OBJECTIVES: Low-level laser irradiation (LLLI) has the potential of exerting cardioprotective effect following myocardial infarction (MI). The authors hypothesized that LLLI could influence the expression of cardiac cytokines and contribute to the reversal of ventricular remodeling. BACKGROUND: LLLI regulates the expression of cytokines after tissue damage. However, little is known concerning the alteration of the cardiac cytokine expression profile after LLLI. METHODS: MI was created by coronary ligation. The surviving rats were divided randomly into laser and control groups. 33 rats were exposed to a diode laser (635 nm, 5 mW, CW, laser, beam spot size 0.8 cm(2), 6 mW/cm(2), 150 sec, 0.8 J, 1J/cm(2)) as laser group. Another 33 rats received only coronary ligation and served as control group. 28 rats received a thoracotomy without coronary ligation (sham group). One day after laser irradiation, 5 rats from each group were sacrificed and the heart tissues were analyzed by cytokine antibody arrays. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed to confirm its reliability. Two weeks after MI, cardiac function and structure were evaluated by echocardiography and histological study. RESULTS: Cytokine antibody array indicated 4 cytokines were significantly changed after laser therapy. ELISA confirmed that granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor and fractalkine were the cytokines involved in the response to therapeutic laser irradiation. However, there was no difference in cytokine release between various groups at 2 weeks after MI. Although LLLI did not improve the damaged heart function, it did reduce the infarct area expansion. CONCLUSIONS: The antibody-based protein array technology was applied for screening the cytokine expression profile following MI, with or without laser irradiation. The expression of multiple cytokines was regulated in the acute phase after LLLI. Our results revealed a potential novel mechanism for applying laser therapy to the treatment of heart disease.
OBJECTIVES: Low-level laser irradiation (LLLI) has the potential of exerting cardioprotective effect following myocardial infarction (MI). The authors hypothesized that LLLI could influence the expression of cardiac cytokines and contribute to the reversal of ventricular remodeling. BACKGROUND: LLLI regulates the expression of cytokines after tissue damage. However, little is known concerning the alteration of the cardiac cytokine expression profile after LLLI. METHODS: MI was created by coronary ligation. The surviving rats were divided randomly into laser and control groups. 33 rats were exposed to a diode laser (635 nm, 5 mW, CW, laser, beam spot size 0.8 cm(2), 6 mW/cm(2), 150 sec, 0.8 J, 1J/cm(2)) as laser group. Another 33 rats received only coronary ligation and served as control group. 28 rats received a thoracotomy without coronary ligation (sham group). One day after laser irradiation, 5 rats from each group were sacrificed and the heart tissues were analyzed by cytokine antibody arrays. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed to confirm its reliability. Two weeks after MI, cardiac function and structure were evaluated by echocardiography and histological study. RESULTS: Cytokine antibody array indicated 4 cytokines were significantly changed after laser therapy. ELISA confirmed that granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor and fractalkine were the cytokines involved in the response to therapeutic laser irradiation. However, there was no difference in cytokine release between various groups at 2 weeks after MI. Although LLLI did not improve the damaged heart function, it did reduce the infarct area expansion. CONCLUSIONS: The antibody-based protein array technology was applied for screening the cytokine expression profile following MI, with or without laser irradiation. The expression of multiple cytokines was regulated in the acute phase after LLLI. Our results revealed a potential novel mechanism for applying laser therapy to the treatment of heart disease.
Authors: Hoon Chung; Tianhong Dai; Sulbha K Sharma; Ying-Ying Huang; James D Carroll; Michael R Hamblin Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2011-11-02 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Laís M S Neves; Elaine C D Gonçalves; Juliana Cavalli; Graziela Vieira; Larissa R Laurindo; Róli R Simões; Igor S Coelho; Adair R S Santos; Alexandre M Marcolino; Maíra Cola; Rafael C Dutra Journal: Mol Neurobiol Date: 2017-10-04 Impact factor: 5.590
Authors: Martha T Manchini; Ednei L Antônio; José Antônio Silva Junior; Paulo de Tarso C de Carvalho; Regiane Albertini; Fernando C Pereira; Regiane Feliciano; Jairo Montemor; Stella S Vieira; Vanessa Grandinetti; Amanda Yoshizaki; Marcio Chaves; Móises P da Silva; Rafael do Nascimento de Lima; Danilo S Bocalini; Bruno L de Melo; Paulo J F Tucci; Andrey J Serra Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2017-01-30 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Martha Trindade Manchini; Andrey Jorge Serra; Regiane dos Santos Feliciano; Eduardo Tadeu Santana; Ednei Luis Antônio; Paulo de Tarso Camillo de Carvalho; Jairo Montemor; Renato Oliveira Crajoinas; Adriana Castello Costa Girardi; Paulo José Ferreira Tucci; José Antônio Silva Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-07-03 Impact factor: 3.240