Literature DB >> 21350755

Support vector machine regression (SVR/LS-SVM)--an alternative to neural networks (ANN) for analytical chemistry? Comparison of nonlinear methods on near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy data.

Roman M Balabin1, Ekaterina I Lomakina.   

Abstract

In this study, we make a general comparison of the accuracy and robustness of five multivariate calibration models: partial least squares (PLS) regression or projection to latent structures, polynomial partial least squares (Poly-PLS) regression, artificial neural networks (ANNs), and two novel techniques based on support vector machines (SVMs) for multivariate data analysis: support vector regression (SVR) and least-squares support vector machines (LS-SVMs). The comparison is based on fourteen (14) different datasets: seven sets of gasoline data (density, benzene content, and fractional composition/boiling points), two sets of ethanol gasoline fuel data (density and ethanol content), one set of diesel fuel data (total sulfur content), three sets of petroleum (crude oil) macromolecules data (weight percentages of asphaltenes, resins, and paraffins), and one set of petroleum resins data (resins content). Vibrational (near-infrared, NIR) spectroscopic data are used to predict the properties and quality coefficients of gasoline, biofuel/biodiesel, diesel fuel, and other samples of interest. The four systems presented here range greatly in composition, properties, strength of intermolecular interactions (e.g., van der Waals forces, H-bonds), colloid structure, and phase behavior. Due to the high diversity of chemical systems studied, general conclusions about SVM regression methods can be made. We try to answer the following question: to what extent can SVM-based techniques replace ANN-based approaches in real-world (industrial/scientific) applications? The results show that both SVR and LS-SVM methods are comparable to ANNs in accuracy. Due to the much higher robustness of the former, the SVM-based approaches are recommended for practical (industrial) application. This has been shown to be especially true for complicated, highly nonlinear objects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21350755     DOI: 10.1039/c0an00387e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Analyst        ISSN: 0003-2654            Impact factor:   4.616


  24 in total

1.  Systematic assessment of analytical methods for drug sensitivity prediction from cancer cell line data.

Authors:  In Sock Jang; Elias Chaibub Neto; Juistin Guinney; Stephen H Friend; Adam A Margolin
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2014

2.  Incorporation of support vector machines in the LIBS toolbox for sensitive and robust classification amidst unexpected sample and system variability.

Authors:  Narahara Chari Dingari; Ishan Barman; Ashwin Kumar Myakalwar; Surya P Tewari; Manoj Kumar Gundawar
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Using near-infrared spectroscopy to determine intramuscular fat and fatty acids of beef applying different prediction approaches.

Authors:  Wilson Barragán-Hernández; Liliana Mahecha-Ledesma; William Burgos-Paz; Martha Olivera-Angel; Joaquín Angulo-Arizala
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Multivariate Calibration for Carbon Nanotubes in the Environment Using the Microwave Induced Heating Method.

Authors:  Yang He; Souhail R Al-Abed; Dionysios D Dionysiou
Journal:  Environ Nanotechnol Monit Manag       Date:  2019

5.  Predicting moisture content during maize nixtamalization using machine learning with NIR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Michael J Burns; Jonathan S Renk; David P Eickholt; Amanda M Gilbert; Travis J Hattery; Mark Holmes; Nickolas Anderson; Amanda J Waters; Sathya Kalambur; Sherry A Flint-Garcia; Marna D Yandeau-Nelson; George A Annor; Candice N Hirsch
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Estimation of diffusion coefficients from voltammetric signals by support vector and gaussian process regression.

Authors:  Martin Bogdan; Dominik Brugger; Wolfgang Rosenstiel; Bernd Speiser
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 5.514

7.  Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Coupled with Multivariate Chemometrics for Variety Discrimination of Soil.

Authors:  Ke-Qiang Yu; Yan-Ru Zhao; Fei Liu; Yong He
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Optimization of Operation Parameters for Helical Flow Cleanout with Supercritical CO2 in Horizontal Wells Using Back-Propagation Artificial Neural Network.

Authors:  Xianzhi Song; Chi Peng; Gensheng Li; Zhenguo He; Haizhu Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  An empirical investigation of deviations from the Beer-Lambert law in optical estimation of lactate.

Authors:  M Mamouei; K Budidha; N Baishya; M Qassem; P A Kyriacou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Machine learning algorithms for mode-of-action classification in toxicity assessment.

Authors:  Yile Zhang; Yau Shu Wong; Jian Deng; Cristina Anton; Stephan Gabos; Weiping Zhang; Dorothy Yu Huang; Can Jin
Journal:  BioData Min       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 2.522

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.