Literature DB >> 21347976

Affective and cognitive attitudes, uncertainty avoidance and intention to obtain genetic testing: an extension of the Theory of Planned Behaviour.

Katharina Wolff1, Karin Nordin, Wibecke Brun, Gunilla Berglund, Gerd Kvale.   

Abstract

To ensure successful implementation of genetic screening and counselling according to patients best interests, the attitudes and motives of the public are important to consider. The aim of this study was to apply a theoretical framework in order to investigate which individual and disease characteristics might facilitate the uptake of genetic testing. A questionnaire using an extended version of the Theory of Planned Behaviour was developed to assess the predictive value of affective and cognitive expected outcomes, subjective norms, perceived control and uncertainty avoidance on the intention to undergo genetic testing. In addition to these individual characteristics, the predictive power of two disease characteristics was investigated by systematically varying the diseases fatality and penetrance (i.e. the probability of getting ill in case one is a mutation carrier). This resulted in four versions of the questionnaire which was mailed to a random sample of 2400 Norwegians. Results showed genetic test interest to be quite high, and to vary depending on the characteristics of the disease, with participants preferring tests for highly penetrant diseases. The most important individual predictor was uncertainty avoidance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21347976     DOI: 10.1080/08870441003763253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Health        ISSN: 0887-0446


  9 in total

1.  The effect of disease risk probability and disease type on interest in clinic-based versus direct-to-consumer genetic testing services.

Authors:  Kerry Sherman; Laura-Kate Shaw; Katrina Champion; Fernanda Caldeira; Margaret McCaskill
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-03-27

Review 2.  Predictors of genetic testing decisions: a systematic review and critique of the literature.

Authors:  Kate Sweeny; Arezou Ghane; Angela M Legg; Ho Phi Huynh; Sara E Andrews
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Is genetic counseling a stressful event?

Authors:  Karin Nordin; Afsaneh Roshanai; Cathrine Bjorvatn; Katharina Wollf; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Ingvar Bjelland; Gerd Kvale
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 4.089

4.  Genetic testing users in Italy and Germany: Health orientation, health-related habits, and psychological profile.

Authors:  Giulia Ongaro; Eleonora Brivio; Clizia Cincidda; Serena Oliveri; Francesca Spinella; Daniela Steinberger; Ilaria Cutica; Alessandra Gorini; Gabriella Pravettoni
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.183

5.  COVID-19 Vaccination Behavior Among Frontline Healthcare Workers in Pakistan: The Theory of Planned Behavior, Perceived Susceptibility, and Anticipated Regret.

Authors:  Muhammad Khayyam; Shuai Chuanmin; Muhammad Asad Salim; Arjumand Nizami; Jawad Ali; Hussain Ali; Nawab Khan; Muhammad Ihtisham; Raheel Anjum
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-14

6.  Trust in Science as a Possible Mediator between Different Antecedents and COVID-19 Booster Vaccination Intention: An Integration of Health Belief Model (HBM) and Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB).

Authors:  Massimiliano Barattucci; Stefano Pagliaro; Chiara Ballone; Manuel Teresi; Carlo Consoli; Alice Garofalo; Andrea De Giorgio; Tiziana Ramaci
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-08

7.  Factors influencing intention to apply spatial approaches to on-farm experimentation: insights from the Australian winegrape sector.

Authors:  Xinxin Song; Katherine J Evans; Robert G V Bramley; Saideepa Kumar
Journal:  Agron Sustain Dev       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 7.832

8.  Attitudes among parents of persons with autism spectrum disorder towards information about genetic risk and future health.

Authors:  Jarle Johannessen; Terje Nærland; Sigrun Hope; Tonje Torske; Anett Kaale; Katrine V Wirgenes; Eva Malt; Srdjan Djurovic; Marcella Rietschel; Ole A Andreassen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 5.351

9.  COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions: The Theory of Planned Behavior, Optimistic Bias, and Anticipated Regret.

Authors:  Katharina Wolff
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.