Literature DB >> 21347988

Timing is everything: changes in presentation rate have opposite effects on auditory and visual implicit statistical learning.

Lauren L Emberson1, Christopher M Conway, Morten H Christiansen.   

Abstract

Implicit statistical learning (ISL) is exclusive to neither a particular sensory modality nor a single domain of processing. Even so, differences in perceptual processing may substantially affect learning across modalities. In three experiments, statistically equivalent auditory and visual familiarizations were presented under different timing conditions that either facilitated or disrupted temporal processing (fast or slow presentation rates). We find an interaction of rate and modality of presentation: At fast rates, auditory ISL was superior to visual. However, at slow presentation rates, the opposite pattern of results was found: Visual ISL was superior to auditory. Thus, we find that changes to presentation rate differentially affect ISL across sensory modalities. Additional experiments confirmed that this modality-specific effect was not due to cross-modal interference or attentional manipulations. These findings suggest that ISL is rooted in modality-specific, perceptually based processes.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21347988     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2010.538972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  31 in total

1.  Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques.

Authors:  Julie M Schneider; Anqi Hu; Jennifer Legault; Zhenghan Qi
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 2.  What's statistical about learning? Insights from modelling statistical learning as a set of memory processes.

Authors:  Erik D Thiessen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Towards a theory of individual differences in statistical learning.

Authors:  Noam Siegelman; Louisa Bogaerts; Morten H Christiansen; Ram Frost
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  When learning goes beyond statistics: Infants represent visual sequences in terms of chunks.

Authors:  Lauren K Slone; Scott P Johnson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-05-26

Review 5.  Domain generality versus modality specificity: the paradox of statistical learning.

Authors:  Ram Frost; Blair C Armstrong; Noam Siegelman; Morten H Christiansen
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Statistical learning as an individual ability: Theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence.

Authors:  Noam Siegelman; Ram Frost
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  Infants' statistical learning: 2- and 5-month-olds' segmentation of continuous visual sequences.

Authors:  Lauren Krogh Slone; Scott P Johnson
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2015-03-07

8.  Second Language Experience Facilitates Statistical Learning of Novel Linguistic Materials.

Authors:  Christine E Potter; Tianlin Wang; Jenny R Saffran
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-12-18

9.  Splitting the variance of statistical learning performance: A parametric investigation of exposure duration and transitional probabilities.

Authors:  Louisa Bogaerts; Noam Siegelman; Ram Frost
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

10.  Visual statistical learning is not reliably modulated by selective attention to isolated events.

Authors:  Elizabeth Musz; Matthew J Weber; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.