| Literature DB >> 21352090 |
Tomoya Kuroda1, Tomoyuki Matsumoto, Yutaka Mifune, Tomoaki Fukui, Seiji Kubo, Takehiko Matsushita, Takayuki Asahara, Masahiro Kurosaka, Ryosuke Kuroda.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) is considered a promising choice for the treatment of cartilage defects. However, the application of ACI to osteoarthritic patients is, in general, contraindicated. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of three-dimensionally structured ACI (3D-ACI; CaReS) in a rat model of knee osteoarthritis (OA).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21352090 PMCID: PMC3078539 DOI: 10.3109/03009734.2011.552812
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ups J Med Sci ISSN: 0300-9734 Impact factor: 2.384
Figure 1.Rat osteoarthritis (OA) model with anterior cruciate ligament transection. A: Macroscopic appearance of the anterior cruciate ligament transection (ACLT) model of rat OA. At 2 weeks post-surgery, the joints have obvious articular surface damage and osteophyte formation around the margin of the medial femoral condyles and the patella groove. B: Toluidine blue staining showing the thickness of gradual degeneration of the patellar groove (Original magnification ×20).
Figure 2.Cartilage regeneration by transplanted human cells. A: Representative double immunostaining for hCOL2 (green) and HLA-ABC (red) using tissue sample of the regenerated articular cartilage at week 4 (original magnification ×200).Human-derived chondrocytes were identified as double-stained cells with hCOL2 and HLA-ABC at the chondral repair site in the CI group (yellow area), but not in the other groups. B: RT-PCR analysis for human-specific chondrogenic markers of tissue RNA isolated from the chondral repair sites. Expression of hCOL2 and hSOX9 was detected in the CI group, but not in the other groups. 1: CI group. 2: Collagen group. 3: Sham group. 4: Chondrocytes (positive control). 5: No RNA (negative control).
Figure 3.Macroscopic and histological evaluation at weeks 4, 8, and 20. A: Macroscopic assessment showing a better recovery as judged by a relatively smooth surface of the articular cartilage in the CI group compared to the other groups at weeks 4 and 8. In contrast, there was no apparent difference in the thickness of the articular cartilage between the three groups at week 20. Arrows indicate the defect area. B:Histological assessment with toluidine blue staining showing that the thickness of the articular cartilage was higher in the CI group than in the other groups at weeks 4, 8, and 20. However, at week 20, the thickness of the articular cartilage was decreasing in all groups. Arrow heads indicate the thickness of the articular cartilage.