Literature DB >> 21349047

Conducting research in the aftermath of disasters: ethical considerations.

Dónal P O'Mathúna1.   

Abstract

Disaster research focuses on the impact disasters have on people and social structures. Planning for and responding to disasters require evidence to guide decision-makers. The need for such evidence provides an ethical mandate for the conduct of sound disaster research. Disaster research ethics draws attention to ethical issues common to all research involving human subjects. However, disaster research involves a number of distinctive factors, including the degree of devastation affecting participants and the urgency often involved in initiating research projects. Such factors generate ethical issues not usually encountered with other types of research, and create tensions that must be taken into account in designing and conducting disaster research so that it attains the highest ethical standards. An overview of general research ethics issues is presented here in the context of disaster research. As with all research involving humans, protection of participants and minimizing harm is the highest ethical priority. Other ethical issues include formal ethical approval, informed consent, balancing burdens and benefits, participant recruitment, coercion, the role of compensation, and conflicts of interest. Using examples from specific studies, some of the distinctive features of disaster research ethics are discussed. These include cross-cultural collaboration and communication, vulnerability of participants arising from the degree of devastation, avoiding exploitation of disaster victims, and protecting researchers. The article concludes with some of the major challenges facing disaster research ethics and how they might be addressed.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd and Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21349047     DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-5391.2010.01076.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evid Based Med        ISSN: 1756-5391


  13 in total

1.  DEALING WITH DISASTER DATABASES - WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM HEALTH AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS?: Application in practice.

Authors:  Ishani Kar-Purkayastha; Mike Clarke; Virginia Murray
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2011-09-30

Review 2.  A systematic literature search on psychological first aid: lack of evidence to develop guidelines.

Authors:  Tessa Dieltjens; Inge Moonens; Koen Van Praet; Emmy De Buck; Philippe Vandekerckhove
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A research agenda for humanitarian health ethics.

Authors:  Matthew Hunt; Lisa Schwartz; John Pringle; Renaud Boulanger; Elysée Nouvet; Dónal O'Mathúna
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2014-08-12

4.  The Challenge of Timely, Responsive and Rigorous Ethics Review of Disaster Research: Views of Research Ethics Committee Members.

Authors:  Matthew Hunt; Catherine M Tansey; James Anderson; Renaud F Boulanger; Lisa Eckenwiler; John Pringle; Lisa Schwartz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Research in disaster settings: a systematic qualitative review of ethical guidelines.

Authors:  Signe Mezinska; Péter Kakuk; Goran Mijaljica; Marcin Waligóra; Dónal P O'Mathúna
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 6.  Ethical standards for mental health and psychosocial support research in emergencies: review of literature and current debates.

Authors:  Anna Chiumento; Atif Rahman; Lucy Frith; Leslie Snider; Wietse A Tol
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 4.185

7.  Comparing residential contamination in a Houston environmental justice neighborhood before and after Hurricane Harvey.

Authors:  Jennifer A Horney; Gaston A Casillas; Erin Baker; Kahler W Stone; Katie R Kirsch; Krisa Camargo; Terry L Wade; Thomas J McDonald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Familiar ethical issues amplified: how members of research ethics committees describe ethical distinctions between disaster and non-disaster research.

Authors:  Catherine M Tansey; James Anderson; Renaud F Boulanger; Lisa Eckenwiler; John Pringle; Lisa Schwartz; Matthew Hunt
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Conducting Science in Disasters: Recommendations from the NIEHS Working Group for Special IRB Considerations in the Review of Disaster Related Research.

Authors:  Joan P Packenham; Richard T Rosselli; Steve K Ramsey; Holly A Taylor; Alice Fothergill; Julia Slutsman; Aubrey Miller
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Supporting the use of research evidence in decision-making in crisis zones in low- and middle-income countries: a critical interpretive synthesis.

Authors:  Ahmad Firas Khalid; John N Lavis; Fadi El-Jardali; Meredith Vanstone
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2020-02-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.