Literature DB >> 21350777

In search of the skeletal stem cell: isolation and separation strategies at the macro/micro scale for skeletal regeneration.

David Gothard1, Rahul S Tare, Peter D Mitchell, Jonathan I Dawson, Richard O C Oreffo.   

Abstract

Skeletal stem cells (SSCs) show great capacity for bone and cartilage repair however, current in vitro cultures are heterogeneous displaying a hierarchy of differentiation potential. SSCs represent the diminutive true multipotent stem cell fraction of bone marrow mononuclear cell (BMMNC) populations. Endeavours to isolate SSCs have generated a multitude of separation methodologies. SSCs were first identified and isolated by their ability to adhere to culture plastic. Once isolated, further separation is achieved via culture in selective or conditioned media (CM). Indeed, preferential SSC growth has been demonstrated through selective in vitro culture conditions. Other approaches have utilised cell morphology (size and shape) as selection criteria. Studies have also targeted SSCs based on their preferential adhesion to specified compounds, individually or in combination, on both macro and microscale platforms. Nevertheless, most of these methods which represent macroscale function with relatively high throughput, yield insufficient purity. Consequently, research has sought to downsize isolation methodologies to the microscale for single cell analysis. The central approach is identification of the requisite cell populations of SSC-specific surface markers that can be targeted for isolation by either positive or negative selection. SELEX and phage display technology provide apt means to sift through substantial numbers of candidate markers. In contrast, single cell analysis is the paramount advantage of microfluidics, a relatively new field for cell biology. Here cells can be separated under continuous or discontinuous flow according to intrinsic phenotypic and physicochemical properties. The combination of macroscale quantity with microscale specificity to generate robust high-throughput (HT) technology for pure SSC sorting, isolation and enrichment offers significant implications therein for skeletal regenerative strategies as a consequence of lab on chip derived methodology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21350777     DOI: 10.1039/c0lc00575d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Chip        ISSN: 1473-0189            Impact factor:   6.799


  7 in total

Review 1.  Phage display--a powerful technique for immunotherapy: 1. Introduction and potential of therapeutic applications.

Authors:  Justyna Bazan; Ireneusz Całkosiński; Andrzej Gamian
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Surface acoustic wave (SAW) techniques in tissue engineering.

Authors:  Deming Jiang; Jingwen Liu; Yuxiang Pan; Liujing Zhuang; Ping Wang
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 5.249

3.  Stem Cell Separation Technologies.

Authors:  Beili Zhu; Shashi K Murthy
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Eng       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 5.163

4.  Prospective isolation of human bone marrow stromal cell subsets: A comparative study between Stro-1-, CD146- and CD105-enriched populations.

Authors:  David Gothard; Joanna Greenhough; Esther Ralph; Richard Oc Oreffo
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 7.813

5.  Regionally-derived cell populations and skeletal stem cells from human foetal femora exhibit specific osteochondral and multi-lineage differentiation capacity in vitro and ex vivo.

Authors:  David Gothard; Kelvin Cheung; Janos M Kanczler; David I Wilson; Richard O C Oreffo
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 6.832

6.  Size and dielectric properties of skeletal stem cells change critically after enrichment and expansion from human bone marrow: consequences for microfluidic cell sorting.

Authors:  Miguel Xavier; María C de Andrés; Daniel Spencer; Richard O C Oreffo; Hywel Morgan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 7.  Antibody Engineering for Pursuing a Healthier Future.

Authors:  Abdullah F U H Saeed; Rongzhi Wang; Sumei Ling; Shihua Wang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 5.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.