Literature DB >> 21349453

Long-term outcomes after the percutaneous treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis.

Azeem Latib1, Marco Mussardo, Alfonso Ielasi, Giandomenico Tarsia, Cosmo Godino, Rasha Al-Lamee, Alaide Chieffo, Flavio Airoldi, Mauro Carlino, Matteo Montorfano, Antonio Colombo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the long-term angiographic and clinical outcomes after the treatment of drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis (DES-ISR) based on the angiographic pattern of restenosis.
BACKGROUND: Long-term outcomes after percutaneous treatment of DES-ISR are unclear.
METHODS: This study performed a retrospective analysis of 481 consecutive de novo DES-ISR lesions (n = 392) treated percutaneously between August 2002 and July 2007. The lesions were divided based on the pattern of restenosis: focal (305; 63.4%), diffuse (120; 24.9%), and occlusive (56; 11.6%).
RESULTS: The majority (65%) of patients had angina or ischemia on presentation and 13% had an acute coronary syndrome. Angiographic follow-up after treatment of DES-ISR was available in 65.5% of lesions. A second angiographic restenosis occurred in 29.1% of the focal group, 45.8% (p = 0.007) of the diffuse, and 65.6% (p < 0.0001) of the occlusive. The pattern of DES-ISR predicted the pattern of recurrence: occlusive reoccluded in 66.7%; diffuse recurred as diffuse or occlusive in 57.9%; focal as focal in 67.2%. During a median follow-up of 2.97 years (interquartile range: 2.37 to 3.89), major adverse cardiac events occurred in 32.8% of patients with no significant differences among the focal, diffuse, and occlusive groups (30.9%, 38.7%, 31.1%; p = 0.38). Diffuse restenosis was associated with a significantly higher target lesion revascularization rate compared with focal (27.1% vs. 15.8%; p = 0.008). A disparity between restenosis (65.6%) and target lesion revascularization (18.5%) rates for occlusive DES-ISR suggests that as many recurrent restenoses were occlusive, they were not retreated.
CONCLUSIONS: DES-ISR identifies a high-risk cohort that is at an increased risk of events, in particular repeat revascularization, during long-term follow-up. The initial pattern of restenosis is the most important predictor of recurrent restenosis or the need for subsequent reintervention.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21349453     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.09.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  14 in total

1.  Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis-evidence for universal recommendation?

Authors:  Ibrahim Akin; Christoph A Nienaber
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Routine Angiographic Follow-Up After Coronary Artery Disease Revascularization: Is Seeing Believing?

Authors:  Harsh Agrawal; Mohamed Teleb; Saba Lahsaei; Luis Carbajal; Ruben Montanez; Joseph P Carrozza
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Therapeutic Options for In-Stent Restenosis.

Authors:  Charles Nicolais; Vladimir Lakhter; Hafeez Ul Hassan Virk; Partha Sardar; Chirag Bavishi; Brian O'Murchu; Saurav Chatterjee
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Long-term outcomes of heart transplantation recipients with transplant coronary artery disease who develop in-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Michael S Lee; Richard K Cheng; David E Kandzari; Ajay J Kirtane
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 5.  Drug-coated balloon therapy in coronary and peripheral artery disease.

Authors:  Robert A Byrne; Michael Joner; Fernando Alfonso; Adnan Kastrati
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  The rs4783961 and rs708272 genetic variants of the CETP gene are associated with coronary artery disease, but not with restenosis after coronary stenting.

Authors:  Gilberto Vargas-Alarcón; Oscar Pérez-Méndez; Rosalinda Posadas-Sánchez; Marco A Peña-Duque; Marco A Martínez-Ríos; Hilda Delgadillo-Rodriguez; José M Fragoso
Journal:  Arch Cardiol Mex       Date:  2022-07-01

7.  Clinical Coronary In-Stent Restenosis Follow-Up after Treatment and Analyses of Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Barbara Campos Abreu Marino; Guilherme Abreu Nascimento; Walter Rabelo; Marcos Antônio Marino; Roberto Luiz Marino; Antonio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  Effect of diabetes mellitus on long-term outcomes after repeat drug-eluting stent implantation for in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  Lin Zhao; Weiwei Zhu; Xiaojiang Zhang; Dongfang He; Chengjun Guo
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 2.298

9.  Long-term Outcome following Percutaneous Intervention of Intra-stent Coronary Occlusion and Evaluating the Different Treatment Modalities.

Authors:  Sandeep Basavarajaiah; Satoru Mitomo; Sunao Nakamura; Vinoda Sharma; Ishaq Mohammed; Yusuke Watanabe; Toru Ouchi; Gurbir Bhatia; Jerome Ment; Sampath Athukorala; Michael Pitt; George Pulikal; Bethan Freestone; Hannah Rides; Nitin Kumar; Richard Watkin; Kaeng Lee
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2021-05-31

10.  In vitro study on the feasibility of magnetic stent hyperthermia for the treatment of cardiovascular restenosis.

Authors:  Li Li; Rui Wang; Huan-Huan Shi; LE Xie; Jing-Ding-Sha Li; Wei-Chao Kong; Jin-Tian Tang; DA-Nian Ke; Ling-Yun Zhao
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.