Literature DB >> 21351858

Comparative effectiveness research: guidelines for good practices are just the beginning.

Michael L Johnson1, Abhishek S Chitnis.   

Abstract

The International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research formed a task force to gather state-of-the-art recommendations on good research practices for comparative effectiveness research using retrospective databases. The report of the task force was published in three sections in the journal Value in Health in December 2009, and addressed issues of design, analysis, framing the research question, and reporting and interpreting the findings from nonrandomized studies of treatment effects. This article will briefly examine the structure, process and outcomes of that task force, comment on the potential impact of the report in the context of comparative effectiveness research, and offer a few observations on the future of this field.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21351858     DOI: 10.1586/erp.10.93

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res        ISSN: 1473-7167            Impact factor:   2.217


  1 in total

1.  Comparative effectiveness research of chronic hepatitis B and C cohort study (CHeCS): improving data collection and cohort identification.

Authors:  Mei Lu; Loralee B Rupp; Anne C Moorman; Jia Li; Talan Zhang; Lois E Lamerato; Scott D Holmberg; Philip R Spradling; Eyasu H Teshale; Vinutha Vijayadeva; Joseph A Boscarino; Mark A Schmidt; David R Nerenz; Stuart C Gordon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.199

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.