OBJECTIVES: Men who have sex with men (MSM) bear the greatest burden of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) in every state in the U.S., but their populations are poorly defined. We estimated and compared populations of MSM in 2007 by region, state, and race/ethnicity. METHODS: We averaged findings from two statistical models we had previously developed to estimate the total state-specific percentage and number of males who were MSM. The models were based, respectively, on state-specific rural/ suburban/urban characteristics and an index using state-specific household census data on same-sex male unmarried partners. A third model, based on racial/ethnic ratios from a nationally representative behavioral survey, partitioned these statewide numbers by race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Of an estimated 7.1 million MSM residing in the U.S. in 2007, 71.4% (5.1 million) were white, 15.9% (1.1 million) were Hispanic, 8.9% (635,000) were black, 2.7% (191,000) were Asian, 0.4% (26,000) were American Indian/Alaska Native, 0.1% (6,000) were Native Hawaiian/other Pacific Islander, and 0.6% (41,000) were of multiple/unknown race/ethnicity. The overall U.S. percentage of males who were MSM (6.4%) varied from 3.3% in South Dakota to 13.2% in the District of Columbia, which we treated as a state. Estimated numbers of MSM ranged from 9,612 in Wyoming to 1,104,805 in California. CONCLUSIONS: Plausible estimates of MSM populations by state and race/ethnicity can inform and guide HIV/AIDS surveillance, allocation of resources, and advocacy. They can help in the planning, implementation, and evaluation of HIV prevention programs and other services. Using MSM numbers as denominators, estimates of population-based MSM HIV incidence, prevalence, and mortality rates could help clarify national and state-level epidemic dynamics. Until corroborated by other modeling and/or empirical research, these estimates should be used with caution.
OBJECTIVES:Men who have sex with men (MSM) bear the greatest burden of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) in every state in the U.S., but their populations are poorly defined. We estimated and compared populations of MSM in 2007 by region, state, and race/ethnicity. METHODS: We averaged findings from two statistical models we had previously developed to estimate the total state-specific percentage and number of males who were MSM. The models were based, respectively, on state-specific rural/ suburban/urban characteristics and an index using state-specific household census data on same-sex male unmarried partners. A third model, based on racial/ethnic ratios from a nationally representative behavioral survey, partitioned these statewide numbers by race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Of an estimated 7.1 million MSM residing in the U.S. in 2007, 71.4% (5.1 million) were white, 15.9% (1.1 million) were Hispanic, 8.9% (635,000) were black, 2.7% (191,000) were Asian, 0.4% (26,000) were American Indian/Alaska Native, 0.1% (6,000) were Native Hawaiian/other Pacific Islander, and 0.6% (41,000) were of multiple/unknown race/ethnicity. The overall U.S. percentage of males who were MSM (6.4%) varied from 3.3% in South Dakota to 13.2% in the District of Columbia, which we treated as a state. Estimated numbers of MSM ranged from 9,612 in Wyoming to 1,104,805 in California. CONCLUSIONS: Plausible estimates of MSM populations by state and race/ethnicity can inform and guide HIV/AIDS surveillance, allocation of resources, and advocacy. They can help in the planning, implementation, and evaluation of HIV prevention programs and other services. Using MSM numbers as denominators, estimates of population-based MSM HIV incidence, prevalence, and mortality rates could help clarify national and state-level epidemic dynamics. Until corroborated by other modeling and/or empirical research, these estimates should be used with caution.
Authors: J A Catania; D Osmond; R D Stall; L Pollack; J P Paul; S Blower; D Binson; J A Canchola; T C Mills; L Fisher; K H Choi; T Porco; C Turner; J Blair; J Henne; L L Bye; T J Coates Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: H Irene Hall; Ruiguang Song; Philip Rhodes; Joseph Prejean; Qian An; Lisa M Lee; John Karon; Ron Brookmeyer; Edward H Kaplan; Matthew T McKenna; Robert S Janssen Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-08-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Spencer Lieb; Samuel R Friedman; Mary Beth Zeni; Dale D Chitwood; Thomas M Liberti; Gary J Gates; Lisa R Metsch; Lorene M Maddox; Tamara Kuper Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Spencer Lieb; Mary Jo Trepka; Daniel R Thompson; Paul Arons; Thomas Liberti; Lorene Maddox; Lisa Metsch; Marlene LaLota; Stephen J Fallon Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2007-12-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Amina P Alio; Sheldon D Fields; Damon L Humes; Catherine A Bunce; Stephaun E Wallace; Cindi Lewis; Heather Elder; Steven Wakefield; Michael C Keefer Journal: J Gay Lesbian Soc Serv Date: 2014-07-01
Authors: J F G Monteiro; D J Escudero; C Weinreb; T Flanigan; S Galea; S R Friedman; B D L Marshall Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2016-01-12 Impact factor: 2.451
Authors: Oscar Patterson-Lomba; Edward Goldstein; Andrés Gómez-Liévano; Carlos Castillo-Chavez; Sherry Towers Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Michele Peake Andrasik; Christian Chandler; Borris Powell; Damon Humes; Steven Wakefield; Katharine Kripke; Daniel Eckstein Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-02-13 Impact factor: 9.308