Thomas Gotschi1. 1. Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Promoting bicycling has great potential to increase overall physical activity; however, significant uncertainty exists with regard to the amount and effectiveness of investment needed for infrastructure. The objective of this study is to assess how costs of Portland's past and planned investments in bicycling relate to health and other benefits. METHODS: Costs of investment plans are compared with 2 types of monetized health benefits, health care cost savings and value of statistical life savings. Levels of bicycling are estimated using past trends, future mode share goals, and a traffic demand model. RESULTS: By 2040, investments in the range of $138 to $605 million will result in health care cost savings of $388 to $594 million, fuel savings of $143 to $218 million, and savings in value of statistical lives of $7 to $12 billion. The benefit-cost ratios for health care and fuel savings are between 3.8 and 1.2 to 1, and an order of magnitude larger when value of statistical lives is used. CONCLUSIONS: This first of its kind cost-benefit analysis of investments in bicycling in a US city shows that such efforts are cost-effective, even when only a limited selection of benefits is considered.
BACKGROUND: Promoting bicycling has great potential to increase overall physical activity; however, significant uncertainty exists with regard to the amount and effectiveness of investment needed for infrastructure. The objective of this study is to assess how costs of Portland's past and planned investments in bicycling relate to health and other benefits. METHODS: Costs of investment plans are compared with 2 types of monetized health benefits, health care cost savings and value of statistical life savings. Levels of bicycling are estimated using past trends, future mode share goals, and a traffic demand model. RESULTS: By 2040, investments in the range of $138 to $605 million will result in health care cost savings of $388 to $594 million, fuel savings of $143 to $218 million, and savings in value of statistical lives of $7 to $12 billion. The benefit-cost ratios for health care and fuel savings are between 3.8 and 1.2 to 1, and an order of magnitude larger when value of statistical lives is used. CONCLUSIONS: This first of its kind cost-benefit analysis of investments in bicycling in a US city shows that such efforts are cost-effective, even when only a limited selection of benefits is considered.
Authors: Billie Giles-Corti; James F Sallis; Takemi Sugiyama; Lawrence D Frank; Melanie Lowe; Neville Owen Journal: J Public Health Policy Date: 2015-01-22 Impact factor: 2.222
Authors: Anne C Lusk; Patrick Morency; Luis F Miranda-Moreno; Walter C Willett; Jack T Dennerlein Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-05-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Gregory Knell; Henry S Brown; Kelley P Gabriel; Casey P Durand; Kerem Shuval; Deborah Salvo; Harold W Kohl Journal: J Phys Act Health Date: 2019-04-13
Authors: Inés Alveano-Aguerrebere; Francisco Javier Ayvar-Campos; Maryam Farvid; Anne Lusk Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-12-22 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Thomas Götschi; Marko Tainio; Neil Maizlish; Tim Schwanen; Anna Goodman; James Woodcock Journal: Prev Med Date: 2015-02-24 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Regine Gerike; Audrey de Nazelle; Mark Nieuwenhuijsen; Luc Int Panis; Esther Anaya; Ione Avila-Palencia; Florinda Boschetti; Christian Brand; Tom Cole-Hunter; Evi Dons; Ulf Eriksson; Mailin Gaupp-Berghausen; Sonja Kahlmeier; Michelle Laeremans; Natalie Mueller; Juan Pablo Orjuela; Francesca Racioppi; Elisabeth Raser; David Rojas-Rueda; Christian Schweizer; Arnout Standaert; Tina Uhlmann; Sandra Wegener; Thomas Götschi Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-01-07 Impact factor: 2.692