Literature DB >> 21350875

Second-line neoadjuvant vinorelbine and gemcitabine combination in locally advanced breast cancer showing no early response to TAC.

A Halim1, H Wahba.   

Abstract

Due to socioeconomic issues, locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) is still a common presentation of breast cancer in the third world. It was found that LABC patients showing a clinical response after two to four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy have a higher probability of obtaining a pathological complete response at surgery than patients without an early response. In the present work, the short-term effects and toxicity of the neoadjuvant second-line vinorelbine and gemcitabine combination were evaluated in the treatment of LABC who did not show early response to anthracyclines and taxanes-containing regimen. The use of vinorelbine and gemcitabine was based on their use in metastatic breast cancer cases who had been treated before with anthracyclines and taxanes. This was a prospective phase II study accomplished at the Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine Department of Mansoura University, Egypt. Seventy LABC patients not suitable for breast conservative surgery who failed to achieve early response to two cycles of a combination of docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC) were treated with a 3-weekly regimen of vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) plus gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m(2) given on days 1 and 8 by intravenous infusion as a second-line neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Response was assessed after the second cycle. Stable and progressed patients were operated upon while responding cases received up to four cycles before the operation. Patient accrual was from June 20, 2007, to October 20, 2009. The objective response was evaluated clinically with breast sonography before every new cycle and before operation while the pathological response was determined postoperatively. The toxicity was evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute--Common Toxicity criteria version 3. The end points of this study were clinical response rate, pathological response rate, and treatment toxicity. Clinical response rate was achieved in 35 cases (50%) while pathological response rate was reported in 4 cases (5.7%). Breast conservative surgery (BCS) became possible in 31 cases (44%). The most common severe toxicities (grades 3 and 4) were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 25.7 and 22.8% of cases, respectively. Toxicities were reversible and did not cause death. It is possible to achieve objective clinical and pathological responses of LABC with potentially non-cross-resistant neoadjuvant second-line therapy, leading to BCS in a high proportion of patients. Thus, preoperative second-line chemotherapy appears to be justified when breast conservation is an important treatment goal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21350875     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-011-9868-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  26 in total

Review 1.  Primary chemotherapy for breast cancer: the evidence and the future.

Authors:  M S Mano; A Awada
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 2.  Mechanism of action of antitumor drugs that interact with microtubules and tubulin.

Authors:  M A Jordan
Journal:  Curr Med Chem Anticancer Agents       Date:  2002-01

3.  Neoadjuvant 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy followed by docetaxel in refractory patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  W Heller; D Mazhar; R Ward; H D Sinnett; C Lowdell; R Phillips; S Shousha; A Fayaz; C Palmieri; R C Coombes
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 4.  Breast cancer in South America: challenges to improve early detection and medical management of a public health problem.

Authors:  G Schwartsmann
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Dose-dense doxorubicin, docetaxel, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support with or without tamoxifen as preoperative therapy in patients with operable carcinoma of the breast: a randomized, controlled, open phase IIb study.

Authors:  G von Minckwitz; S D Costa; G Raab; J U Blohmer; H Eidtmann; J Hilfrich; E Merkle; C Jackisch; G Gademann; A H Tulusan; W Eiermann; E Graf; M Kaufmann
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Management of locally advanced breast cancer: evolution and current practice.

Authors:  Ashish Rustogi; Ashwini Budrukkar; Ketayun Dinshaw; Rakesh Jalali
Journal:  J Cancer Res Ther       Date:  2005 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.805

7.  A Phase II study of capecitabine and vinorelbine in patients with metastatic breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes.

Authors:  Laura G Estévez; Norberto Batista; Pedro Sánchez-Rovira; Amalia Velasco; Mariano Provencio; Ana León; Manuel Dómine; Josefina Cruz; Milva Rodríguez
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Capecitabine and vinorelbine as first-line treatment in elderly patients (> or =65 years) with metastatic breast cancer. A phase II trial (SAKK 25/99).

Authors:  D Hess; D Koberle; B Thurlimann; O Pagani; A Schonenberger; S Mattmann; C Rochlitz; D Rauch; J C Schuller; P Ballabeni; K Ribi
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 2.935

9.  Radiosensitization of pancreatic cancer cells by 2',2'-difluoro-2'-deoxycytidine.

Authors:  T S Lawrence; E Y Chang; T M Hahn; L W Hertel; D S Shewach
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Clinical response after two cycles compared to HER2, Ki-67, p53, and bcl-2 in independently predicting a pathological complete response after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  Gunter von Minckwitz; Hans-Peter Sinn; Günter Raab; Sibylle Loibl; Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Holger Eidtmann; Jörn Hilfrich; Elisabeth Merkle; Christian Jackisch; Serban D Costa; Angelika Caputo; Manfred Kaufmann
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  2 in total

1.  Efficacy of vinorelbine-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Hui Gao; Qiuyun Li; Wei Wei; Y I Jiang; Huawei Yang; Jianlun Liu
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-06-09

2.  Phase I and II Study of Gemcitabine and Vinorelbine in Heavily Pretreated Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Pamela Abdayem; Marwan Ghosn; Vicente Valero; Ronald Walters; Banu Arun; James L Murray; Richard Theriault; Debbie Frye; Nuhad K Ibrahim
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 4.207

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.