Literature DB >> 21349884

What do parents and carers think about routine outcome measures and their use? A focus group study of CAMHS attenders.

Philippa Moran1, Katerina Kelesidi, Sacha Guglani, Sue Davidson, Tamsin Ford.   

Abstract

Currently service user involvement in routine outcomes monitoring has been minimal, particularly in Children's services. There needs to be a more sustained effort to involve service users because of the valuable information that they could provide for service development and improvement. Focus groups were conducted with service users, including parents, carers and young people from a London CAMHS. Their views were elicited on routine outcomes monitoring in general, three specific approaches and suggestions about what else might be important to capture when measuring outcomes. The focus groups raised a number of issues pertinent to routine outcomes monitoring in general, including the reliability of answers, the need for the measures to reflect more than just a tick-box approach and that different people will have different perspectives. Analysis also focused on feedback about the three specific measures discussed. It is important that service users are involved in the process of outcome measurement, from the development of measures, to their application in therapeutic encounters and in service development. Outcome monitoring needs to become a more collaborative process in order that services are measuring what service users think is important, as most would agree that a service should deliver the outcomes that its users want to see.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21349884     DOI: 10.1177/1359104510391859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry        ISSN: 1359-1045            Impact factor:   2.544


  13 in total

1.  Routine Outcome Monitoring in CAMHS: How Can We Enable Implementation in Practice?

Authors:  S M Waldron; M E Loades; L Rogers
Journal:  Child Adolesc Ment Health       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.175

2.  The use of routine outcome monitoring in child semi-residential psychiatry: predicting parents' completion rates.

Authors:  Audri Lamers; Chijs van Nieuwenhuizen; Bart Siebelink; Thijs Blaauw; Robert Vermeiren
Journal:  Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.033

3.  When is Sessional Monitoring More Likely in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services?

Authors:  J H Edbrooke-Childs; D Gondek; J Deighton; P Fonagy; M Wolpert
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2016-05

4.  Learning from a Learning Collaboration: The CORC Approach to Combining Research, Evaluation and Practice in Child Mental Health.

Authors:  Isobel Fleming; Melanie Jones; Jenna Bradley; Miranda Wolpert
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2016-05

5.  Goal formulation and tracking in child mental health settings: when is it more likely and is it associated with satisfaction with care?

Authors:  Jenna Jacob; Davide De Francesco; Jessica Deighton; Duncan Law; Miranda Wolpert; Julian Edbrooke-Childs
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 4.785

6.  Implementation of routine outcome measurement in child and adolescent mental health services in the United Kingdom: a critical perspective.

Authors:  C L Hall; M Moldavsky; J Taylor; K Sayal; M Marriott; M J Batty; S Pass; C Hollis
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 4.785

7.  Uses and abuses of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs): potential iatrogenic impact of PROMs implementation and how it can be mitigated.

Authors:  Miranda Wolpert
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2014-03

8.  A qualitative process evaluation of electronic session-by-session outcome measurement in child and adolescent mental health services.

Authors:  Charlotte L Hall; John Taylor; Maria Moldavsky; Michael Marriott; Sarah Pass; Karen Newell; Robert Goodman; Kapil Sayal; Chris Hollis
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 9.  Measuring mental health and wellbeing outcomes for children and adolescents to inform practice and policy: a review of child self-report measures.

Authors:  Jessica Deighton; Tim Croudace; Peter Fonagy; Jeb Brown; Praveetha Patalay; Miranda Wolpert
Journal:  Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.033

10.  A Qualitative Exploration of Patient and Clinician Views on Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Child Mental Health and Diabetes Services.

Authors:  Miranda Wolpert; Katherine Curtis-Tyler; Julian Edbrooke-Childs
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2016-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.