Literature DB >> 21351114

Efficacy of selective transarterial chemoembolization in inducing tumor necrosis in small (<5 cm) hepatocellular carcinomas.

Rita Golfieri1, Alberta Cappelli, Alessandro Cucchetti, Fabio Piscaglia, Maria Carpenzano, Eugenia Peri, Matteo Ravaioli, Antonia D'Errico-Grigioni, Antonio Daniele Pinna, Luigi Bolondi.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is commonly used as a bridge therapy for patients awaiting liver transplantation (LT) and for downstaging patients initially not meeting the Milan criteria. The primary aim of this study was to analyze whether a difference exists between selective/superselective and lobar TACE in determining tumor necrosis by a pathological analysis of the whole lesion at the time of LT. The secondary aim was to investigate the relationship between the tumor size and the capacity of TACE to induce necrosis. Data were extracted from a prospective database of 67 consecutive patients who underwent LT for hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis from 2003 to 2009 and were treated exclusively with TACE as a bridging (n = 53) or downstaging therapy (n = 14). We identified 122 nodules; 53.3% were treated with selective/superselective TACE. The mean histological necrosis level was 64.7%; complete tumor necrosis was obtained in 42.6% of the nodules. In comparison with lobar TACE, selective/superselective TACE led to significantly higher mean levels of necrosis (75.1% versus 52.8%, P = 0.002) and a higher rate of complete necrosis (53.8% versus 29.8%, P = 0.013). A significant direct relationship was observed between the tumor diameter and the mean tumor necrosis level (59.6% for lesions < 2 cm, 68.4% for lesions of 2.1-3 cm, and 76.2% for lesions > 3 cm). Histological necrosis was maximal for tumors > 3 cm: 91.8% after selective/superselective TACE and 66.5% after lobar procedures. Independent predictors of complete tumor necrosis were selective/superselective TACE (P = 0.049) and the treatment of single nodules (P = 0.008). Repeat sessions were more frequently needed for nodules treated with lobar TACE (31.6% versus 59.3%, P = 0.049).
CONCLUSION: Selective/superselective TACE was more successful than lobar procedures in achieving complete histological necrosis, and TACE was more effective in 3- to 5-cm tumors than in smaller ones.
Copyright © 2011 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21351114     DOI: 10.1002/hep.24246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatology        ISSN: 0270-9139            Impact factor:   17.425


  87 in total

1.  Increasing disparity in waitlist mortality rates with increased model for end-stage liver disease scores for candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma versus candidates without hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  David Goldberg; Benjamin French; Peter Abt; Sandy Feng; Andrew M Cameron
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.799

2.  Neoadjuvant Locoregional Therapy and Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Min Xu; Mb Majella Doyle; Babak Banan; Neeta Vachharajani; Xuanchuan Wang; Nael Saad; Kathryn Fowler; Elizabeth M Brunt; Yiing Lin; William C Chapman
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 3.  Management of patients with hepatitis B who require immunosuppressive therapy.

Authors:  Jessica P Hwang; Anna S-F Lok
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 4.  Bridging and downstaging treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation.

Authors:  Maurizio Pompili; Giampiero Francica; Francesca Romana Ponziani; Roberto Iezzi; Alfonso Wolfango Avolio
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  High intensity focused ultrasound, liver disease and bridging therapy.

Authors:  Luigi Mearini
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Treatment of intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Alejandro Forner; Marine Gilabert; Jordi Bruix; Jean-Luc Raoul
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Multicenter Study of Staging and Therapeutic Predictors of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence Following Transplantation.

Authors:  Theodore H Welling; Kevin Eddinger; Kristen Carrier; Danting Zhu; Tyler Kleaveland; Derek E Moore; Douglas E Schaubel; Peter L Abt
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 8.  Clinical trials of combined molecular targeted therapy and locoregional therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Hwi Young Kim; Joong-Won Park
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 11.740

Review 9.  Radioembolization with Yttrium-90 microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma: Role and perspectives.

Authors:  Cristina Mosconi; Alberta Cappelli; Cinzia Pettinato; Rita Golfieri
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-04-18

Review 10.  Diagnostic and therapeutic management of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Francesco Bellissimo; Marilia Rita Pinzone; Bruno Cacopardo; Giuseppe Nunnari
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.