OBJECTIVE: To study the improvement of metabolic control and cardiovascular risk factors, adherence, self-monitoring, self-care, attitudes and motivation in subjects with Type 2 Diabetes (DM2) in a specific Health Care Area after group intervention through the community: diabetes education (DE) and physical exercise (PE). DESIGN: A single blind, randomised controlled clinical trial. INTERVENTION: group 1: DE; group 2: ED and PE; group 3: only PE, and "control" group-4: Individual consultations. LOCATION: Urban health centre/municipal sports centre. PARTICIPANTS: 108 DM2, age: 40-70, glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1)c) ≤ 8.5%, blood pressure (BP)<160/90 and body mass index (BMI)<45, excluding those with chronic complications and/or acute decompensation. INTERVENTIONS: During 6 months, 8 workshops were held for group education and monitored aerobic physical exercise of moderate intensity (3 hours a week). MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Primary variable pre- and post- intervention: reduction in HbA(1)c; other variables: examination and analytical data, therapeutic compliance, self-monitoring, self-care, attitudes and motivation (DAS-3SP survey). RESULTS: After intervention, more diabetics had a lower HbA(1)c following a full intervention: "DE" and "PE", RR: 1.93 (0.85-4.40) and exercise, RR: 1.56 (0.65-3.76). With simultaneous DE and PE, the BMI, RR: 1.61 (0.85-3.03) and LDL cholesterol, RR: 1.82 (0.99-3.36), of many subjects decreased. Dietary compliance, RR: 1.29 (0.32-5.22) and exercise, RR: 1.93 (0.76-4.91) also increased, more patients performing their own checks, RR: 3.86 (0.90-16.55) and improving motivation/attitudes in "strict control management", RR: 1.48 (0.94-2.34). With PE, systolic and diastolic BP decreased in more patients RR: 1.35 (0.72-2.52), 1.87 (0.72-4.84) while in the DE group only diastolic values decreased 1.80 (0.69-4.67). CONCLUSIONS: Patient conditions improve more with the combination of DE and PE, though the results are not statistically significant, probably due to insufficient sample size.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To study the improvement of metabolic control and cardiovascular risk factors, adherence, self-monitoring, self-care, attitudes and motivation in subjects with Type 2 Diabetes (DM2) in a specific Health Care Area after group intervention through the community: diabetes education (DE) and physical exercise (PE). DESIGN: A single blind, randomised controlled clinical trial. INTERVENTION: group 1: DE; group 2: ED and PE; group 3: only PE, and "control" group-4: Individual consultations. LOCATION: Urban health centre/municipal sports centre. PARTICIPANTS: 108 DM2, age: 40-70, glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1)c) ≤ 8.5%, blood pressure (BP)<160/90 and body mass index (BMI)<45, excluding those with chronic complications and/or acute decompensation. INTERVENTIONS: During 6 months, 8 workshops were held for group education and monitored aerobic physical exercise of moderate intensity (3 hours a week). MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Primary variable pre- and post- intervention: reduction in HbA(1)c; other variables: examination and analytical data, therapeutic compliance, self-monitoring, self-care, attitudes and motivation (DAS-3SP survey). RESULTS: After intervention, more diabetics had a lower HbA(1)c following a full intervention: "DE" and "PE", RR: 1.93 (0.85-4.40) and exercise, RR: 1.56 (0.65-3.76). With simultaneous DE and PE, the BMI, RR: 1.61 (0.85-3.03) and LDL cholesterol, RR: 1.82 (0.99-3.36), of many subjects decreased. Dietary compliance, RR: 1.29 (0.32-5.22) and exercise, RR: 1.93 (0.76-4.91) also increased, more patients performing their own checks, RR: 3.86 (0.90-16.55) and improving motivation/attitudes in "strict control management", RR: 1.48 (0.94-2.34). With PE, systolic and diastolic BP decreased in more patients RR: 1.35 (0.72-2.52), 1.87 (0.72-4.84) while in the DE group only diastolic values decreased 1.80 (0.69-4.67). CONCLUSIONS:Patient conditions improve more with the combination of DE and PE, though the results are not statistically significant, probably due to insufficient sample size.
Authors: Dawn W Satterfield; Michele Volansky; Carl J Caspersen; Michael M Engelgau; Barbara A Bowman; Ed W Gregg; Linda S Geiss; Gwen M Hosey; Jeannette May; Frank Vinicor Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: M A Salinero-Fort; M Salinero-Fort; F Arrieta-Blanco; E Carrillo-de Santa Pau; C Martín-Madrazo; M Piñera-Tames; C Vázquez-Martínez; J C Abánades-Herranz Journal: Rev Clin Esp Date: 2009 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.556
Authors: Francisco Represas-Carrera; Sabela Couso-Viana; Fátima Méndez-López; Bárbara Masluk; Rosa Magallón-Botaya; Jose I Recio-Rodríguez; Haizea Pombo; Alfonso Leiva-Rus; Montserrat Gil-Girbau; Emma Motrico; Ruth Martí-Lluch; Francisco Gude; Ana Clavería Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-28 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Javier Parra-Sánchez; María Moreno-Jiménez; Carla M Nicola; Ileana I Nocua-Rodríguez; María R Amegló-Parejo; Marlen Del Carmen-Peña; Carlos Cordero-Prieto; María J Gajardo-Barrena Journal: Aten Primaria Date: 2015-03-11 Impact factor: 1.137