PURPOSE: Anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF) therapies are associated with severe mycobacterial infections in rheumatoid arthritis patients. We developed and validated electronic record search algorithms for these serious infections. METHODS: The study used electronic clinical, microbiologic, and pharmacy records from Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) and the Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center (PVAMC). We identified suspect tuberculosis and nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) cases using inpatient and outpatient diagnostic codes, culture results, and anti-tuberculous medication dispensing. We manually reviewed records to validate our case-finding algorithms. RESULTS: We identified 64 tuberculosis and 367 NTM potential cases, respectively. For tuberculosis, diagnostic code positive predictive value (PPV) was 54% at KPNC and 9% at PVAMC. Adding medication dispensings improved these to 87% and 46%, respectively. Positive tuberculosis cultures had a PPV of 100% with sensitivities of 79% (KPNC) and 55% (PVAMC). For NTM, the PPV of diagnostic codes was 91% (KPNC) and 76% (PVAMC). At KPNC, ≥ 1 positive NTM culture was sensitive (100%) and specific (PPV, 74%) if non-pathogenic species were excluded; at PVAMC, ≥1 positive NTM culture identified 76% of cases with PPV of 41%. Application of the American Thoracic Society NTM microbiology criteria yielded the highest PPV (100% KPNC, 78% PVAMC). CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity and predictive value of electronic microbiologic data for tuberculosis and NTM infections is generally high, but varies with different facilities or models of care. Unlike NTM, tuberculosis diagnostic codes have poor PPV, and in the absence of laboratory data, should be combined with anti-tuberculous therapy dispensings for pharmacoepidemiologic research.
PURPOSE: Anti-tumornecrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF) therapies are associated with severe mycobacterial infections in rheumatoid arthritispatients. We developed and validated electronic record search algorithms for these serious infections. METHODS: The study used electronic clinical, microbiologic, and pharmacy records from Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) and the Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center (PVAMC). We identified suspect tuberculosis and nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) cases using inpatient and outpatient diagnostic codes, culture results, and anti-tuberculous medication dispensing. We manually reviewed records to validate our case-finding algorithms. RESULTS: We identified 64 tuberculosis and 367 NTM potential cases, respectively. For tuberculosis, diagnostic code positive predictive value (PPV) was 54% at KPNC and 9% at PVAMC. Adding medication dispensings improved these to 87% and 46%, respectively. Positive tuberculosis cultures had a PPV of 100% with sensitivities of 79% (KPNC) and 55% (PVAMC). For NTM, the PPV of diagnostic codes was 91% (KPNC) and 76% (PVAMC). At KPNC, ≥ 1 positive NTM culture was sensitive (100%) and specific (PPV, 74%) if non-pathogenic species were excluded; at PVAMC, ≥1 positive NTM culture identified 76% of cases with PPV of 41%. Application of the American Thoracic Society NTM microbiology criteria yielded the highest PPV (100% KPNC, 78% PVAMC). CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity and predictive value of electronic microbiologic data for tuberculosis and NTM infections is generally high, but varies with different facilities or models of care. Unlike NTM, tuberculosis diagnostic codes have poor PPV, and in the absence of laboratory data, should be combined with anti-tuberculous therapy dispensings for pharmacoepidemiologic research.
Authors: David E Griffith; Timothy Aksamit; Barbara A Brown-Elliott; Antonino Catanzaro; Charles Daley; Fred Gordin; Steven M Holland; Robert Horsburgh; Gwen Huitt; Michael F Iademarco; Michael Iseman; Kenneth Olivier; Stephen Ruoss; C Fordham von Reyn; Richard J Wallace; Kevin Winthrop Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2007-02-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Sebastian Schneeweiss; Ari Robicsek; Richard Scranton; Dan Zuckerman; Daniel H Solomon Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2006-12-18 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Michael A Gardam; Edward C Keystone; Richard Menzies; Steven Manners; Emil Skamene; Richard Long; Donald C Vinh Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Deborah S Yokoe; Steven W Coon; Rachel Dokholyan; Michael C Iannuzzi; Timothy F Jones; Sarah Meredith; Marisa Moore; Lynelle Phillips; Wayne Ray; Stephanie Schech; Deborah Shatin; Richard Platt Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: Jennifer Adjemian; Kenneth N Olivier; Amy E Seitz; Joseph O Falkinham; Steven M Holland; D Rebecca Prevots Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2012-07-05 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Theodore K Marras; Christopher Vinnard; Quanwu Zhang; Keith Hamilton; Jennifer Adjemian; Gina Eagle; Raymond Zhang; Engels Chou; Kenneth N Olivier Journal: Respir Med Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 3.415
Authors: Jennifer Adjemian; Kenneth N Olivier; Amy E Seitz; Steven M Holland; D Rebecca Prevots Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2012-02-03 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Christina T Fiske; Marie R Griffin; Ed Mitchel; Timothy R Sterling; Carlos G Grijalva Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2012-04-24 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Alicen B Spaulding; Yi Ling Lai; Adrian M Zelazny; Kenneth N Olivier; Sameer S Kadri; D Rebecca Prevots; Jennifer Adjemian Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2017-11
Authors: Sara G Murray; Gabriela Schmajuk; Laura Trupin; Erica Lawson; Matthew Cascino; Jennifer Barton; Mary Margaretten; Patricia P Katz; Edward H Yelin; Jinoos Yazdany Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Laura Jean Podewils; Emily Alexy; Stephani Jean Driver; James E Cheek; Robert C Holman; Dana Haberling; Meghan Brett; Eugene McCray; John T Redd Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2014 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.792