groups. In conclusion, WS individuals' deficits exhibited in the present explorative test may be considered an index of their difficulties in spatial orientation and motion perception displayed in the real world. The marked impairment in spatial information processing is discussed in neuro-anatomical alterations reported in WS.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21353462     DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Dev Disabil        ISSN: 0891-4222


  8 in total

Review 1.  Viewing the Personality Traits Through a Cerebellar Lens: a Focus on the Constructs of Novelty Seeking, Harm Avoidance, and Alexithymia.

Authors:  Laura Petrosini; Debora Cutuli; Eleonora Picerni; Daniela Laricchiuta
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Altered microstructure within social-cognitive brain networks during childhood in Williams syndrome.

Authors:  Brian W Haas; Naama Barnea-Goraly; Kristen E Sheau; Bun Yamagata; Shruti Ullas; Allan L Reiss
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Are the deficits in navigational abilities present in the Williams syndrome related to deficits in the backward inhibition?

Authors:  Francesca Foti; Stefano Sdoia; Deny Menghini; Laura Mandolesi; Stefano Vicari; Fabio Ferlazzo; Laura Petrosini
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-03-18

4.  Route knowledge and configural knowledge in typical and atypical development: a comparison of sparse and rich environments.

Authors:  Emily K Farran; Harry R M Purser; Yannick Courbois; Marine Ballé; Pascal Sockeel; Daniel Mellier; Mark Blades
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 4.025

5.  Path Integration and Cognitive Mapping Capacities in Down and Williams Syndromes.

Authors:  Mathilde Bostelmann; Paolo Ruggeri; Antonella Rita Circelli; Floriana Costanzo; Deny Menghini; Stefano Vicari; Pierre Lavenex; Pamela Banta Lavenex
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-12-11

6.  Learning by observation: insights from Williams syndrome.

Authors:  Francesca Foti; Deny Menghini; Laura Mandolesi; Francesca Federico; Stefano Vicari; Laura Petrosini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Learning by observation and learning by doing in Prader-Willi syndrome.

Authors:  Francesca Foti; Deny Menghini; Enzo Orlandi; Cristina Rufini; Antonino Crinò; Sabrina Spera; Stefano Vicari; Laura Petrosini; Laura Mandolesi
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 4.025

8.  New evidence for the cerebellar involvement in personality traits.

Authors:  Eleonora Picerni; Laura Petrosini; Fabrizio Piras; Daniela Laricchiuta; Debora Cutuli; Chiara Chiapponi; Sabrina Fagioli; Paolo Girardi; Carlo Caltagirone; Gianfranco Spalletta
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.558

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.