BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Injection therapies play a major role in the treatment of lower back pain and are to date performed mainly under CT or fluoroscopic guidance. The benefits of US-guided instillation procedures have been shown in many studies. We conducted this study to simplify an US-guided approach to the lumbar spinal nerves and to assess the feasibility and preliminary accuracy by means of CT and anatomic dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten US-guided injections at 5 different levels (L1-L5) were performed on 1 embalmed cadaver. Images in 3 sagittal/parasagittal scanning planes were obtained at each lumbar level: 1) the plane of the spinous processes, 2) the plane of the lumbar arches/zygapophyseal-joints, and 3) the plane of the transverse processes. The PAP was then defined by positioning the transducer perpendicularly over the medial part of the respective transverse processes, depicting the hyperechoic intertransverse ligament. In the "in-plane technique," spinal needles were advanced through the respective segmental intertransverse ligament. A solution consisting of a contrast agent and a pigmented dispersion was subsequently injected into the pararadicular compartment. An anatomic dissection of the specimen and CT scans were performed to verify the exact placement of the needle tips and to evaluate fluid dispersion in the punctured compartment. RESULTS: CT examination confirmed that each needle tip was correctly placed within the intended compartment with sufficient contrast accumulation around the respective proximal segment of the spinal nerve. On each anatomic section, dye was identified in the correct compartment and directly around each targeted spinal nerve with needles shown in the correct position. CONCLUSIONS: This modified US approach for therapeutic root injections in the lumbar spine by using the intertransverse ligament as a new anatomic landmark allows an easy and correct needle placement within the pararadicular compartment.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Injection therapies play a major role in the treatment of lower back pain and are to date performed mainly under CT or fluoroscopic guidance. The benefits of US-guided instillation procedures have been shown in many studies. We conducted this study to simplify an US-guided approach to the lumbar spinal nerves and to assess the feasibility and preliminary accuracy by means of CT and anatomic dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten US-guided injections at 5 different levels (L1-L5) were performed on 1 embalmed cadaver. Images in 3 sagittal/parasagittal scanning planes were obtained at each lumbar level: 1) the plane of the spinous processes, 2) the plane of the lumbar arches/zygapophyseal-joints, and 3) the plane of the transverse processes. The PAP was then defined by positioning the transducer perpendicularly over the medial part of the respective transverse processes, depicting the hyperechoic intertransverse ligament. In the "in-plane technique," spinal needles were advanced through the respective segmental intertransverse ligament. A solution consisting of a contrast agent and a pigmented dispersion was subsequently injected into the pararadicular compartment. An anatomic dissection of the specimen and CT scans were performed to verify the exact placement of the needle tips and to evaluate fluid dispersion in the punctured compartment. RESULTS: CT examination confirmed that each needle tip was correctly placed within the intended compartment with sufficient contrast accumulation around the respective proximal segment of the spinal nerve. On each anatomic section, dye was identified in the correct compartment and directly around each targeted spinal nerve with needles shown in the correct position. CONCLUSIONS: This modified US approach for therapeutic root injections in the lumbar spine by using the intertransverse ligament as a new anatomic landmark allows an easy and correct needle placement within the pararadicular compartment.
Authors: John A Carrino; William B Morrison; Laurence Parker; Mark E Schweitzer; David C Levin; Jonathan H Sunshine Journal: Radiology Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Klaus Galiano; Alois Albert Obwegeser; Gerd Bodner; Martin Freund; Herbert Maurer; Florian Stefan Kamelger; Reinhold Schatzer; Franz Ploner Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Klaus Galiano; Alois Albert Obwegeser; Gerd Bodner; Martin Cornelius Freund; Hannes Gruber; Herbert Maurer; Reinhold Schatzer; Thomas Fiegele; Franz Ploner Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2006 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.442
Authors: Klaus Galiano; Alois Albert Obwegeser; Reto Bale; Christoph Harlander; Reinhold Schatzer; Michael Schocke; Hannes Gruber Journal: Reg Anesth Pain Med Date: 2007 May-Jun Impact factor: 6.288
Authors: Klaus Galiano; Alois Albert Obwegeser; Claudia Walch; Reinhold Schatzer; Franz Ploner; Hannes Gruber Journal: Reg Anesth Pain Med Date: 2007 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 6.288
Authors: R Derby; G Kine; J A Saal; J Reynolds; N Goldthwaite; A H White; K Hsu; J Zucherman Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 1992-06 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Jan Fritz; Thomas Niemeyer; Stephan Clasen; Jakub Wiskirchen; Gunnar Tepe; Bruno Kastler; Thomas Nägele; Claudius W König; Claus D Claussen; Philippe L Pereira Journal: Radiographics Date: 2007 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Jochen Obernauer; Klaus Galiano; Hannes Gruber; Reto Bale; Alois Albert Obwegeser; Reinhold Schatzer; Alexander Loizides Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2013-07-23 Impact factor: 3.134