Literature DB >> 21350018

Drosophila hedgehog signaling and engrailed-runt mutual repression direct midline glia to alternative ensheathing and non-ensheathing fates.

Joseph D Watson1, Scott R Wheeler, Stephanie B Stagg, Stephen T Crews.   

Abstract

The Drosophila CNS contains a variety of glia, including highly specialized glia that reside at the CNS midline and functionally resemble the midline floor plate glia of the vertebrate spinal cord. Both insect and vertebrate midline glia play important roles in ensheathing axons that cross the midline and secreting signals that control a variety of developmental processes. The Drosophila midline glia consist of two spatially and functionally distinct populations. The anterior midline glia (AMG) are ensheathing glia that migrate, surround and send processes into the axon commissures. By contrast, the posterior midline glia (PMG) are non-ensheathing glia. Together, the Notch and hedgehog signaling pathways generate AMG and PMG from midline neural precursors. Notch signaling is required for midline glial formation and for transcription of a core set of midline glial-expressed genes. The Hedgehog morphogen is secreted from ectodermal cells adjacent to the CNS midline and directs a subset of midline glia to become PMG. Two transcription factor genes, runt and engrailed, play important roles in AMG and PMG development. The runt gene is expressed in AMG, represses engrailed and maintains AMG gene expression. The engrailed gene is expressed in PMG, represses runt and maintains PMG gene expression. In addition, engrailed can direct midline glia to a PMG-like non-ensheathing fate. Thus, two signaling pathways and runt-engrailed mutual repression initiate and maintain two distinct populations of midline glia that differ functionally in gene expression, glial migration, axon ensheathment, process extension and patterns of apoptosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21350018      PMCID: PMC3050661          DOI: 10.1242/dev.056895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  45 in total

1.  Quantitative analysis of gene function in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  W D Tracey; X Ning; M Klingler; S G Kramer; J P Gergen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The single-minded gene of Drosophila is required for the expression of genes important for the development of CNS midline cells.

Authors:  J R Nambu; R G Franks; S Hu; S T Crews
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-10-05       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Single-cell mapping of neural and glial gene expression in the developing Drosophila CNS midline cells.

Authors:  Scott R Wheeler; Joseph B Kearney; Amaris R Guardiola; Stephen T Crews
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  Drosophila Neurexin IV stabilizes neuron-glia interactions at the CNS midline by binding to Wrapper.

Authors:  Tobias Stork; Silke Thomas; Floriano Rodrigues; Marion Silies; Elke Naffin; Stephanie Wenderdel; Christian Klämbt
Journal:  Development       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 6.868

5.  The midline of the Drosophila central nervous system: a model for the genetic analysis of cell fate, cell migration, and growth cone guidance.

Authors:  C Klämbt; J R Jacobs; C S Goodman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-02-22       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Dosage requirements for runt in the segmentation of Drosophila embryos.

Authors:  J P Gergen; E Wieschaus
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1986-04-25       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Dual roles for patched in sequestering and transducing Hedgehog.

Authors:  Y Chen; G Struhl
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  GFP in Drosophila.

Authors:  A Brand
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 11.639

9.  Axon-glial interactions at the Drosophila CNS midline.

Authors:  Stephen T Crews
Journal:  Cell Adh Migr       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 3.405

10.  Gap gene properties of the pair-rule gene runt during Drosophila segmentation.

Authors:  C Tsai; J P Gergen
Journal:  Development       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  14 in total

1.  Time-lapse imaging reveals stereotypical patterns of Drosophila midline glial migration.

Authors:  Scott R Wheeler; Joseph C Pearson; Stephen T Crews
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 3.582

2.  Enhancer diversity and the control of a simple pattern of Drosophila CNS midline cell expression.

Authors:  Joseph C Pearson; Stephen T Crews
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.582

3.  Chromatin profiling of Drosophila CNS subpopulations identifies active transcriptional enhancers.

Authors:  Joseph C Pearson; Daniel J McKay; Jason D Lieb; Stephen T Crews
Journal:  Development       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 6.868

4.  Formation and specification of a Drosophila dopaminergic precursor cell.

Authors:  Joseph D Watson; Stephen T Crews
Journal:  Development       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 5.  Drosophila Embryonic CNS Development: Neurogenesis, Gliogenesis, Cell Fate, and Differentiation.

Authors:  Stephen T Crews
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Probing the enigma: unraveling glial cell biology in invertebrates.

Authors:  Jaeda Coutinho-Budd; Marc R Freeman
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 7.  Origins of glial cell populations in the insect nervous system.

Authors:  Jaison J Omoto; Jennifer K Lovick; Volker Hartenstein
Journal:  Curr Opin Insect Sci       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 5.186

8.  Mastermind mutations generate a unique constellation of midline cells within the Drosophila CNS.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Randi Wheatley; Eric Fulkerson; Amanda Tapp; Patricia A Estes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A comparison of midline and tracheal gene regulation during Drosophila development.

Authors:  Sarah K R Long; Eric Fulkerson; Rebecca Breese; Giovanna Hernandez; Cara Davis; Mark A Melton; Rachana R Chandran; Napoleon Butler; Lan Jiang; Patricia Estes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Coordinated repression and activation of two transcriptional programs stabilizes cell fate during myogenesis.

Authors:  Lucia Ciglar; Charles Girardot; Bartek Wilczyński; Martina Braun; Eileen E M Furlong
Journal:  Development       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 6.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.