Literature DB >> 21352120

Psychoeducational multi-family group treatment with adolescents at high risk for developing psychosis.

Mary P O'Brien1, Jamie L Zinberg, Carrie E Bearden, Melita Daley, Tara A Niendam, Alex Kopelowicz, Tyrone D Cannon.   

Abstract

AIM: In this study, we investigate the feasibility and acceptability of a 9-month psychoeducational multi-family group (PMFG) intervention for adolescents who are at ultra-high-risk (UHR) for developing psychosis.
METHODS: The treatment programme was adapted from those previously shown to be effective in patients with established psychotic illness, but emphasizes content relevant to adolescence and to a pre-onset phase of illness.
RESULTS: Participants report that psychoeducational presentations are highly useful, they attend the PMFG group sessions regularly and report feeling comfortable in meetings and benefiting from them, and adolescents demonstrate improvement in symptoms and functional outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: This study was not a randomized controlled trial and multiple interventions were introduced simultaneously; thus, changes in outcome cannot be attributed to the PMFG intervention per se. Nonetheless, these results establish the acceptability of PMFG to adolescents and families, and encourage further research into the potential positive impact of PMFG with this at-risk population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 21352120     DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7893.2007.00046.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry        ISSN: 1751-7885            Impact factor:   2.732


  7 in total

Review 1.  Intervention in at-risk states for developing psychosis.

Authors:  Stephan Ruhrmann; Frauke Schultze-Lutter; Andreas Bechdolf; Joachim Klosterkötter
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 2.  Clinical high risk for psychosis in children and adolescents: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jordina Tor; Montserrat Dolz; Anna Sintes; Daniel Muñoz; Marta Pardo; Elena de la Serna; Olga Puig; Gisela Sugranyes; Inmaculada Baeza
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.785

3.  Attenuated psychotic symptom interventions in youth at risk of psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniel J Devoe; Megan S Farris; Parker Townes; Jean Addington
Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 2.732

4.  A randomized trial of family focused treatment for adolescents and young adults at risk for psychosis: study rationale, design and methods.

Authors:  Danielle A Schlosser; David J Miklowitz; Mary P O'Brien; Sandra D De Silva; Jamie L Zinberg; Tyrone D Cannon
Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 2.732

5.  Family problem solving interactions and 6-month symptomatic and functional outcomes in youth at ultra-high risk for psychosis and with recent onset psychotic symptoms: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Mary P O'Brien; Jamie L Zinberg; Lorena Ho; Alexandra Rudd; Alex Kopelowicz; Melita Daley; Carrie E Bearden; Tyrone D Cannon
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Environmental Risk and Protective Factors and Their Influence on the Emergence of Psychosis.

Authors:  Danielle A Schlosser; Rahel Pearson; Veronica B Perez; Rachel L Loewy
Journal:  Adolesc Psychiatry (Hilversum)       Date:  2012-04

7.  The Ohio State University Early Psychosis Intervention Center (EPICENTER) step-based care programme for individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis: study protocol for an observational study.

Authors:  Nicholas J K Breitborde; Hossam Guirgis; Walter Stearns; Kristen M Carpenter; Ghada Lteif; Jacob G Pine; Nichole Storey; Heather Wastler; Aubrey M Moe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.